This PR addresses some non-critical but annoying issues that sometimes
cause the language server to report an error:
- When using global search and replace in VS Code, the language client
sends `textDocument/didChange` notifications for documents that it never
told the server to open first. Instead of emitting an error and crashing
the language server when this occurs, we now instead ignore the
notification. Fixes#4435.
- When terminating the language server, VS Code sometimes still sends
request to the language server even after emitting a `shutdown` request.
The LSP spec explicitly forbids this, but instead of emitting an error
when this occurs, we now error requests and ignore all other messages
until receiving the final `exit` notification. Reported on Zulip several
times over the years but never materialized as an issue, e.g.
https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/270676-lean4/topic/Got.20.60shutdown.60.20request.2C.20expected.20an.20.60exit.60.20notification/near/441914289.
- Some language clients attempt to reply to the file watcher
registration request before completing the LSP initialization dance. To
fix this, we now only send this request after the initialization dance
has completed. Fixes#3904.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Ullrich <sebasti@nullri.ch>
A pending tactic mvar managed to escape into an unexpected context in
specific circumstances.
```lean
example : True := by
· rw [show 0 = 0 by rfl]
```
* Term elaboration of the `show` creates a pending mvar for the `by rfl`
proof
* `rw` fails with an exception because the pattern does not occur in the
target
* `cdot` catches the exception and admits the goal
* `Term.runTactic` [synthesizes all pending mvars from the tactic's
execution](5f9dedfe5e/src/Lean/Elab/SyntheticMVars.lean (L350)),
including the `by rfl` proof. But this would not have happened without
`cdot` as the exception would have skipped that invocation!
* Now incrementality is confused because the nested `by rfl` proof is
unexpectedly run in the same context as the top-level proof, writing to
the wrong promise, and the error message is lost
Solution: disable incrementality for these pending mvars
The performance issue at #4413 is due to our `Fin.sub` definition.
```
def sub : Fin n → Fin n → Fin n
| ⟨a, h⟩, ⟨b, _⟩ => ⟨(a + (n - b)) % n, mlt h⟩
```
Thus, the following runs out of stack space
```
example (a : UInt64) : a - 1 = a :=
rfl
```
at the `isDefEq` test
```
(a.val.val + 18446744073709551615) % 18446744073709551616 =?= a.val.val
```
From the user's perspective, this timeout is unexpected since they are
using small numerals, and none of the other `Fin` basic operations (such
as `Fin.add` and `Fin.mul`) suffer from this problem.
This PR implements an inelegant solution for the performance issue. It
redefines `Fin.sub` as
```
def sub : Fin n → Fin n → Fin n
| ⟨a, h⟩, ⟨b, _⟩ => ⟨((n - b) + a) % n, mlt h⟩
```
This approach is unattractive because it relies on the fact that
`Nat.add` is defined using recursion on the second argument.
The impact on this repo was small, but we want to evaluate the impact on
Mathlib.
closes#4413
Before this commit, the `theorem` and `def` declarations had different
universe parameter orders.
For example, the following `theorem`:
```
theorem f (a : α) (f : α → β) : f a = f a := by
rfl
```
was elaborated as
```
theorem f.{u_2, u_1} : ∀ {α : Sort u_1} {β : Sort u_2} (a : α) (f : α → β), f a = f a :=
fun {α} {β} a f => Eq.refl (f a)
```
However, if we declare `f` as a `def`, the expected order is produced.
```
def f.{u_1, u_2} : ∀ {α : Sort u_1} {β : Sort u_2} (a : α) (f : α → β), f a = f a :=
fun {α} {β} a f => Eq.refl (f a)
```
This commit fixes this discrepancy.
@semorrison @jcommelin: This might be a disruptive change to Mathlib,
but it is better to fix the issue asap. I am surprised nobody has
complained about this issue before. I discovered it while trying to
reduce discrepancies between `theorem` and `def` elaboration.
Closes#4375
The following example raises `error: (kernel) declaration has free
variables '_example'`:
```lean
example: Nat → Nat :=
let a : Nat := Nat.zero
fun (_ : Nat) =>
let b : Nat := Nat.zero
(fun (_ : a = b) => 0) (Eq.refl a)
```
During elaboration of `0`, `elabNumLit` creates a synthetic mvar
`?_uniq.16` which gets abstracted by `elabFun` to `?_uniq.16 :=
?_uniq.50 _uniq.6 _uniq.12`. The `isDefEq` to `instOfNatNat 0` results
in:
```
?_uniq.50 :=
fun (x._@.4375._hyg.13 : Nat) =>
let b : Nat := Nat.zero
fun (x._@.4375._hyg.23 : Eq.{1} Nat _uniq.4 b) =>
instOfNatNat 0
```
This has a free variable `_uniq.4` which was `a`.
When the application of `?_uniq.50` to `#[#2, #0]` is instantiated, the
`let b : Nat := Nat.zero` blocks the beta-reduction and `_uniq.4`
remains in the expression.
fix: add `(useZeta := true)` here:
ea46bf2839/src/Lean/MetavarContext.lean (L567)
As [reported on
Zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113488-general/topic/maybe.20a.20cache.20bug.3F).
We expected that for sound reuse of elaboration results, it is
sufficient to compare the old and new syntax tree's structure and atoms
including position info, but not the whitespace in between them.
However, we have at least one request handler, the goal view, that
inspects the whitespace after a tactic and thus could return incorrect
results on reuse. For now we implement the straightforward fix of
checking the whitespace as well. Alternatives like updating the
whitespace stored in the reused info tree are tbd.
This has the slight disadvantage that adding whitespace at the end of a
tactic will re-execute it (or the entire body, but not the header, if
the body is not a tactic block), but only up to typing the first
character of the next tactic or command.
so that the pretty-printed origin is clickable, and avoid the
unnecessary `@`.
Particularly nice is this fix:
```diff
/--
-info: [Meta.Tactic.simp.discharge] @bar discharge ✅
+info: [Meta.Tactic.simp.discharge] bar discharge ✅
autoParam T _auto✝
- [Meta.Tactic.simp.rewrite] { }:1000, T ==> True
-[Meta.Tactic.simp.rewrite] @bar:1000, U ==> True
+ [Meta.Tactic.simp.rewrite] T.mk:1000, T ==> True
+[Meta.Tactic.simp.rewrite] bar:1000, U ==> True
-/
```
this is an amendment to #4177, after @kmill pointed out an issue:
Users might expect that within a tactic combinator like `first`, `simp
[h]` fails if `h` does not exist. Therefore the behavior introduced in
PR #4177, which is really most useful in mormal interactive use of
`skip`, is restricted to when `recover := true`.
types like
```
inductive Many (α : Type u) where
| none : Many α
| more : α → (Unit → Many α) → Many α
```
have a `.brecOn` only supports motives producing `Type u`, but not `Sort
u`, but our induction principles produce `Prop`. So the previous
implementation of functional induction would fail for functions that
structurally recurse over such types.
We recognize this case now and, rather hazardously, replace `.brecOn`
with `.binductionOn` (and thus `.below ` with `.ibelow` and `PProd` with
`And`). This assumes that these definitions are highly analogous.
This also improves the error message when realizing a reserved name
fails with an exception, by prepending
```
Failed to realize constant {id}:
```
to the error message.
Fixes#4320
Remark: when splitting an `if-then-else` term, the subgoals now have
tags `isTrue` and `isFalse` instead of `inl` and `inr`.
closes#4313
---------
Co-authored-by: Mario Carneiro <di.gama@gmail.com>
The `save` happened in a slightly different context from the restore,
which a refinement of the `saveOrRestoreFull` signature now makes
impossible.
Fixes#4328
this fixes a usability paper cut that just annoyed me. When editing a
larger simp proof, I usually want to see the goal state after the simp,
and this is what I see while the `simp` command is complete. But then,
when I start typing, and necessarily type incomplete lemma names, that
error makes `simp` do nothing again and I see the original goal state.
In fact, if a prefix of the simp theorem name I am typing is a valid
identifier, it jumps even more around.
With this PR, using `logException`, I still get the red squiggly lines
for the unknown identifer, but `simp` just ignores that argument and
still shows me the final goal. Much nicer.
I also demoted the message for `[-foo]` when `foo` isn’t `simp` to a
warning and gave it the correct `ref`.
See it in action here: (in the middle, when you suddenly see the
terminal,
I am switching lean versions.)
https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/assets/148037/8cb3c563-1354-4c2d-bcee-26dfa1005ae0
Without this, it would not easy but perhaps be feasible to break
incrementality when editing command prefixes such as `set_option ... in
theorem` or also `theorem namesp.name ...` (which is a macro),
especially if at some later point we support incrementality in input
shifted by an edit. Explicit, sound support for these common cases will
be brought back soon.
Extends Lean's incremental reporting and reuse between commands into
various steps inside declarations:
* headers and bodies of each (mutual) definition/theorem
* `theorem ... := by` for each contained tactic step, including
recursively inside supported combinators currently consisting of
* `·` (cdot), `case`, `next`
* `induction`, `cases`
* macros such as `next` unfolding to the above
*Incremental reuse* means not recomputing any such steps if they are not
affected by a document change. *Incremental reporting* includes the
parts seen in the recording above: the progress bar and messages. Other
language server features such as hover etc. are *not yet* supported
incrementally, i.e. they are shown only when the declaration has been
fully processed as before.
---------
Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <scott.morrison@gmail.com>
this fixes#4078. It is an alternative fix to the one in #4137,
suggested
by @kmill.
Incidentially, it makes the unused variable linter better. My theory is
that
if we don’t reset the info when backtracking, the binder shows up more
than
once in the info tree, and then it is considered “used”, although there
are
just multiple binders.
Add docstrings, usage examples, and doc tests for `String.prev`,
`.front`, `.back`, `.atEnd`.
Improve docstring examples for `String.next` based on discussion
examples for `String.prev`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Kim Morrison <kim@tqft.net>
To eliminate parsing differences between Windows and other platforms,
the frontend now normalizes all CRLF line endings to LF, like [in
Rust](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/62865).
Effects:
- This makes Lake hashes be faithful to what Lean sees (Lake already
normalizes line endings before computing hashes).
- Docstrings now have normalized line endings. In particular, this fixes
`#guard_msgs` failing multiline tests for Windows users using CRLF.
- Now strings don't have different lengths depending on the platform.
Before this PR, the following theorem is true for LF and false for CRLF
files.
```lean
example : "
".length = 1 := rfl
```
Note: the normalization will take `\r\r\n` and turn it into `\r\n`. In
the elaborator, we reject loose `\r`'s that appear in whitespace. Rust
instead takes the approach of making the normalization routine fail.
They do this so that there's no downstream confusion about any `\r\n`
that appears.
Implementation note: the LSP maintains its own copy of a source file
that it updates when edit operations are applied. We are assuming that
edit operations never split or join CRLFs. If this assumption is not
correct, then the LSP copy of a source file can become slightly out of
sync. If this is an issue, there is some discussion
[here](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3903#discussion_r1592930085).
Given `h` with type `x + k = y + k'` (or `h : k = k')`, `cases h`
produced a proof of size linear in `min k k'`. `isDefEq` has support for
offset, but `unifyEq?` did not have it, and a stack overflow occurred
while processing the resulting proof. This PR fixes this issue.
closes#4219
