The trace class Meta.synthInstance.answer isn't registered, so it can't
be used.
I set `inherited := true`, because I think it is a useful trace to have.
In particular it tells you when an instance has been found that has a
too large size. This is very useful information.
Summary:
- Take `synthPendingDepth` into account when caching TC results
- Add `maxSynthPendingDepth` option with default := 2.
- Add support for tracking `synthPending` failures when using
`set_option diagnostics true`
closes#2522closes#3313closes#3927
Identical to #4114 but with `maxSynthPendingDepth := 1`
closes#4114
cc @semorrison
This reverts commit 706a4cfd73 introduced
in #3970
As explained in #4124, `findM?` can become a footgun if used in monads
which induce side-effects such as caching. This PR removes that
function, and fixes the code introduced by #3398 for which the function
was first added.
cc @semorrison.
Closes#3386
Currently, when generating the signature of an injectivity lemma for a
certain constructor `c : forall xs, Foo a_1 ... a_n`,
`mkInjectiveTheoremTypeCore?` will differentiate between variables which
are bound to stay the same between the two equal values (i.e inductive
indices), and non-fixed ones. To do that, the function currently checks
whether a variable `x ∈ xs` appears in the final co-domain `Foo a_1 ...
a_n` of the constructor. This condition isn't enough however. As shown
in the linked issue, the codomain may also depend on variables which
appears in the type of free vars contained in `Foo a_1 ... a_n`, but not
in the term itself. This PR fixes the issue by also checking the types
of any free variable occuring in the final codomain, so as to ensure
injectivity lemmas are well-typed.
Because of the last-added-tried-first rule for macros, all the special
purpose `decreasing_trivial` rules are tried for most recursive
definitions out there, and because they use `apply` and `assumption`
with default transparency may cause some definitoins to be unfolded over
and over again.
A quick test with one of the functions in the leansat project shows that
elaboration time goes down from 600ms to 375ms when using
```
decreasing_by all_goals decreasing_with with_reducible decreasing_trivial
```
instead of
```
decreasing_by all_goals decreasing_with decreasing_trivial
```
This change uses `with_reducible` in most of these macros.
This means that these tactics will no longer work when the
relations/definitions they look for is hidden behind a definition.
This affected in particular `Array.sizeOf_get`, which now has a
companion `sizeOf_getElem`.
In addition, there were three tactics using `apply` to apply Nat-related
lemmas
that we now expect `omega` to solve. We still need them when building
`Init` modules
that don’t have access to `omega`, but they now live in
`decreasing_trivial_pre_omega`,
meant to be only used internally.
It currently only reports how many times each declaration has been
unfolded, and how often the `isDefEq` heuristic for `f a =?= f b` has
been used. Only counters above the threshold are reported.
We add a new configuration flag for `isDefEq`:
`Meta.Config.univApprox`.
When it is true, we approximate the solution for universe constraints
such as
- `u =?= max u ?v`, we use `?v := u`, and ignore the solution `?v := 0`.
- `max u v =?= max u ?w`, we use `?w := v`, and ignore the solution `?w
:= max u v`.
We only apply these approximations when there the contraints cannot be
postponed anymore. These approximations prevent error messages such as
```
error: stuck at solving universe constraint
max u ?u.3430 =?= u
```
This kind of error seems to appear in several Mathlib files.
We currently do not use these approximations while synthesizing type
class instances.
Currently this will fail in two tests, because of changes in #3965.
* Sometimes we need to add an additional universe annotation, or we get
a `stuck at solving universe constraint max u ?u =?= u`.
* Sometimes we need to specify arguments that could previously be found
by unification.
---------
Co-authored-by: Leonardo de Moura <leomoura@amazon.com>
previously, the empty `MessageData` (`m!""`) was used to indicate “no
message”, and `throwTacticEx` would format the message differently then.
But the semantics of `MessageData.isEmpty` isn't entirely clear in the
presence of lazy message data (e.g. `.ofPPFormat`).
So to avoid wondering what `isEmpty` should do there, let's simply use
an optional argument to `throwTacticEx` and get rid of
`MessageData.isEmpty`.
