This PR splits `Lean.Grind.CommRing` into 4 typeclasses, for semirings
and noncommutative rings. This does not yet change the behaviour of
`grind`, which expects to find all 4 typeclasses. Later we will make
some generalizations.
This PR stops `dsimp` from visiting proof terms, which should make
`simp` and `dsimp` more efficient.
In this attempt I have `dsimp` leave the proofs in place as-is, instead
of simplifying the proof type.
Closes#6960
This PR refines the new wording of the "application type mismatch" error
message to avoid ambiguity in references to the "final" argument in a
subexpression that may be followed by additional arguments.
It does so by replacing "final" with "last," rephrasing the message so
that this adjective modifies the argument itself rather than the word
"argument," and only displaying this wording when two arguments could be
confused (determined by expression equality).
These changes were motivated by a report that in cases where a function
application `f a b c` fails to elaborate because `b` is incorrectly
typed, the existing error message's reference to `b` being the "final"
argument in the application `f a b` may create confusion because it is
not the final argument in the full application expression.
This PR improves support for structure extensionality in `grind`. It now
uses eta expansion for structures instead of the extensionality theorems
generated by `[ext]`. Examples:
```lean
opaque f (a : Nat) : Nat × Bool
attribute [grind ext] Prod Subtype
example (a b : Nat) : (f a).1 = (f b).1 → (f a).2 = (f b).2 → f a = f b := by
grind
def g (a : Nat) : { x : Nat // x > 1 } :=
⟨a + 2, by grind⟩
example (a b : Nat) : (g a).1 = (g b).1 → g a = g b := by
grind
@[grind ext] structure S where
x : Nat
y : Int
example (x y : S) : x.1 = y.1 → x.2 = y.2 → x = y := by
grind
```
This PR adds the instances `Grind.CommRing (Fin n)` and `Grind.IsCharP
(Fin n) n`. New tests:
```lean
example (x y z : Fin 13) :
(x + y + z) ^ 2 = x ^ 2 + y ^ 2 + z ^ 2 + 2 * (x * y + y * z + z * x) := by
grind +ring
example (x y : Fin 17) : (x + y) ^ 3 = x ^ 3 + y ^ 3 + 3 * x * y * (x + y) := by
grind +ring
example (x y : Fin 19) : (x - y) * (x ^ 2 + x * y + y ^ 2) = x ^ 3 - y ^ 3 := by
grind +ring
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Kim Morrison <kim@tqft.net>
This PR makes `fun_induction` and `fun_cases` (try to) unfold the
function application of interest in the goal. The old behavior can be
enabled with `set_option tactic.fun_induction.unfolding false`. For
`fun_cases` this does not work yet when the function’s result type
depends on one of the arguments, see issue #8296.
This PR makes it possible for `bv_decide` to tackle situations for its
enum type preprocessing where the enums themselves are use in a
dependently type context (for example inside of a `GetElem` body) and
thus not trivially accessible to `simp` for rewriting. To do this we
drop`GetElem` on `BitVec` as well as `dite` as early as possible in the
pipeline.
This PR lets `cases` fail gracefully when the motive has an complex
argument whose type is dependent type on the targets. While the
`induction` tactic can handle this well, `cases` does not. This change
at least gracefully degrades to not instantiating that motive parameter.
See issue #8296 for more details on this issue.
This PR improves the generation of `.induct_unfolding` by rewriting
`match` statements more reliably, using the new “congruence equations”
introduced in #8284. Fixes#8195.
This PR adds a new variant of equations for matchers, namely “congruence
equations” that generalize the normal matcher equations. They have
unrestricted left-hand-sides, extra equality assumptions relating the
discriminiants with the patterns and thus prove heterogenous equalities.
In that sense they combine congruence with rewriting. They can be used
to rewrite matcher applications where, due to dependencies, `simp` would
fail to rewrite the discriminants, and will be used when producing the
unfolding induction theorems.
This PR improves the type-as-hole error message. Type-as-hole error for
theorem declarations should not admit the possibility of omitting the
type entirely.
---------
Co-authored-by: Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de>
This PR changes `addPPExplicitToExposeDiff` to show universe differences
and to visit into projections, e.g.:
```
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, the left-hand side
(Test.mk (∀ (x : PUnit.{1}), True)).1
is not definitionally equal to the right-hand side
(Test.mk (∀ (x : PUnit.{2}), True)).1
```
for
```lean
inductive Test where
| mk (x : Prop)
example : (Test.mk (∀ _ : PUnit.{1}, True)).1 = (Test.mk (∀ _ : PUnit.{2}, True)).1 := by
rfl
```
This PR makes `#guard_msgs` to treat `trace` messages separate from
`info`, `warning` and `error`. It also introduce the ability to say
`#guard_msgs (pass info`, like `(drop info)` so far, and also adds
`(check info)` as the explicit form of `(info)`, for completeness.
Fixes#8266
This PR adjusts the error message when `apply` fails to unify. It is
clearer about distinguishing the term being applied and the goal, as
well as distinguishing the "conclusion" of the given term and the term
itself.
---------
Co-authored-by: Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de>
This PR rewords the `application type mismatch` error message by more
specifically mentioning that the problem is with the final argument.
This is useful when the same argument is passed to the function multiple
times.
We decided against using a wording which specifically mentions the
"function expression", because users who are not used to currying might
not think of the `f a` in `f a b` as a function.
This PR adds additional infrastructure for error message formatting.
Specifically, it adds convenience formatters for hints and notes,
including the ability to attach code actions to hint messages using a
"Try This"-like widget, along with several convenience formatters for
message data.
---------
Co-authored-by: Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de>
This PR fixes unintended inlining of `ToJson`, `FromJson`, and `Repr`
instances, which was causing exponential compilation times in `deriving`
clauses for large structures.
This PR omits cases from functional induction/cases principles that are
implemented `by contradiction` (or, more generally, `False.elim`,
`absurd` or `noConfusion). Breaking change in the sense that there are
fewer goals to prove after using functional induction.
Fixes#8103.
This PR fixes an issue in the theory propagation used in `grind`. When
two equivalence classes are merged, the core may need to push additional
equalities or disequalities down to the satellite theory solvers (e.g.,
`cutsat`, `comm ring`, etc). Some solvers (e.g. `cutsat`) assume that
all of the core’s invariants hold before they receive those facts.
Propagating immediately therefore risks violating a solver’s
pre-conditions midway through the merge. To decouple the merge operation
from propagation and to keep the core solver-agnostic, this PR adds the
helper type `PendingTheoryPropagation`.
This PR improves the E-matching pattern inference procedure in `grind`.
Consider the following theorem:
```lean
@[grind →]
theorem eq_empty_of_append_eq_empty {xs ys : Array α} (h : xs ++ ys = #[]) : xs = #[] ∧ ys = #[] :=
append_eq_empty_iff.mp h
```
Before this PR, `grind` inferred the following pattern:
```lean
@HAppend.hAppend _ _ _ _ #2#1
```
Note that this pattern would match any `++` application, even if it had
nothing to do with arrays. With this PR, the inferred pattern becomes:
```lean
@HAppend.hAppend (Array #3) (Array _) (Array _) _ #2#1
```
With the new pattern, the theorem will not be considered by `grind` for
goals that do not involve `Array`s.
This PR implements **stepwise proof terms** in the commutative ring
procedure used by `grind`. These terms serve as an alternative
representation to the traditional Nullstellensatz certificates, aiming
to address the **exponential worst-case complexity** often associated
with certificate construction.
While various compression techniques for Nullstellensatz certificates
exist, they are not implemented in our procedure. Moreover, many of
these techniques rely on additional properties not available in
arbitrary commutative rings. In contrast, the stepwise proof terms
encode the **actual derivation** used during simplification, offering
significantly better scalability in practice.
Here is a motivating example:
```lean
example {α} [CommRing α] [IsCharP α 0] (d t c : α) (d_inv PSO3_inv : α)
(Δ40 : d^2 * (d + t - d * t - 2) * (d + t + d * t) = 0)
(Δ41 : -d^4 * (d + t - d * t - 2) *
(2 * d + 2 * d * t - 4 * d * t^2 + 2 * d * t^4 + 2 * d^2 * t^4 - c * (d + t + d * t)) = 0)
(_ : d * d_inv = 1)
(_ : (d + t - d * t - 2) * PSO3_inv = 1) :
t^2 = t + 1 := by grind +ring
```
In this case, the Nullstellensatz certificate generated by our procedure
contains **over 20,000 terms**, which overwhelms the Lean kernel during
verification. @kim-em also computed certificates using Mathematica with
various variable orderings, producing results between **500 and 2,000
terms**: still quite large.
By switching to stepwise derivations:
- `grind` completes the goal in **under 10 ms**
- The Lean kernel checks the resulting proof term in **under 1 second**
This change dramatically improves both the performance and robustness of
`grind` for nontrivial algebraic goals.
