This PR adds the `try?` tactic. This is the first draft, but it can
already solve examples such as:
```lean
example (e : Expr) : e.simplify.eval σ = e.eval σ := by
try?
```
in `grind_constProp.lean`. In the example above, it suggests:
```lean
induction e using Expr.simplify.induct <;> grind?
```
In the same test file, we have
```lean
example (σ₁ σ₂ : State) : σ₁.join σ₂ ≼ σ₂ := by
try?
```
and the following suggestion is produced
```lean
induction σ₁, σ₂ using State.join.induct <;> grind?
```
This updates the rw? tactic from Mathlib to use lazy discriminator trees
and upstreams it.
---------
Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <scott.morrison@gmail.com>
This replaces a few uses of initialize with builtin_initialize, and
removes some unneeded functionality added when it was unclear if lazy
discriminator trees would be efficient enough.
This fixes an issue discovered in Mathlib with the meta cache being
poisoned by using a name generator. It is difficult to reproduce due to
the name collisions being rare, but here is a minimal module with
definitions that result in an error:
```lean
prelude
universe u
inductive Unit2 : Type where
| unit : Unit2
inductive Eq2 {α : Sort u} : α → α → Prop where
| refl (a : α) : Eq2 a a
structure Subtype2 {α : Sort u} (p : α → Prop) where
val : α
def End (α) := α → α
theorem end_app_eq (α : Type u) (f : End α) (a : α) : Eq2 (f a) (f a) := Eq2.refl _
theorem Set.coe_eq_subtype {α : Type u} (s : α → Prop) : Eq2 (Subtype2 s) (Subtype2 s) := Eq2.refl _
def succAboveCases {_ : Unit2} {α : Unit2 → Sort u} (i : Unit2) (v : α i) : α i := v
theorem succAbove_cases_eq_insertNth : Eq2 @succAboveCases.{u + 1} @succAboveCases.{u + 1} := Eq2.refl _
```
Removing any of thee last 5 definitions avoids the error. Testing
against Mathlib shows this PR fixes the issue.
This is still a draft PR, but includes the core exact? and apply?
tactics.
Still need to convert to builtin syntax and test on Std.
---------
Co-authored-by: David Thrane Christiansen <david@davidchristiansen.dk>
