doc: expand docstring for intros (#2777)
The docstring for `intros` did not explain the difference between the zero-argument and the one-or-more-argument cases.
This commit is contained in:
parent
5f59d7f7b4
commit
fcb30c269b
1 changed files with 69 additions and 2 deletions
|
|
@ -39,8 +39,75 @@ be a `let` or function type.
|
|||
syntax (name := intro) "intro" notFollowedBy("|") (ppSpace colGt term:max)* : tactic
|
||||
|
||||
/--
|
||||
`intros x...` behaves like `intro x...`, but then keeps introducing (anonymous)
|
||||
hypotheses until goal is not of a function type.
|
||||
Introduces zero or more hypotheses, optionally naming them.
|
||||
|
||||
- `intros` is equivalent to repeatedly applying `intro`
|
||||
until the goal is not an obvious candidate for `intro`, which is to say
|
||||
that so long as the goal is a `let` or a pi type (e.g. an implication, function, or universal quantifier),
|
||||
the `intros` tactic will introduce an anonymous hypothesis.
|
||||
This tactic does not unfold definitions.
|
||||
|
||||
- `intros x y ...` is equivalent to `intro x y ...`,
|
||||
introducing hypotheses for each supplied argument and unfolding definitions as necessary.
|
||||
Each argument can be either an identifier or a `_`.
|
||||
An identifier indicates a name to use for the corresponding introduced hypothesis,
|
||||
and a `_` indicates that the hypotheses should be introduced anonymously.
|
||||
|
||||
## Examples
|
||||
|
||||
Basic properties:
|
||||
```lean
|
||||
def AllEven (f : Nat → Nat) := ∀ n, f n % 2 = 0
|
||||
|
||||
-- Introduces the two obvious hypotheses automatically
|
||||
example : ∀ (f : Nat → Nat), AllEven f → AllEven (fun k => f (k + 1)) := by
|
||||
intros
|
||||
/- Tactic state
|
||||
f✝ : Nat → Nat
|
||||
a✝ : AllEven f✝
|
||||
⊢ AllEven fun k => f✝ (k + 1) -/
|
||||
sorry
|
||||
|
||||
-- Introduces exactly two hypotheses, naming only the first
|
||||
example : ∀ (f : Nat → Nat), AllEven f → AllEven (fun k => f (k + 1)) := by
|
||||
intros g _
|
||||
/- Tactic state
|
||||
g : Nat → Nat
|
||||
a✝ : AllEven g
|
||||
⊢ AllEven fun k => g (k + 1) -/
|
||||
sorry
|
||||
|
||||
-- Introduces exactly three hypotheses, which requires unfolding `AllEven`
|
||||
example : ∀ (f : Nat → Nat), AllEven f → AllEven (fun k => f (k + 1)) := by
|
||||
intros f h n
|
||||
/- Tactic state
|
||||
f : Nat → Nat
|
||||
h : AllEven f
|
||||
n : Nat
|
||||
⊢ (fun k => f (k + 1)) n % 2 = 0 -/
|
||||
apply h
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Implications:
|
||||
```lean
|
||||
example (p q : Prop) : p → q → p := by
|
||||
intros
|
||||
/- Tactic state
|
||||
a✝¹ : p
|
||||
a✝ : q
|
||||
⊢ p -/
|
||||
assumption
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Let bindings:
|
||||
```lean
|
||||
example : let n := 1; let k := 2; n + k = 3 := by
|
||||
intros
|
||||
/- n✝ : Nat := 1
|
||||
k✝ : Nat := 2
|
||||
⊢ n✝ + k✝ = 3 -/
|
||||
rfl
|
||||
```
|
||||
-/
|
||||
syntax (name := intros) "intros" (ppSpace colGt (ident <|> hole))* : tactic
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue