This PR updates `rw?`, `show_term`, and other tactic-suggesting tactics
to suggest `expose_names` when necessary and validate tactics prior to
suggesting them, as `exact?` already did, and it also ensures all such
tactics produce hover info in the messages showing tactic suggestions.
This introduces a breaking change in the `TryThis` API: the `type?`
parameter of `addRewriteSuggestion` is now an `LOption`, not an
`Option`, to obviate the need for a hack we previously used to indicate
that a rewrite closed the goal.
Closes#7350
This PR prevents `exact?` and `apply?` from suggesting tactics that
correspond to correct proofs but do not elaborate, and it allows these
tactics to suggest `expose_names` when needed.
These tactics now indicate that a non-compiling term was generated but
do not suggest that that term be inserted. `exact?` also no longer
suggests that the user try `apply?` if no partial suggestions were
found.
This addresses part of #5407 but does not achieve the exact expected
behavior therein (due to #6122).
Rather than adding symm hypotheses to the local context, it now adds
them to the list of hypotheses derived from the local context.
This is not ideal for performance reasons, but it at least closes#3922.
In the future, solveByElim could maintain its own cache of facts that it
updates whenever it does intro.
