This PR fixes a regression where goals that don't exist were being
displayed. The regression was triggered by #5835 and originally caused
by #4926.
Bug originally reported at
https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/270676-lean4/topic/tactic.20doesn't.20change.20primary.20goal.20state/near/488957772.
The cause of this issue was that #5835 made certain `SourceInfo`s
canonical, which was directly transferred to several `TacticInfo`s by
#4926. The goal state selection mechanism would then pick up these extra
`TacticInfo`s.
The approach taken by this PR is to ensure that the `SourceInfo` that is
being transferred by #4926 is noncanonical.
This PR puts code in terms of syntax quotations now that there has been
a stage0 update. Fixes a lingering bug in StructInst where some
intermediate syntax was malformed, but this had no observable effects
outside of some debug messages.
This PR modifies structure instance notation and `where` notation to use
the same notation for fields. Structure instance notation now admits
binders, type ascriptions, and equations, and `where` notation admits
full structure lvals. Examples of these for structure instance notation:
```lean
structure PosFun where
f : Nat → Nat
pos : ∀ n, 0 < f n
def p : PosFun :=
{ f n := n + 1
pos := by simp }
def p' : PosFun :=
{ f | 0 => 1
| n + 1 => n + 1
pos := by rintro (_|_) <;> simp }
```
Just like for the structure `where` notation, a field `f x y z : ty :=
val` expands to `f := fun x y z => (val : ty)`. The type ascription is
optional.
The PR also is setting things up for future expansion. Pending some
discussion, in the future structure/`where` notation could have have
embedded `where` clauses; rather than `{ a := { x := 1, y := z } }` one
could write `{ a where x := 1; y := z }`.
This PR fixes a stack overflow caused by a cyclic assignment in the
metavariable context. The cycle is unintentionally introduced by the
structure instance elaborator.
closes#3150
This PR changes the signature of `Array.get` to take a Nat and a proof,
rather than a `Fin`, for consistency with the rest of the (planned)
Array API. Note that because of bootstrapping issues we can't provide
`get_elem_tactic` as an autoparameter for the proof. As users will
mostly use the `xs[i]` notation provided by `GetElem`, this hopefully
isn't a problem.
We may restore `Fin` based versions, either here or downstream, as
needed, but they won't be the "main" functions.
---------
Co-authored-by: David Thrane Christiansen <david@davidchristiansen.dk>
This default instance makes it possible to write things like `m!"the
constant is {.ofConstName n}"`.
Breaking change: This weakly causes terms to have a type of
`MessageData` if their type is otherwise unknown. For example:
* `m!"... {x} ..."` can cause `x` to have type `MessageData`, causing
the `let` definition of `x` to fail to elaborate. Fix: give `x` an
explicit type.
* Arithmetic expressions in `m!` strings may need a type ascription. For
example, if the type of `i` is unknown at the time the arithmetic
expression is elaborated, then `m!"... {i + 1} ..."` can fail saying
that it cannot find an `HAdd Nat Nat MessageData` instance. Two fixes:
either ensure that the type of `i` is known, or add a type ascription to
guide the `MessageData` coercion, like `m!"... {(i + 1 : Nat)} ..."`.
A step of expanding structure instances is to determine all the default
values, and part of this is reducing projections that appear in the
default values so that they get replaced with the user-provided values.
Binder types in foralls, lambdas, and lets have to be reduced too.
Closes#2186
Closes#3146
Reduction doesn't trigger correctly on the bodies of `let`-expressions
in `StructInst`, leading some meta-variables to linger in the terms of
some fields. Because of this, default fields may try multiple times (and
fail) to be generated, leading to an unexpected error.
The solution implemented here is to modify the values of the introduced
variables in the local context so as to reduce them correctly.
Now one can write `@x.f`, `@(x).f`, `@x.1`, `@(x).1`, and so on.
This fixes an issue where structure instance update notation (like `{x
with a := a'}`) could fail if the field `a` had a type with implicit,
optional, or auto parameters.
Closes#5406
Adds a mechanism where when an autoparam tactic fails to synthesize a
parameter, the associated parameter name or field name for the autoparam
is reported in an error.
Examples:
```text
could not synthesize default value for parameter 'h' using tactics
could not synthesize default value for field 'inv' of 'S' using tactics
```
Notes:
* Autoparams now run their tactics without any error recovery or
error-to-sorry enabled. This enables catching the error and reporting
the contextual information. This is justified on the grounds that
autoparams are not interactive.
* Autoparams for applications now cleanup the autoParam annotation,
bringing it in line with autoparams for structure fields.
* This preserves the old behavior that autoparams leave terminfo, but we
will revisit this after some imminent improvements to the unused
variable linter.
Closes#2950
Autoparam tactic scripts have no source positions, which until recently
made it so that any errors or messages would be logged at the current
ref, which was the application or structure instance being elaborated.
However, with the new incrementality features the ref is now carefully
managed to avoid leakage of outside data. This inhibits the elaborator's
ref from being used for the tactic's ref, causing messages to be placed
at the beginning of the file rather than on the syntax that triggered
the autoparam.
To fix this, now the elaborators insert the ref's source position
everywhere into the autoparam tactic script.
If in the future messages for synthetic tactics appear at the tops of
files in other contexts, we should consider an approach where
`Lean.Elab.Term.withReuseContext` uses something like `replaceRef` to
set the ref while disabling incrementality when the tactic does not
contain source position information.
Closes#4880
Modifies the structure instance elaborator to
1. Fill in missing fields from sources in strict left-to-right order. In
`{a, b with}`, sometimes the elaborator
would ignore `a` even if both `a` and `b` provided the same field,
depending on what subobject fields they had.
2. Use the sources, or subobjects of the sources, to fill in entire
subobjects of the target structure as much as possible.
Currently, a field cannot be filled directly by a source itself
resulting in the term being eta expanded.
This change avoids this unnecessary and surprisingly costly extra eta
expansion.
Adds two new tests to illustrate the performance benefit (one courtesy
@semorrison). These are currently failing on master and succeed on this
branch.
There is one additional test to exercise the changes to the elaboration
of structure instances.
Changes to make mathlib build are in leanprover-community/mathlib4#9843
Closes#2451
