As per dicussion with team colleages, the feature shouldn’t be called
“auto attach” but rather “well-founded recursion preprocessing” to avoid
(imprecise) jargon.
This PR adds support for changing the binder annotations of existing
variables to and from strict-implicit and instance-implicit using the
`variable` command.
This PR requires a stage0 update to fully take effect.
Closes#6078
This PR splits the environment used by the kernel from that used by the
elaborator, providing the foundation for tracking of asynchronously
elaborated declarations, which will exist as a concept only in the
latter.
Minor changes:
* kernel diagnostics are moved from an environment extension to a direct
environment as they are the only extension used directly by the kernel
* `initQuot` is moved from an environment header field to a direct
environment as it is the only header field used by the kernel; this also
makes the remaining header immutable after import
This PR modifies structure instance notation and `where` notation to use
the same notation for fields. Structure instance notation now admits
binders, type ascriptions, and equations, and `where` notation admits
full structure lvals. Examples of these for structure instance notation:
```lean
structure PosFun where
f : Nat → Nat
pos : ∀ n, 0 < f n
def p : PosFun :=
{ f n := n + 1
pos := by simp }
def p' : PosFun :=
{ f | 0 => 1
| n + 1 => n + 1
pos := by rintro (_|_) <;> simp }
```
Just like for the structure `where` notation, a field `f x y z : ty :=
val` expands to `f := fun x y z => (val : ty)`. The type ascription is
optional.
The PR also is setting things up for future expansion. Pending some
discussion, in the future structure/`where` notation could have have
embedded `where` clauses; rather than `{ a := { x := 1, y := z } }` one
could write `{ a where x := 1; y := z }`.
Following up #5928, updates the syntax for `omega` and `solve_by_elim`
and restores the syntax quotations in their implementations.
Following up #5898, uses the new tactic syntax in the library, replacing
all uses of `(config := ...)`.
As far as I can tell, the ability to pass a structure instance to a
deriving handler is not actually used in practice. It didn't seem to be
used in the test suite, at least.
Do we want to remove this, or do we want to use and document it? This PR
removes it, but that's not something I feel strongly about - but seeing
if it breaks Mathlib is a useful data point.
PR #5883 added a new syntax for tactic configuration, and this PR
enables it in most tactics. Example: `simp +contextual`.
There will be followup PRs to modify the remaining ones.
Breaking change: Tactics that are macros for `simp` or other core
tactics need to adapt. The easiest way is to replace `(config)?` with
`optConfig` and then in the syntax quotations replace `$[$cfg]?` by
`$cfg:optConfig`. For tactics that manipulate the configuration, see
`erw` for an example:
```lean
macro "erw" c:optConfig s:rwRuleSeq loc:(location)? : tactic => do
`(tactic| rw $[$(getConfigItems c)]* (transparency := .default) $s:rwRuleSeq $(loc)?)
```
Configuration options are processed left-to-right, so this forces the
`transparency` to always be `.default`.
This adds the ability to add the converse direction of a rewrite rule
not just in simp arguments `simp [← thm]`, but also as a global
attribute
```lean
attribute [simp ←] thm
```
This fixes#5828.
This can be undone with `attribute [-simp]`, although note that
`[-simp]` wins and cannot be undone at the moment (#5868).
Like `simp [← thm]` (see #4290), this will do an implicit `attribute
[-simp] thm` if the other direction is already defined.
