Five required + four optional slides, slotted into the existing flow
without renumbering the visible deck UI:
REQUIRED
- problem-statement (after motivation): single-sentence problem,
three numeric stat cards, explicit task-type justification
(multi-class classification, why not regression/ranking)
- research-questions (after problem-statement): two-column literature
gap layout + RQ1/RQ2/RQ3
- solution-overview (after research-questions): inline-SVG block
diagram of the pipeline (fleet hosts → receiver → episodes →
windowing → model zoo → per-window phase → trust score →
containment + reset)
- evaluation-setup (between chunking and models): four blocks
covering split recipe, primary metric, baselines compared, and
what's reported alongside accuracy. Each block leads with the
*why*, matching the assignment's "explain not only what will be
measured but why" requirement.
- conclusion-future (before references): two-column "what we showed"
+ unsupervised next steps (clustering / anomaly / SSL pretrain /
embedding viz). Addresses Section 8 of the assignment guide.
OPTIONAL
- theoretical-contributions: window-centre labelling,
schema-hashed checkpoints, cross-host as eval axis
- practical-contributions: /proc-only deployment,
producer-agnostic dashboard, labelled dataset on disk
- design-principles: one-loop-many-models, typed events as
contract, two-agent path ownership
- limitations: two-host fleet, synthetic profiles, 10 Hz floor,
KNN cross-host gap
Plus references/links.md gains four real online references (PyTorch,
XGBoost, scikit-learn, proc(5)) bringing the citation count from 8
to 12 — over the assignment's 10-source minimum.
CSS additions cover the new layouts (.problem-claim, .problem-stats,
.research-grid, .pipeline-svg + .pipeline-stage / .pipeline-arrow,
.eval-blocks, .conclusion-grid). Limitations cards reuse the
motivation-card pattern with an armed-phase amber marker for the
"warning" feel.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
db9f013969