Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Kyle Miller
02c8c2f9e1
feat: use nondep flag in Expr.letE and LocalContext.ldecl (#8804)
This PR implements first-class support for nondependent let expressions
in the elaborator; recall that a let expression `let x : t := v; b` is
called *nondependent* if `fun x : t => b` typechecks, and the notation
for a nondependent let expression is `have x := v; b`. Previously we
encoded `have` using the `letFun` function, but now we make use of the
`nondep` flag in the `Expr.letE` constructor for the encoding. This has
been given full support throughout the metaprogramming interface and the
elaborator. Key changes to the metaprogramming interface:
- Local context `ldecl`s with `nondep := true` are generally treated as
`cdecl`s. This is because in the body of a `have` expression the
variable is opaque. Functions like `LocalDecl.isLet` by default return
`false` for nondependent `ldecl`s. In the rare case where it is needed,
they take an additional optional `allowNondep : Bool` flag (defaults to
`false`) if the variable is being processed in a context where the value
is relevant.
- Functions such as `mkLetFVars` by default generalize nondependent let
variables and create lambda expressions for them. The
`generalizeNondepLet` flag (default true) can be set to false if `have`
expressions should be produced instead. **Breaking change:** Uses of
`letLambdaTelescope`/`mkLetFVars` need to use `generalizeNondepLet :=
false`. See the next item.
- There are now some mapping functions to make telescoping operations
more convenient. See `mapLetTelescope` and `mapLambdaLetTelescope`.
There is also `mapLetDecl` as a counterpart to `withLetDecl` for
creating `let`/`have` expressions.
- Important note about the `generalizeNondepLet` flag: it should only be
used for variables in a local context that the metaprogram "owns". Since
nondependent let variables are treated as constants in most cases, the
`value` field might refer to variables that do not exist, if for example
those variables were cleared or reverted. Using `mapLetDecl` is always
fine.
- The simplifier will cache its let dependence calculations in the
nondep field of let expressions.
- The `intro` tactic still produces *dependent* local variables. Given
that the simplifier will transform lets into haves, it would be
surprising if that would prevent `intro` from creating a local variable
whose value cannot be used.

Note that nondependence of lets is not checked by the kernel. To
external checker authors: If the elaborator gets the nondep flag wrong,
we consider this to be an elaborator error. Feel free to typecheck `letE
n t v b true` as if it were `app (lam n t b default) v` and please
report issues.

This PR follows up from #8751, which made sure the nondep flag was
preserved in the C++ interface.
2025-06-22 21:54:57 +00:00
Kyle Miller
6240cd5aa9
feat: make sure clear_value preserves local context order (#8792)
This PR makes the `clear_value` tactic preserve the order of variables
in the local context. This is done by adding
`Lean.MVarId.withRevertedFrom`, which reverts all local variables
starting from a given variable, rather than only the ones that depend on
it.

Note: an alternative implementation might convert the ldecl to a cdecl
and then reset the meta cache. This assumes that there are no other
caches that might still remember the value of the ldecl.
2025-06-18 04:40:20 +00:00
euprunin
52e0742108
chore: fix spelling mistakes (#8711)
Co-authored-by: euprunin <euprunin@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-06-10 20:24:28 +00:00
Kyle Miller
4dd8648a25
feat: different syntax for new clear_value tactic (#8516)
This PR is a followup to #8449 to refine the syntax of `clear_value`.
The syntax for adding equality hypotheses before clearing values is now
`clear_value (h : x = _)`. Any expression definitionally equal to `x`
can be used in place of the underscore.

This syntax was developed in a [Zulip
discussion](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/270676-lean4/topic/.60clear_value.60.20syntax.20request.20for.20comments/near/520704290).
2025-05-28 22:33:35 +00:00
Kyle Miller
a6dd6a4656
feat: clear_value tactic (#8449)
This PR upstreams and extends the Mathlib `clear_value` tactic. Given a
local definition `x : T := v`, the tactic `clear_value x` replaces it
with a hypothesis `x : T`, or throws an error if the goal does not
depend on the value `v`. The syntax `clear_value x with h` creates a
hypothesis `h : x = v` before clearing the value of `x`. Furthermore,
`clear_value *` clears all values that can be cleared, or throws an
error if none can be cleared.
2025-05-27 01:52:08 +00:00