This PR rewords the `application type mismatch` error message by more
specifically mentioning that the problem is with the final argument.
This is useful when the same argument is passed to the function multiple
times.
We decided against using a wording which specifically mentions the
"function expression", because users who are not used to currying might
not think of the `f a` in `f a b` as a function.
This PR adjusts the way the pretty printer unresolves names. It used to
make use of all `export`s when pretty printing, but now it only uses
`export`s that put names into parent namespaces (heuristic: these are
"API exports" that are intended by the library author), rather than
"horizontal exports" that put the names into an unrelated namespace,
which the dot notation feature in #6189 now incentivizes.
Closes the already closed#2524
This PR changes how generalized field notation ("dot notation") resolves
the function. The new resolution rule is that if `x : S`, then `x.f`
resolves the name `S.f` relative to the root namespace (hence it now
affected by `export` and `open`). Breaking change: aliases now resolve
differently. Before, if `x : S`, and if `S.f` is an alias for `S'.f`,
then `x.f` would use `S'.f` and look for an argument of type `S'`. Now,
it looks for an argument of type `S`, which is more generally useful
behavior. Code making use of the old behavior should consider defining
`S` or `S'` in terms of the other, since dot notation can unfold
definitions during resolution.
This also fixes a bug in explicit-mode generalized field notation
(`@x.f`) where `x` could be passed as the wrong argument. This was not a
bug for explicit-mode structure projections.
Closes#3031. Addresses the `Function` namespace issue in #1629.
Many of our tests in `tests/lean/run/` produce output from `#eval` (or
`#check`) statements, that is then ignored.
This PR tries to capture all the useful output using `#guard_msgs`. I've
only done a cursory check that the output is still sane --- there is a
chance that some "unchecked" tests have already accumulated regressions
and this just cements them!
In the other direction, I did identify two rotten tests:
* a minor one in `setStructInstNotation.lean`, where a comment says `Set
Nat`, but `#check` actually prints `?_`. Weird?
* `CompilerProbe.lean` is generating empty output, apparently indicating
that something is broken, but I don't know the signficance of this file.
In any case, I'll ask about these elsewhere.
(This started by noticing that a recent `grind` test file had an
untested `trace_state`, and then got carried away.)
