feat: further theorems for List.erase (#4723)
This commit is contained in:
parent
9d14e4423c
commit
fce82eba40
3 changed files with 253 additions and 30 deletions
|
|
@ -350,6 +350,26 @@ theorem forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} :
|
|||
theorem forall_mem_ne {a : α} {l : List α} : (∀ a' : α, a' ∈ l → ¬a = a') ↔ a ∉ l :=
|
||||
⟨fun h m => h _ m rfl, fun h _ m e => h (e.symm ▸ m)⟩
|
||||
|
||||
@[simp]
|
||||
theorem forall_mem_ne' {a : α} {l : List α} : (∀ a' : α, a' ∈ l → ¬a' = a) ↔ a ∉ l :=
|
||||
⟨fun h m => h _ m rfl, fun h _ m e => h (e.symm ▸ m)⟩
|
||||
|
||||
@[simp]
|
||||
theorem any_beq [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] {l : List α} : (l.any fun x => a == x) ↔ a ∈ l := by
|
||||
induction l <;> simp_all
|
||||
|
||||
@[simp]
|
||||
theorem any_beq' [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] {l : List α} : (l.any fun x => x == a) ↔ a ∈ l := by
|
||||
induction l <;> simp_all [eq_comm (a := a)]
|
||||
|
||||
@[simp]
|
||||
theorem all_bne [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] {l : List α} : (l.all fun x => a != x) ↔ a ∉ l := by
|
||||
induction l <;> simp_all
|
||||
|
||||
@[simp]
|
||||
theorem all_bne' [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] {l : List α} : (l.all fun x => x != a) ↔ a ∉ l := by
|
||||
induction l <;> simp_all [eq_comm (a := a)]
|
||||
|
||||
theorem exists_mem_nil (p : α → Prop) : ¬ (∃ x, ∃ _ : x ∈ @nil α, p x) := nofun
|
||||
|
||||
theorem forall_mem_nil (p : α → Prop) : ∀ (x) (_ : x ∈ @nil α), p x := nofun
|
||||
|
|
@ -932,10 +952,10 @@ theorem forall_mem_map_iff {f : α → β} {l : List α} {P : β → Prop} :
|
|||
|
||||
/-! ### filter -/
|
||||
|
||||
@[simp] theorem filter_cons_of_pos {p : α → Bool} {a : α} (l) (pa : p a) :
|
||||
@[simp] theorem filter_cons_of_pos {p : α → Bool} {a : α} {l} (pa : p a) :
|
||||
filter p (a :: l) = a :: filter p l := by rw [filter, pa]
|
||||
|
||||
@[simp] theorem filter_cons_of_neg {p : α → Bool} {a : α} (l) (pa : ¬ p a) :
|
||||
@[simp] theorem filter_cons_of_neg {p : α → Bool} {a : α} {l} (pa : ¬ p a) :
|
||||
filter p (a :: l) = filter p l := by rw [filter, eq_false_of_ne_true pa]
|
||||
|
||||
theorem filter_cons :
|
||||
|
|
@ -1030,10 +1050,10 @@ theorem head_filter_of_pos {p : α → Bool} {l : List α} (w : l ≠ []) (h : p
|
|||
|
||||
/-! ### filterMap -/
|
||||
|
||||
@[simp] theorem filterMap_cons_none {f : α → Option β} (a : α) (l : List α) (h : f a = none) :
|
||||
@[simp] theorem filterMap_cons_none {f : α → Option β} {a : α} {l : List α} (h : f a = none) :
|
||||
filterMap f (a :: l) = filterMap f l := by simp only [filterMap, h]
|
||||
|
||||
@[simp] theorem filterMap_cons_some (f : α → Option β) (a : α) (l : List α) {b : β} (h : f a = some b) :
|
||||
@[simp] theorem filterMap_cons_some {f : α → Option β} {a : α} {l : List α} {b : β} (h : f a = some b) :
|
||||
filterMap f (a :: l) = b :: filterMap f l := by simp only [filterMap, h]
|
||||
|
||||
@[simp]
|
||||
|
|
@ -2005,10 +2025,26 @@ theorem takeWhile_cons (p : α → Bool) (a : α) (l : List α) :
|
|||
simp only [takeWhile]
|
||||
by_cases h: p a <;> simp [h]
|
||||
|
||||
@[simp] theorem takeWhile_cons_of_pos {p : α → Bool} {a : α} {l : List α} (h : p a) :
|
||||
(a :: l).takeWhile p = a :: l.takeWhile p := by
|
||||
simp [takeWhile_cons, h]
|
||||
|
||||
@[simp] theorem takeWhile_cons_of_neg {p : α → Bool} {a : α} {l : List α} (h : ¬ p a) :
|
||||
(a :: l).takeWhile p = [] := by
|
||||
simp [takeWhile_cons, h]
|
||||
|
||||
theorem dropWhile_cons :
|
||||
(x :: xs : List α).dropWhile p = if p x then xs.dropWhile p else x :: xs := by
|
||||
split <;> simp_all [dropWhile]
|
||||
|
||||
@[simp] theorem dropWhile_cons_of_pos {a : α} {l : List α} (h : p a) :
|
||||
(a :: l).dropWhile p = l.dropWhile p := by
|
||||
simp [dropWhile_cons, h]
|
||||
|
||||
@[simp] theorem dropWhile_cons_of_neg {a : α} {l : List α} (h : ¬ p a) :
|
||||
(a :: l).dropWhile p = a :: l := by
|
||||
simp [dropWhile_cons, h]
|
||||
|
||||
theorem head?_takeWhile (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) : (l.takeWhile p).head? = l.head?.filter p := by
|
||||
cases l with
|
||||
| nil => rfl
|
||||
|
|
@ -2058,6 +2094,24 @@ theorem dropWhile_map (f : α → β) (p : β → Bool) (l : List α) :
|
|||
| [] => rfl
|
||||
| x :: xs => by simp [takeWhile, dropWhile]; cases p x <;> simp [takeWhile_append_dropWhile p xs]
|
||||
|
||||
theorem takeWhile_append {xs ys : List α} :
|
||||
(xs ++ ys).takeWhile p =
|
||||
if (xs.takeWhile p).length = xs.length then xs ++ ys.takeWhile p else xs.takeWhile p := by
|
||||
induction xs with
|
||||
| nil => simp
|
||||
| cons x xs ih =>
|
||||
simp only [cons_append, takeWhile_cons]
|
||||
split
|
||||
· simp_all only [length_cons, add_one_inj]
|
||||
split <;> rfl
|
||||
· simp_all
|
||||
|
||||
@[simp] theorem takeWhile_append_of_pos {p : α → Bool} {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h : ∀ a ∈ l₁, p a) :
|
||||
(l₁ ++ l₂).takeWhile p = l₁ ++ l₂.takeWhile p := by
|
||||
induction l₁ with
|
||||
| nil => simp
|
||||
| cons x xs ih => simp_all [takeWhile_cons]
|
||||
|
||||
theorem dropWhile_append {xs ys : List α} :
|
||||
(xs ++ ys).dropWhile p =
|
||||
if (xs.dropWhile p).isEmpty then ys.dropWhile p else xs.dropWhile p ++ ys := by
|
||||
|
|
@ -2067,6 +2121,12 @@ theorem dropWhile_append {xs ys : List α} :
|
|||
simp only [cons_append, dropWhile_cons]
|
||||
split <;> simp_all
|
||||
|
||||
@[simp] theorem dropWhile_append_of_pos {p : α → Bool} {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h : ∀ a ∈ l₁, p a) :
|
||||
(l₁ ++ l₂).dropWhile p = l₂.dropWhile p := by
|
||||
induction l₁ with
|
||||
| nil => simp
|
||||
| cons x xs ih => simp_all [dropWhile_cons]
|
||||
|
||||
@[simp] theorem takeWhile_replicate_eq_filter (p : α → Bool) :
|
||||
(replicate n a).takeWhile p = (replicate n a).filter p := by
|
||||
induction n with
|
||||
|
|
@ -2317,6 +2377,9 @@ theorem Sublist.eq_of_length : l₁ <+ l₂ → length l₁ = length l₂ → l
|
|||
theorem Sublist.eq_of_length_le (s : l₁ <+ l₂) (h : length l₂ ≤ length l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
|
||||
s.eq_of_length <| Nat.le_antisymm s.length_le h
|
||||
|
||||
theorem Sublist.length_eq (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : length l₁ = length l₂ ↔ l₁ = l₂ :=
|
||||
⟨s.eq_of_length, congrArg _⟩
|
||||
|
||||
protected theorem Sublist.map (f : α → β) {l₁ l₂} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : map f l₁ <+ map f l₂ := by
|
||||
induction s with
|
||||
| slnil => simp
|
||||
|
|
@ -2824,10 +2887,10 @@ end insert
|
|||
theorem eraseP_cons (a : α) (l : List α) :
|
||||
(a :: l).eraseP p = bif p a then l else a :: l.eraseP p := rfl
|
||||
|
||||
@[simp] theorem eraseP_cons_of_pos {l : List α} (p) (h : p a) : (a :: l).eraseP p = l := by
|
||||
@[simp] theorem eraseP_cons_of_pos {l : List α} {p} (h : p a) : (a :: l).eraseP p = l := by
|
||||
simp [eraseP_cons, h]
|
||||
|
||||
@[simp] theorem eraseP_cons_of_neg {l : List α} (p) (h : ¬p a) :
|
||||
@[simp] theorem eraseP_cons_of_neg {l : List α} {p} (h : ¬p a) :
|
||||
(a :: l).eraseP p = a :: l.eraseP p := by simp [eraseP_cons, h]
|
||||
|
||||
theorem eraseP_of_forall_not {l : List α} (h : ∀ a, a ∈ l → ¬p a) : l.eraseP p = l := by
|
||||
|
|
@ -2858,22 +2921,18 @@ theorem exists_or_eq_self_of_eraseP (p) (l : List α) :
|
|||
.inl (eraseP_of_forall_not (h ⟨·, ·, ·⟩))
|
||||
|
||||
@[simp] theorem length_eraseP_of_mem (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
|
||||
length (l.eraseP p) = Nat.pred (length l) := by
|
||||
length (l.eraseP p) = length l - 1 := by
|
||||
let ⟨_, l₁, l₂, _, _, e₁, e₂⟩ := exists_of_eraseP al pa
|
||||
rw [e₂]; simp [length_append, e₁]; rfl
|
||||
|
||||
theorem eraseP_append_left {a : α} (pa : p a) :
|
||||
∀ {l₁ : List α} l₂, a ∈ l₁ → (l₁++l₂).eraseP p = l₁.eraseP p ++ l₂
|
||||
| x :: xs, l₂, h => by
|
||||
by_cases h' : p x <;> simp [h']
|
||||
rw [eraseP_append_left pa l₂ ((mem_cons.1 h).resolve_left (mt _ h'))]
|
||||
intro | rfl => exact pa
|
||||
|
||||
theorem eraseP_append_right :
|
||||
∀ {l₁ : List α} l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬p b) → eraseP p (l₁++l₂) = l₁ ++ l₂.eraseP p
|
||||
| [], l₂, _ => rfl
|
||||
| x :: xs, l₂, h => by
|
||||
simp [(forall_mem_cons.1 h).1, eraseP_append_right _ (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
|
||||
theorem length_eraseP {l : List α} : (l.eraseP p).length = if l.any p then l.length - 1 else l.length := by
|
||||
split <;> rename_i h
|
||||
· simp only [any_eq_true] at h
|
||||
obtain ⟨x, m, h⟩ := h
|
||||
simp [length_eraseP_of_mem m h]
|
||||
· simp only [any_eq_true] at h
|
||||
rw [eraseP_of_forall_not]
|
||||
simp_all
|
||||
|
||||
theorem eraseP_sublist (l : List α) : l.eraseP p <+ l := by
|
||||
match exists_or_eq_self_of_eraseP p l with
|
||||
|
|
@ -2904,10 +2963,126 @@ theorem mem_of_mem_eraseP {l : List α} : a ∈ l.eraseP p → a ∈ l := (erase
|
|||
have : a ≠ c := fun h => (h ▸ pa).elim h₂
|
||||
simp [this] at al; simp [al]
|
||||
|
||||
@[simp] theorem eraseP_eq_self_iff {p} {l : List α} : l.eraseP p = l ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, ¬ p a := by
|
||||
rw [← Sublist.length_eq (eraseP_sublist l), length_eraseP]
|
||||
split <;> rename_i h
|
||||
· simp only [any_eq_true, length_eq_zero] at h
|
||||
constructor
|
||||
· intro; simp_all [Nat.sub_one_eq_self]
|
||||
· intro; obtain ⟨x, m, h⟩ := h; simp_all
|
||||
· simp_all
|
||||
|
||||
theorem eraseP_map (f : β → α) : ∀ (l : List β), (map f l).eraseP p = map f (l.eraseP (p ∘ f))
|
||||
| [] => rfl
|
||||
| b::l => by by_cases h : p (f b) <;> simp [h, eraseP_map f l, eraseP_cons_of_pos]
|
||||
|
||||
theorem eraseP_filterMap (f : α → Option β) : ∀ (l : List α),
|
||||
(filterMap f l).eraseP p = filterMap f (l.eraseP (fun x => match f x with | some y => p y | none => false))
|
||||
| [] => rfl
|
||||
| a::l => by
|
||||
rw [filterMap_cons, eraseP_cons]
|
||||
split <;> rename_i h
|
||||
· simp [h, eraseP_filterMap]
|
||||
· rename_i b
|
||||
rw [h, eraseP_cons]
|
||||
by_cases w : p b
|
||||
· simp [w]
|
||||
· simp only [w, cond_false]
|
||||
rw [filterMap_cons_some h, eraseP_filterMap]
|
||||
|
||||
theorem eraseP_filter (f : α → Bool) (l : List α) :
|
||||
(filter f l).eraseP p = filter f (l.eraseP (fun x => p x && f x)) := by
|
||||
rw [← filterMap_eq_filter, eraseP_filterMap]
|
||||
congr
|
||||
ext x
|
||||
simp only [Option.guard]
|
||||
split <;> split at * <;> simp_all
|
||||
|
||||
theorem eraseP_append_left {a : α} (pa : p a) :
|
||||
∀ {l₁ : List α} l₂, a ∈ l₁ → (l₁++l₂).eraseP p = l₁.eraseP p ++ l₂
|
||||
| x :: xs, l₂, h => by
|
||||
by_cases h' : p x <;> simp [h']
|
||||
rw [eraseP_append_left pa l₂ ((mem_cons.1 h).resolve_left (mt _ h'))]
|
||||
intro | rfl => exact pa
|
||||
|
||||
theorem eraseP_append_right :
|
||||
∀ {l₁ : List α} l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬p b) → eraseP p (l₁++l₂) = l₁ ++ l₂.eraseP p
|
||||
| [], l₂, _ => rfl
|
||||
| x :: xs, l₂, h => by
|
||||
simp [(forall_mem_cons.1 h).1, eraseP_append_right _ (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
|
||||
|
||||
theorem eraseP_append (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
|
||||
(l₁ ++ l₂).eraseP p = if l₁.any p then l₁.eraseP p ++ l₂ else l₁ ++ l₂.eraseP p := by
|
||||
split <;> rename_i h
|
||||
· simp only [any_eq_true] at h
|
||||
obtain ⟨x, m, h⟩ := h
|
||||
rw [eraseP_append_left h _ m]
|
||||
· simp only [any_eq_true] at h
|
||||
rw [eraseP_append_right _]
|
||||
simp_all
|
||||
|
||||
theorem eraseP_eq_iff {p} {l : List α} :
|
||||
l.eraseP p = l' ↔
|
||||
((∀ a ∈ l, ¬ p a) ∧ l = l') ∨
|
||||
∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬ p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l' = l₁ ++ l₂ := by
|
||||
cases exists_or_eq_self_of_eraseP p l with
|
||||
| inl h =>
|
||||
constructor
|
||||
· intro h'
|
||||
left
|
||||
exact ⟨eraseP_eq_self_iff.1 h, by simp_all⟩
|
||||
· rintro (⟨-, rfl⟩ | ⟨a, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, rfl, rfl⟩)
|
||||
· assumption
|
||||
· rw [eraseP_append_right _ h₁, eraseP_cons_of_pos h₂]
|
||||
| inr h =>
|
||||
obtain ⟨a, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, w₁, w₂⟩ := h
|
||||
rw [w₂]
|
||||
subst w₁
|
||||
constructor
|
||||
· rintro rfl
|
||||
right
|
||||
refine ⟨a, l₁, l₂, ?_⟩
|
||||
simp_all
|
||||
· rintro (h | h)
|
||||
· simp_all
|
||||
· obtain ⟨a', l₁', l₂', h₁', h₂', h, rfl⟩ := h
|
||||
have p : l₁ = l₁' := by
|
||||
have q : l₁ = takeWhile (fun x => !p x) (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) := by
|
||||
rw [takeWhile_append_of_pos (by simp_all),
|
||||
takeWhile_cons_of_neg (by simp [h₂]), append_nil]
|
||||
have q' : l₁' = takeWhile (fun x => !p x) (l₁' ++ a' :: l₂') := by
|
||||
rw [takeWhile_append_of_pos (by simpa using h₁'),
|
||||
takeWhile_cons_of_neg (by simp [h₂']), append_nil]
|
||||
simp [h] at q
|
||||
rw [q', q]
|
||||
subst p
|
||||
simp_all
|
||||
|
||||
@[simp] theorem eraseP_replicate_of_pos {n : Nat} {a : α} (h : p a) :
|
||||
(replicate n a).eraseP p = replicate (n - 1) a := by
|
||||
cases n <;> simp [replicate_succ, h]
|
||||
|
||||
@[simp] theorem eraseP_replicate_of_neg {n : Nat} {a : α} (h : ¬p a) :
|
||||
(replicate n a).eraseP p = replicate n a := by
|
||||
rw [eraseP_of_forall_not (by simp_all)]
|
||||
|
||||
theorem Nodup.eraseP [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] (p) : Nodup l → Nodup (l.eraseP p) :=
|
||||
Nodup.sublist <| eraseP_sublist _
|
||||
|
||||
theorem eraseP_comm {l : List α} (h : ∀ a ∈ l, ¬ p a ∨ ¬ q a) :
|
||||
(l.eraseP p).eraseP q = (l.eraseP q).eraseP p := by
|
||||
induction l with
|
||||
| nil => rfl
|
||||
| cons a l ih =>
|
||||
simp only [eraseP_cons]
|
||||
by_cases h₁ : p a
|
||||
· by_cases h₂ : q a
|
||||
· simp_all
|
||||
· simp [h₁, h₂, ih (fun b m => h b (mem_cons_of_mem _ m))]
|
||||
· by_cases h₂ : q a
|
||||
· simp [h₁, h₂, ih (fun b m => h b (mem_cons_of_mem _ m))]
|
||||
· simp [h₁, h₂, ih (fun b m => h b (mem_cons_of_mem _ m))]
|
||||
|
||||
/-! ### erase -/
|
||||
section erase
|
||||
variable [BEq α]
|
||||
|
|
@ -2915,7 +3090,7 @@ variable [BEq α]
|
|||
@[simp] theorem erase_cons_head [LawfulBEq α] (a : α) (l : List α) : (a :: l).erase a = l := by
|
||||
simp [erase_cons]
|
||||
|
||||
@[simp] theorem erase_cons_tail {a b : α} (l : List α) (h : ¬(b == a)) :
|
||||
@[simp] theorem erase_cons_tail {a b : α} {l : List α} (h : ¬(b == a)) :
|
||||
(b :: l).erase a = b :: l.erase a := by simp only [erase_cons, if_neg h]
|
||||
|
||||
theorem erase_of_not_mem [LawfulBEq α] {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, a ∉ l → l.erase a = l
|
||||
|
|
@ -2945,14 +3120,13 @@ theorem exists_erase_eq [LawfulBEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
|
|||
length (l.erase a) = length l - 1 := by
|
||||
rw [erase_eq_eraseP]; exact length_eraseP_of_mem h (beq_self_eq_true a)
|
||||
|
||||
theorem erase_sublist (a : α) (l : List α) : l.erase a <+ l := by
|
||||
induction l with
|
||||
| nil => simp
|
||||
| cons b l ih =>
|
||||
simp only [erase_cons]
|
||||
split
|
||||
· exact sublist_cons b l
|
||||
· exact cons_sublist_cons.mpr ih
|
||||
theorem length_erase [LawfulBEq α] (a : α) (l : List α) :
|
||||
length (l.erase a) = if a ∈ l then length l - 1 else length l := by
|
||||
rw [erase_eq_eraseP, length_eraseP]
|
||||
split <;> split <;> simp_all
|
||||
|
||||
theorem erase_sublist (a : α) (l : List α) : l.erase a <+ l :=
|
||||
erase_eq_eraseP' a l ▸ eraseP_sublist ..
|
||||
|
||||
theorem erase_subset (a : α) (l : List α) : l.erase a ⊆ l := (erase_sublist a l).subset
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -2965,6 +3139,28 @@ theorem mem_of_mem_erase {a b : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l.erase b) : a ∈
|
|||
a ∈ l.erase b ↔ a ∈ l :=
|
||||
erase_eq_eraseP b l ▸ mem_eraseP_of_neg (mt eq_of_beq ab.symm)
|
||||
|
||||
@[simp] theorem erase_eq_self_iff [LawfulBEq α] {l : List α} : l.erase a = l ↔ a ∉ l := by
|
||||
rw [erase_eq_eraseP', eraseP_eq_self_iff]
|
||||
simp
|
||||
|
||||
theorem erase_filter [LawfulBEq α] (f : α → Bool) (l : List α) :
|
||||
(filter f l).erase a = filter f (l.erase a) := by
|
||||
induction l with
|
||||
| nil => rfl
|
||||
| cons x xs ih =>
|
||||
by_cases h : a = x
|
||||
· rw [erase_cons]
|
||||
simp only [h, beq_self_eq_true, ↓reduceIte]
|
||||
rw [filter_cons]
|
||||
split
|
||||
· rw [erase_cons_head]
|
||||
· rw [erase_of_not_mem]
|
||||
simp_all [mem_filter]
|
||||
· rw [erase_cons_tail (by simpa using Ne.symm h), filter_cons, filter_cons]
|
||||
split
|
||||
· rw [erase_cons_tail (by simpa using Ne.symm h), ih]
|
||||
· rw [ih]
|
||||
|
||||
theorem erase_append_left [LawfulBEq α] {l₁ : List α} (l₂) (h : a ∈ l₁) :
|
||||
(l₁ ++ l₂).erase a = l₁.erase a ++ l₂ := by
|
||||
simp [erase_eq_eraseP]; exact eraseP_append_left (beq_self_eq_true a) l₂ h
|
||||
|
|
@ -2974,6 +3170,10 @@ theorem erase_append_right [LawfulBEq α] {a : α} {l₁ : List α} (l₂ : List
|
|||
rw [erase_eq_eraseP, erase_eq_eraseP, eraseP_append_right]
|
||||
intros b h' h''; rw [eq_of_beq h''] at h; exact h h'
|
||||
|
||||
theorem erase_append [LawfulBEq α] {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
|
||||
(l₁ ++ l₂).erase a = if a ∈ l₁ then l₁.erase a ++ l₂ else l₁ ++ l₂.erase a := by
|
||||
simp [erase_eq_eraseP, eraseP_append]
|
||||
|
||||
theorem erase_comm [LawfulBEq α] (a b : α) (l : List α) :
|
||||
(l.erase a).erase b = (l.erase b).erase a := by
|
||||
if ab : a == b then rw [eq_of_beq ab] else ?_
|
||||
|
|
@ -2988,7 +3188,21 @@ theorem erase_comm [LawfulBEq α] (a b : α) (l : List α) :
|
|||
erase_append_right _ (mt mem_of_mem_erase ha'), erase_cons_head]
|
||||
else
|
||||
rw [erase_append_right _ h₁, erase_append_right _ h₁, erase_append_right _ ha',
|
||||
erase_cons_tail _ ab, erase_cons_head]
|
||||
erase_cons_tail ab, erase_cons_head]
|
||||
|
||||
theorem erase_eq_iff [LawfulBEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} :
|
||||
l.erase a = l' ↔
|
||||
(a ∉ l ∧ l = l') ∨
|
||||
∃ l₁ l₂, a ∉ l₁ ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l' = l₁ ++ l₂ := by
|
||||
rw [erase_eq_eraseP', eraseP_eq_iff]
|
||||
simp only [beq_iff_eq, forall_mem_ne', exists_and_left]
|
||||
constructor
|
||||
· rintro (⟨h, rfl⟩ | ⟨a', l', h, rfl, x, rfl, rfl⟩)
|
||||
· left; simp_all
|
||||
· right; refine ⟨l', h, x, by simp⟩
|
||||
· rintro (⟨h, rfl⟩ | ⟨l₁, h, x, rfl, rfl⟩)
|
||||
· left; simp_all
|
||||
· right; refine ⟨a, l₁, h, by simp⟩
|
||||
|
||||
@[simp] theorem erase_replicate_self [LawfulBEq α] {a : α} :
|
||||
(replicate n a).erase a = replicate (n - 1) a := by
|
||||
|
|
@ -3006,7 +3220,7 @@ theorem Nodup.erase_eq_filter [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] {l} (d : Nodup l) (a : α)
|
|||
rename_i b l
|
||||
by_cases h : b = a
|
||||
· subst h
|
||||
rw [erase_cons_head, filter_cons_of_neg _ (by simp)]
|
||||
rw [erase_cons_head, filter_cons_of_neg (by simp)]
|
||||
apply Eq.symm
|
||||
rw [filter_eq_self]
|
||||
simpa [@eq_comm α] using m
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -634,6 +634,10 @@ theorem succ_lt_succ_iff : succ a < succ b ↔ a < b := ⟨lt_of_succ_lt_succ, s
|
|||
|
||||
theorem add_one_inj : a + 1 = b + 1 ↔ a = b := succ_inj'
|
||||
|
||||
theorem ne_add_one (n : Nat) : n ≠ n + 1 := fun h => by cases h
|
||||
|
||||
theorem add_one_ne (n : Nat) : n + 1 ≠ n := fun h => by cases h
|
||||
|
||||
theorem add_one_le_add_one_iff : a + 1 ≤ b + 1 ↔ a ≤ b := succ_le_succ_iff
|
||||
|
||||
theorem add_one_lt_add_one_iff : a + 1 < b + 1 ↔ a < b := succ_lt_succ_iff
|
||||
|
|
@ -815,6 +819,9 @@ protected theorem pred_succ (n : Nat) : pred n.succ = n := rfl
|
|||
@[simp] protected theorem zero_sub_one : 0 - 1 = 0 := rfl
|
||||
@[simp] protected theorem add_one_sub_one (n : Nat) : n + 1 - 1 = n := rfl
|
||||
|
||||
theorem sub_one_eq_self (n : Nat) : n - 1 = n ↔ n = 0 := by cases n <;> simp [ne_add_one]
|
||||
theorem eq_self_sub_one (n : Nat) : n = n - 1 ↔ n = 0 := by cases n <;> simp [add_one_ne]
|
||||
|
||||
theorem succ_pred {a : Nat} (h : a ≠ 0) : a.pred.succ = a := by
|
||||
induction a with
|
||||
| zero => contradiction
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -295,6 +295,8 @@ theorem not_forall_of_exists_not {p : α → Prop} : (∃ x, ¬p x) → ¬∀ x,
|
|||
|
||||
@[simp] theorem exists_eq_left' : (∃ a, a' = a ∧ p a) ↔ p a' := by simp [@eq_comm _ a']
|
||||
|
||||
@[simp] theorem exists_eq_right' : (∃ a, p a ∧ a' = a) ↔ p a' := by simp [@eq_comm _ a']
|
||||
|
||||
@[simp] theorem forall_eq_or_imp : (∀ a, a = a' ∨ q a → p a) ↔ p a' ∧ ∀ a, q a → p a := by
|
||||
simp only [or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq]
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue