This PR adds further `@[grind]` annotations for `Option`, as follow-up
to the recent additions to the `Option` API in #8379 and #8298.
**However**, I am concurrently investigating adding `attribute [grind
cases] Option`, which will result in many (most?) of the annotations for
`Option` being removed again. In any case, I'm going to merge this
first, as if that is viable I would like to test that most/all the
lemmas now marked with `@[grind]` are still provable by `grind`.
This PR adds a verification of `Array.qsort` properties, trying to use
`grind` and `fun_induction` where possible.
Currently this is in the `tests/` folder, but once `grind` is ready for
production use we will move it out into the library.
Note that the current `qsort` algorithm has quadratic behaviour on
constant lists, and needs to be adjusted. We'll only move the
verification out into the library once this has been fixed (and the
proofs adapted). These verification theorems may be commented out in the
meantime if it's urgent to fix `qsort`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Kyle Miller <kmill31415@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de>
This PR implements non-chronological backtracking for the `grind`
tactic. This feature ensures that `grind` does not need to process
irrelevant branches after performing a case-split that is not relevant.
It is not just about performance, but also the size of the final proof
term. The new test demonstrates this feature in practice.
```lean
-- In the following test, the first 8 case-splits are irrelevant,
-- and non-choronological backtracking is used to avoid searching
-- (2^8 - 1) irrelevant branches
/--
trace:
[grind.split] p8 ∨ q8, generation: 0
[grind.split] p7 ∨ q7, generation: 0
[grind.split] p6 ∨ q6, generation: 0
[grind.split] p5 ∨ q5, generation: 0
[grind.split] p4 ∨ q4, generation: 0
[grind.split] p3 ∨ q3, generation: 0
[grind.split] p2 ∨ q2, generation: 0
[grind.split] p1 ∨ q1, generation: 0
[grind.split] ¬p ∨ ¬q, generation: 0
-/
#guard_msgs (trace) in
set_option trace.grind.split true in
theorem ex
: p ∨ q →
¬ p ∨ q →
p ∨ ¬ q →
¬ p ∨ ¬ q →
p1 ∨ q1 →
p2 ∨ q2 →
p3 ∨ q3 →
p4 ∨ q4 →
p5 ∨ q5 →
p6 ∨ q6 →
p7 ∨ q7 →
p8 ∨ q8 →
False := by
grind (splits := 10)
```
This PR fixes `split` in the presence of metavariables in the target.
The fix consists of replacing an internal use of `apply` for
instantiating match splitters by a new, simpler variant `applyN`. This
new `applyN` is not prone to #8436, which is the ultimate cause for
`split` failing on targets containing metavariables.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Graf <sg@lean-fro.org>
Co-authored-by: Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de>
This PR reworks the `simp` set around the `Id` monad, to not elide or
unfold `pure` and `Id.run`
In particular, it stops encoding the "defeq abuse" of `Id X = X` in the
statements of theorems, instead using `Id.run` and `pure` to pass back
and forth between these two spellings. Often when writing these with
`pure`, they generalize to other lawful monads; though such changes were
split off to other PRs.
This fixes the problem with the current simp set where `Id.run (pure x)`
is simplified to `Id.run x`, instead of the desirable `x`.
This is particularly bad because the` x` is sometimes inferred with type
`Id X` instead of `X`, which prevents other `simp` lemmas about `X` from
firing.
Making `Id` reducible instead is not an option, as then the `Monad`
instances would have nothing to key on.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Graf <sg@lean-fro.org>
Co-authored-by: Kim Morrison <kim@tqft.net>
Co-authored-by: Paul Reichert <6992158+datokrat@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR introduces a `noConfusionType` construction that’s sub-quadratic
in size, and reduces faster.
The previous `noConfusion` construction with two nested `match`
statements is quadratic in size and reduction behavior. Using some
helper definitions, a linear size construction is possible.
With this, processing the RISC-V-AST definition from
https://github.com/opencompl/sail-riscv-lean takes 6s instead of 60s.
The previous construction is still used when processing the early
prelude, and can be enabled elsewhere using `set_option
backwards.linearNoConfusionType false`.
This PR changes namespace completion to use the same algorithm as
declaration identifier completion, which makes it use the short name
(last name component) for completions instead of the full name, avoiding
namespace duplications.
Closes#5654
This PR fixes a bug where the unknown identifier code actions wouldn't
work correctly for some unknown identifier error spans and adjusts
several unknown identifier spans to actually end on the identifier in
question.
The following additional adjustments are made:
- The fallback mechanism of the unknown identifier code actions is
removed, since it could produce severely incorrect suggestions for
unknown identifier errors on fields.
- A performance bug when using the code action to import all unknown
identifiers is fixed.
- A bug that occurs when the elaborator produces multiple overlapping
completion infos is fixed.
- A bug in the snapshot selection that could cause it to wait for
snapshots in snapshots with non-canonical syntax is fixed.
- Some invariants of the snapshot tree are documented.
- The snapshot tree formatting is adjusted to display the final info
tree again.
This PR adds the attribute `[grind?]`. It is like `[grind]` but displays
inferred E-matching patterns. It is a more convinient than writing.
Thanks @kim-em for suggesting this feature.
```lean
set_option trace.grind.ematch.pattern true
```
This PR also improves some tests, and adds helper function
`ENode.isRoot`.
This PR introduces a very minimal version of the new iterator library.
It comes with list iterators and various consumers, namely `toArray`,
`toList`, `toListRev`, `ForIn`, `fold`, `foldM` and `drain`. All
consumers also come in a partial variant that can be used without any
proofs. This limited version of the iterator library generates decent
code, even with the old code generator.
This PR introduces `Lean.Grind.Field`, proves that a `IsCharP 0` field
satisfies `NoNatZeroDivisors`, and sets up some basic (currently
failing) tests for `grind`.
This PR adds variants of `HashMap.getElem?_filter` that assume
`LawfulBEq` and have a simpler right-hand-side. `simp` can already
achieve these, via rewriting with `getKey_eq` under the lambda. However
`grind` can not, and these lemmas help `grind` work with `HashMap`
goals. There are variants for all variants of `HashMap`,
`getElem?/getElem/getElem!/getD`, and for `filter` and `filterMap`.
This PR implements normalization rules that pull universal quantifiers
across disjunctions. This is a common normalization step performed by
first-order theorem provers.
This PR improves the error messages produced by invalid pattern-match
alternatives and improves parity in error placement between
pattern-matching tactics and elaborators.
Closes#7170
This PR improves the error messages displayed in `inductive`
declarations when type parameters are invalid or absent.
Closes#2195 by improving the relevant error message.
This PR unifies various ways of naming auxiliary declarations in a
conflict-free way and ensures the method is compatible with diverging
branches of elaboration such as parallelism or Aesop-like
backtracking+replaying search.
This PR ensures that using `mapError` to expand an error message uses
`addMessageContext` to include the current context, so that expressions
are rendered correctly. Also adds a `preprendError` variant with a more
convenient argument order for the common cases of
prepending-and-indenting.
This PR improves the functional cases principles, by making a more
educated guess which function parameters should be targets and which
should remain parameters (or be dropped). This simplifies the
principles, and increases the chance that `fun_cases` can unfold the
function call.
Fixes#8296 (at least for the common cases, I hope.)
This PR fixes a type error at `instantiateTheorem` function used in
`grind`. It was failing to instantiate theorems such as
```lean
theorem getElem_reverse {xs : Array α} {i : Nat} (hi : i < xs.reverse.size)
: (xs.reverse)[i] = xs[xs.size - 1 - i]'(by simp at hi; omega)
```
in examples such as
```lean
example (xs : Array Nat) (w : xs.reverse = xs) (j : Nat) (hj : 0 ≤ j) (hj' : j < xs.size / 2)
: xs[j] = xs[xs.size - 1 - j]
```
generating the issue
```lean
[issue] type error constructing proof for Array.getElem_reverse
when assigning metavariable ?hi with
‹j < xs.toList.length›
has type
j < xs.toList.length : Prop
but is expected to have type
j < xs.reverse.size : Prop
```
This PR fixes the transparency mode for ground patterns. This is
important for implicit instances. Here is a mwe for an issue detected
while testing `grind` in Mathlib.
```lean
example (a : Nat) : max a a = a := by
grind
instance : Max Nat where
max := Nat.max
example (a : Nat) : max a a = a := by
grind -- Should work
```
This PR adds basic support for eta-reduction to `grind`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Kim Morrison <kim@tqft.net>
Co-authored-by: Kim Morrison <scott.morrison@gmail.com>
This PR fixes a bug in the `cases` tacic introduced in #3188 that arises
when cases (not induction) is used with a non-atomic expression in using
and the argument indexing gets confused.
This fixes#8360.
This PR adjusts the experimental module system to not export the bodies
of `def`s unless opted out by the new attribute `@[expose]` on the `def`
or on a surrounding `section`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Markus Himmel <markus@lean-fro.org>
This PR splits `Lean.Grind.CommRing` into 4 typeclasses, for semirings
and noncommutative rings. This does not yet change the behaviour of
`grind`, which expects to find all 4 typeclasses. Later we will make
some generalizations.
This PR adds a `register_linter_set` command for declaring linter sets.
The `getLinterValue` function now checks if the present linter is
contained in a set that has been enabled (using the `set_option` command
or on the command line).
The implementation stores linter set membership in an environment
extension. As a consequence, we need to pass more data to
`getLinterValue`: the argument of ype `Options` has been replaced with a
`LinterOptions`, which you can access by writing `getLinterOptions`
instead of `getOptions`. (The alternative I considered is to modify the
`Options` structure. The current approach seems a bit higher-level and
lower-impact.)
The logic for checking whether a linter should be enabled now goes in
four steps:
1. If the linter has been explicitly en/disabled, return that.
2. If `linter.all` has been explicitly set, return that.
3. If the linter is in any set that has been enabled, return true.
4. Return the default setting for the linter.
Reasoning:
* The linter's explicit setting should take precedence.
* We want to be able to disable all but the explicitly enabled linters
with `linter.all`, so it should take precedence over linter sets.
* We want to progressively enable more linters as they become available,
so the check over sets should be *any*.
* Falling back to the default value last, ensures compatibility with the
current way we define linters.
The public-facing API currently does not allow modifying sets: all
linters have to be added when the set is declared. This way, there is
one place where all the contents of the set are listed.
Linter sets can be declared to contain linters that have not been
declared (yet): this allows declaring linter sets low down in the import
hierarchy when not all the requested linters are defined yet.
---------
Co-authored-by: grunweg <rothgami@math.hu-berlin.de>
This PR stops `dsimp` from visiting proof terms, which should make
`simp` and `dsimp` more efficient.
In this attempt I have `dsimp` leave the proofs in place as-is, instead
of simplifying the proof type.
Closes#6960
This PR refines the new wording of the "application type mismatch" error
message to avoid ambiguity in references to the "final" argument in a
subexpression that may be followed by additional arguments.
It does so by replacing "final" with "last," rephrasing the message so
that this adjective modifies the argument itself rather than the word
"argument," and only displaying this wording when two arguments could be
confused (determined by expression equality).
These changes were motivated by a report that in cases where a function
application `f a b c` fails to elaborate because `b` is incorrectly
typed, the existing error message's reference to `b` being the "final"
argument in the application `f a b` may create confusion because it is
not the final argument in the full application expression.
