This PR prevents `exact?` and `apply?` from suggesting tactics that
correspond to correct proofs but do not elaborate, and it allows these
tactics to suggest `expose_names` when needed.
These tactics now indicate that a non-compiling term was generated but
do not suggest that that term be inserted. `exact?` also no longer
suggests that the user try `apply?` if no partial suggestions were
found.
This addresses part of #5407 but does not achieve the exact expected
behavior therein (due to #6122).
This PR avoids runtime array bounds checks in places where it can
trivially be done at compile time.
None of these changes are of particular consequence: I mostly wanted to
learn how much we do this, and what the obstacles are to doing it less.
Gives more control over pretty printing metavariables.
- When `pp.mvars.levels` is false, then universe level metavariables
pretty print as `_` rather than `?u.22`
- When `pp.mvars.anonymous` is false, then anonymous metavariables
pretty print as `?_` rather than `?m.22`. Named metavariables still
pretty print with their names. When this is false, it also sets
`pp.mvars.levels` to false, since every level metavariable is anonymous.
- When `pp.mvars` is false, then all metavariables pretty print as `?_`
or `_`.
Modifies TryThis to use `pp.mvars.anonymous` rather than doing a
post-delaboration modification. This incidentally improves TryThis since
it now prints universe level metavariables as `_` rather than `?u.22`.
* Replaces the unused `Lean.PrettyPrinter.ppConst` with
`MessageData.ofConst` (which similarly avoids an unnecessary `@`) and
that further generates a hover for the constant
* Uses this in `TryThis.addRewriteSuggestion`, so that `rw?` suggestions
don't have unnecessary `@`s.
* Add `MessageData.signature`, as a wrapper around
`PrettyPrinter.signature`, using the same machinery to generate hovers
for constants, improving the hover behaviour in #check so that we get
second order pop-up for constants in the signature. (Not sure how to
write tests for second order hovers, so there is no test for this.)
