feat(compiler/lambda_lifting): preprocess nonrecursive recusor applications using the same approach used for cases_on applications
This commit is contained in:
parent
a4ec6a3a17
commit
37bc76ff09
1 changed files with 29 additions and 11 deletions
|
|
@ -117,6 +117,13 @@ protected:
|
|||
return compiler_step_visitor::visit_app(e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool is_nonrecursive_recursor(name const & n) {
|
||||
if (auto I_name = inductive::is_elim_rule(env(), n)) {
|
||||
return !is_recursive_datatype(env(), *I_name);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned get_constructor_arity(name const & n) {
|
||||
declaration d = env().get(n);
|
||||
expr e = d.get_type();
|
||||
|
|
@ -136,33 +143,44 @@ protected:
|
|||
expr l = locals.push_local(binding_name(e), binding_domain(e), binding_info(e));
|
||||
e = instantiate(binding_body(e), l);
|
||||
}
|
||||
e = beta_reduce(e);
|
||||
e = visit(e);
|
||||
return locals.mk_lambda(e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Process C.cases_on applications and C.rec application for non-recursive C */
|
||||
expr visit_cases_on_app(expr const & e) {
|
||||
buffer<expr> args;
|
||||
expr const & fn = get_app_args(e, args);
|
||||
lean_assert(is_constant(fn) && is_cases_on_recursor(env(), const_name(fn)));
|
||||
name const & cases_on_name = const_name(fn);
|
||||
name const & I_name = cases_on_name.get_prefix();
|
||||
lean_assert(is_constant(fn));
|
||||
bool is_cases_on = is_cases_on_recursor(env(), const_name(fn));
|
||||
name const & rec_name = const_name(fn);
|
||||
name const & I_name = rec_name.get_prefix();
|
||||
unsigned nparams = *inductive::get_num_params(env(), I_name);
|
||||
unsigned nminors = *inductive::get_num_minor_premises(env(), I_name);
|
||||
unsigned nindices = *inductive::get_num_indices(env(), I_name);
|
||||
unsigned cases_on_arity = nparams + 1 /* typeformer/motive */ + nindices + 1 /* major premise */ + nminors;
|
||||
unsigned major_idx = nparams + 1 + nindices;
|
||||
unsigned arity = nparams + 1 /* typeformer/motive */ + nindices + 1 /* major premise */ + nminors;
|
||||
unsigned major_idx;
|
||||
unsigned first_minor_idx;
|
||||
if (is_cases_on) {
|
||||
major_idx = nparams + 1 + nindices;
|
||||
first_minor_idx = major_idx + 1;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
major_idx = *inductive::get_elim_major_idx(env(), rec_name);
|
||||
first_minor_idx = nparams + 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* This transformation assumes eta-expansion have already been applied.
|
||||
So, we should have a sufficient number of arguments. */
|
||||
lean_assert(args.size() >= cases_on_arity);
|
||||
lean_assert(args.size() >= arity);
|
||||
buffer<name> cnames;
|
||||
get_intro_rule_names(env(), I_name, cnames);
|
||||
/* Process major premise */
|
||||
args[major_idx] = visit(args[major_idx]);
|
||||
/* Process extra arguments */
|
||||
for (unsigned i = cases_on_arity; i < args.size(); i++)
|
||||
for (unsigned i = arity; i < args.size(); i++)
|
||||
args[i] = visit(args[i]);
|
||||
/* Process minor premise */
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0, j = major_idx + 1; i < cnames.size(); i++, j++) {
|
||||
/* Process minor premises */
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0, j = first_minor_idx; i < cnames.size(); i++, j++) {
|
||||
unsigned carity = get_constructor_arity(cnames[i]);
|
||||
lean_assert(carity >= nparams);
|
||||
unsigned cdata_sz = carity - nparams;
|
||||
|
|
@ -175,13 +193,13 @@ protected:
|
|||
expr const & fn = get_app_fn(e);
|
||||
if (is_constant(fn)) {
|
||||
name const & n = const_name(fn);
|
||||
if (is_cases_on_recursor(env(), n)) {
|
||||
if (is_cases_on_recursor(env(), n) || is_nonrecursive_recursor(n)) {
|
||||
return visit_cases_on_app(e);
|
||||
} else if (inductive::is_elim_rule(env(), n)) {
|
||||
return visit_recursor_app(e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return compiler_step_visitor::visit_app(e);
|
||||
return compiler_step_visitor::visit_app(beta_reduce(e));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue