This PR adds the new transparency setting `@[instance_reducible]`. We
used to check whether a declaration had `instance` reducibility by using
the `isInstance` predicate. However, this was not a robust solution
because:
- We have scoped instances, and `isInstance` returns `true` only if the
scope is active.
- We have auxiliary declarations used to construct instances manually,
such as:
```lean
def lt_wfRel : WellFoundedRelation Nat
```
`isInstance` also returns `false` for this kind of declaration.
In both cases, the declaration may be (or may have been) used to
construct an instance, but `isInstance`
returns `false`. Thus, we claim it is a mistake to check the
reducibility status using `isInstance`.
`isInstance` indicates whether a declaration is available for the type
class resolution mechanism,
not its transparency status.
**We are decoupling whether a declaration is available for type class
resolution from its transparency status.**
**Remak**: We need a update stage0 to complete this feature.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Ullrich <sebasti@nullri.ch>
This PR reverts a lot of the changes done in #8308. We practically
encountered situations such as:
```
fun y (z) :=
let x := inst
mkInst x z
f y
```
Where the instance puller turns it into:
```
let x := inst
fun y (z) :=
mkInst x z
f y
```
The current heuristic now discovers `x` being in scope at the call site
of `f` and being used under a binder in `y` and thus blocks pulling in
`x` to the specialization, abstracting over an instance.
According to @zwarich this was done at the time either due to observed
stack overflows or pulling in computation into loops. With the current
configuration for abstraction in specialization it seems rather unlikely
that we pull in a non trivial computation into a loop with this. We also
practically didn't observe stack overflows in our tests or benchmarks.
Cameron speculates that the issues he observed might've been fixed
otherwise by now.
Crucial note: Deciding not to abstract over ground terms *might* cause
us to pull in computationally intensive ground terms into a loop. We
could decide to weaken this to just instance terms though of course even
computing instances might end up being non-trivial.
This PR makes the compiler produce C code that statically initializes
close terms when possible. This change reduces startup time as the terms
are directly stored in the binary instead of getting computed at
startup.
The set of terms currently supported by this mechanism are:
- string literals
- ctors called with other statically initializeable arguments
- `Name.mkStrX` and other `Name` ctors as they require special support
due to their computed field and occur frequently due to name literals.
In core there are currently 152,524 closed terms and of these 103,929
(68%) get initialized statically with this PR. The remaining 48585 ones
are not extracted because they use (potentially transitively) various
non trivial pieces of code like `stringToMessageData` etc. We might
decide to add special support for these in the future but for the moment
this feels like it's overfitting too much for core.
This PR makes the automatic first token detection in tactic docs much
more robust, in addition to making it work in modules and other contexts
where builtin tactics are not in the environment. It also adds the
ability to override the tactic's first token as the user-visible name.
Previously, first token detection would look up the parser descriptor in
the environment and process its syntax. This would be incorrect for
builtin parsers, as well as for modules in which the definition is not
loaded. Now, it instead consults the Pratt parsing table for the
`tactic` syntax category. Tests are added that ensure this keeps working
in modules, and also that the first token of all tactics that ship with
Lean are either detected unambiguously or annotated to remove ambiguity.
Closes#12038.
Drastically speeds up `isTracingEnabledFor` in the common case, which
has evolved from "no options set" to "`Elab.async` and probably some
linter options set but no `trace`".
## Breaking changes
`Lean.Options` is now an opaque type. The basic but not all of the
`KVMap` API has been redefined on top of it.
This PR fixes the `floatLetIn` pass to not move variables in case it
could break linearity (owned variables being passed with RC 1). This
mostly improves the situation in the parser which previously had many
functions that were supposed to be linear in terms of `ParserState` but
the compiler made them non-linear. For an example of how this affected
parsers:
```lean-4
def optionalFn (p : ParserFn) : ParserFn := fun c s =>
let iniSz := s.stackSize
let iniPos := s.pos
let s := p c s
let s := if s.hasError && s.pos == iniPos then s.restore iniSz iniPos else s
s.mkNode nullKind iniSz
```
previously moved the `let iniSz := ...` declaration into the `hasError`
branch. However, this means that at the point of calling the inner
parser (`p c s`), the original state `s` needs to have RC>1 because it
is used later in the `hasError` branch, breaking linearity. This fix
prevents such moves, keeping `iniSz` before the `p c s` call.
This PR implements support for user-defined attributes at
`grind_pattern`. Suppose we have declared the `grind` attribute
```lean
register_grind_attr my_grind
```
Then, we can now write
```lean
opaque f : Nat → Nat
opaque g : Nat → Nat
axiom fg : g (f x) = x
grind_pattern [my_grind] fg => g (f x)
```
This PR implements user-defined `grind` attributes. They are useful for
users that want to implement tactics using the `grind` infrastructure
(e.g., `progress*` in Aeneas). New `grind` attributes are declared using
the command
```lean
register_grind_attr my_grind
```
The command is similar to `register_simp_attr`. After the new attribute
is declared. Recall that similar to `register_simp_attr`, the new
attribute cannot be used in the same file it is declared.
```lean
opaque f : Nat → Nat
opaque g : Nat → Nat
@[my_grind] theorem fax : f (f x) = f x := sorry
example theorem fax2 : f (f (f x)) = f x := by
fail_if_success grind
grind [my_grind]
```
TODO: remove leftovers after update stage0
This PR adds more MPL spec lemmas for all combinations of `for` loops,
`fold(M)` and the `filter(M)/filterMap(M)/map(M)` iterator combinators.
These kinds of loops over these combinators (e.g. `it.mapM`) are first
transformed into loops over their base iterators (`it`), and if the base
iterator is of type `Iter _` or `IterM Id _`, then another spec lemma
exists for proving Hoare triples about it using an invariant and the
underlying list (`it.toList`). The PR also fixes a bug that MPL always
assigns the default priority to spec lemmas if `Std.Tactic.Do.Syntax` is
not imported and a bug that low-priority lemmas are preferred about
high-priority ones.
For context, the MPL bug was related to the fact that the `Attr.spec`
syntax is not built-in. Therefore, Lean falls back to the `Attr.simple`
syntax, which *basically* also works, but which stores the priority at a
different position. The routine to extract the priority does not
consider this and so it falls back to the default priority given an
`Attr.simple` syntax object.
This PR enables the specializer to also recursively specialize in some
non trivial higher order situations.
The main motivation for this change is the upcoming changes to do
notation by sgraf. In there he uses combinators such as
```lean
@[specialize, expose]
def List.newForIn {α β γ} (l : List α) (b : β) (kcons : α → (β → γ) → β → γ) (knil : β → γ) : γ :=
match l with
| [] => knil b
| a :: l => kcons a (l.newForIn · kcons knil) b
```
in programs such as
```lean
def testing :=
let x := 42;
List.newForIn (β := Nat) (γ := Id Nat)
[1,2,3]
x
(fun i kcontinue s =>
let x := s;
List.newForIn
[i:10].toList x
(fun j kcontinue s =>
let x := s;
let x := x + i + j;
kcontinue x)
kcontinue)
pure
```
inspecting this IR right before we get to the specializer in the current
compiler we get:
```
[Compiler.eagerLambdaLifting] size: 22
def testing : Nat :=
fun _f.1 _y.2 : Nat :=
return _y.2;
let x := 42;
let _x.3 := 1;
fun _f.4 i kcontinue s : Nat :=
fun _f.5 j kcontinue s : Nat :=
let _x.6 := Nat.add s i;
let x := Nat.add _x.6 j;
let _x.7 := kcontinue x;
return _x.7;
let _x.8 := 10;
let _x.9 := Nat.sub _x.8 i;
let _x.10 := Nat.add _x.9 _x.3;
let _x.11 := 1;
let _x.12 := Nat.sub _x.10 _x.11;
let _x.13 := Nat.mul _x.3 _x.12;
let _x.14 := Nat.add i _x.13;
let _x.15 := @List.nil _;
let _x.16 := List.range'TR.go _x.3 _x.12 _x.14 _x.15;
let _x.17 := @List.newForIn _ _ _ _x.16 s _f.5 kcontinue;
return _x.17;
let _x.18 := 2;
let _x.19 := 3;
let _x.20 := @List.nil _;
let _x.21 := @List.cons _ _x.19 _x.20;
let _x.22 := @List.cons _ _x.18 _x.21;
let _x.23 := @List.cons _ _x.3 _x.22;
let _x.24 := @List.newForIn _ _ _ _x.23 x _f.4 _f.1;
return _x.24
```
Here the `kcontinue` higher order functions pose a special challenge
because they delay the discovery of new specialization opportunities.
Inspecting the IR after the current specializer (and a cleanup simp
step) we get functions that look as follows:
```
[simp] size: 7
def List.newForIn._at_.testing.spec_0 i kcontinue l b : Nat :=
cases l : Nat
| List.nil =>
let _x.1 := kcontinue b;
return _x.1
| List.cons head.2 tail.3 =>
let _x.4 := Nat.add b i;
let x := Nat.add _x.4 head.2;
let _x.5 := List.newForIn._at_.testing.spec_0 i kcontinue tail.3 x;
return _x.5
[simp] size: 14
def List.newForIn._at_.List.newForIn._at_.testing.spec_1.spec_1 _x.1 l b : Nat :=
cases l : Nat
| List.nil =>
return b
| List.cons head.2 tail.3 =>
fun _f.4 x.5 : Nat :=
let _x.6 := List.newForIn._at_.List.newForIn._at_.testing.spec_1.spec_1 _x.1 tail.3 x.5;
return _x.6;
let _x.7 := 10;
let _x.8 := Nat.sub _x.7 head.2;
let _x.9 := Nat.add _x.8 _x.1;
let _x.10 := 1;
let _x.11 := Nat.sub _x.9 _x.10;
let _x.12 := Nat.mul _x.1 _x.11;
let _x.13 := Nat.add head.2 _x.12;
let _x.14 := @List.nil _;
let _x.15 := List.range'TR.go _x.1 _x.11 _x.13 _x.14;
let _x.16 := List.newForIn._at_.testing.spec_0 head.2 _f.4 _x.15 b;
return _x.16
```
Observe that the specializer decided to abstract over `kcontinue`
instead of specializing further recursively. Thus this tight loop is now
going through an indirect call.
This PR now changes the specializer somewhat fundamentally to handle
situations like this. The most notable change is going to a fixpoint
loop of:
1. Specialize all current declarations in the worklist
2. If a declaration
- succeeded in specializing run the simplifier on it and put it back
onto the worklist
- if it didn't don't put it back onto the worklist anymore
3. Put all newly generated specialisations on the worklist
4. Recompute fixed parameters for the current SCC
5. Repeat until the worklist is empty
Furthermore, declarations that were already specialized:
- only consider `fixedHO` parameters for specialization, in order to
avoid termination issues with repeated specialization and abstraction of
type class parameters under binders
- recursively specialized declarations only allow specialization if at
least one of their fixedHO arguments is not a parameter itself. The
reason for allowing this in first generation specialization is that we
refrain from specializing inside the body of a declaration marked as
`@[specialize]`. Thus we need to specialize them even if their arguments
don't actually contain anything of interest in order to ensure that type
classes etc. are correctly cleaned up within their bodies.
There is one last trade-off to consider. When specializing code
generated by the new do elaborator we sometimes generate intermediate
specializations that are not actually part of any call graph after we
are done specializing. We could in principle detect these functions and
delete them but having them in cache is potentially helpful for further
specializations later. Once the new do elaborator lands we plan to test
this trade-off.
Closes#10924
This PR fixes a SIGFPE crash on x86_64 when evaluating `INT_MIN / -1` or
`INT_MIN % -1` for signed integer types.
On x86_64, the `idiv` instruction traps when the quotient overflows the
destination register. For signed integers, `INT_MIN / -1` produces a
result that overflows (e.g., `-2147483648 / -1 = 2147483648` which
doesn't fit in Int32). ARM64's `sdiv` instruction wraps instead of
trapping.
The fix:
- For Int8/Int16/Int32: widen to the next larger type before
dividing/modding, then truncate back
- For Int64: explicitly check for the overflow case and return the
wrapped result
Fixes#11612🤖 Prepared with Claude Code
This PR implements a linter that warns when a deprecated coercion is
applied. It also warns when the `Option` coercion or the
`Subarray`-to-`Array` coercion is used in `Init` or `Std`. The linter is
currently limited to `Coe` instances; `CoeFun` instances etc. are not
considered.
The linter works by collecting the `Coe` instance declaration names that
are being expanded in `expandCoe?` and storing them in the info tree.
The linter itself then analyzes the info tree and checks for banned or
deprecated coercions.
This PR improves indexing for `grind` patterns. We now include symbols
occurring in nested ground patterns. This important to minimize the
number of activated E-match theorems.
