This PR changes how match splitters are generated: Rather than rewriting
the match statement, the match compilation pipeline is used again.
The benefits are:
* Re-doing the match compilation means we can do more intelligent book
keeping, e.g. prove overlap assumptions only once and re-use the proof,
or prune the context of the MVar to speed up `contradiction`. This may
have allowed a different solution than #11200.
* It would unblock #11105, as the existing splitter implementation would
have trouble dealing with the matchers produced that way.
* It provides the necessary machinery also for source-exposed “none of
the above” bindings, a feature that we probably want at some point (and
we mostly need to find good syntax for, see #3136, although maybe I
should open a dedicated RFC).
* It allows us to skip costly things during matcher creation that would
only be useful for the splitter, and thus allows performance
improvements like #11508.
* We can drop the existing implementation.
It’s not entirely free:
* We have to run `simpH` twice, once for the match equations and once
for the splitter.
This PR extracts some refactorings from #10763, including dropping dead
code and not failing in `inaccessibleAsCtor`, which leadas to (slightly)
better error messages, and also on the grounds that the failing
alternative may actually be unreachable.
