This PR adds the `@[expose]` attribute to many functions (and changes
some theorems to be by `:= (rfl)`) in preparation for the `@[defeq]`
attribute change in #8419.
This PR adjusts the experimental module system to not export the bodies
of `def`s unless opted out by the new attribute `@[expose]` on the `def`
or on a surrounding `section`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Markus Himmel <markus@lean-fro.org>
This PR adds an initial set of `@[grind]` annotations for
`List`/`Array`/`Vector`, enough to set up some regression tests using
`grind` in proofs about `List`. More annotations to follow.
This PR adds `BitVec.[toInt_append|toFin_append]`.
`toInt_append` states:
```lean
(x ++ y).toInt = if n == 0 then y.toInt else (2 ^ m) * x.toInt + y.toNat
```
We also add the following `Nat` theorem (derived from a corresponding
theorem `two_pow_add_eq_or_of_lt`) as it faciliates the `append` proofs:
```lean
theorem shiftLeft_add_eq_or_of_lt {b : Nat} (b_lt : b < 2^i) (a : Nat) :
a <<< i + b = a <<< i ||| b
```
This PR adds `BitVec.[toNat|toFin|toInt]_[sshiftRight|sshiftRight']`
plus variants with `of_msb_*`. While at it, we also add
`toInt_zero_length` and `toInt_of_zero_length`. In support of our main
theorem we add `toInt_shiftRight_lt` and `le_toInt_shiftRight`, which
make the main theorem automatically derivable via omega.
We also add four shift lemmas for `Int`: `le_shiftRight_of_nonpos`,
`shiftRight_le_of_nonneg`, `le_shiftRight_of_nonneg`,
`shiftRight_le_of_nonpos`, as well as `emod_eq_add_self_emod`,
`ediv_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_neg `, and`bmod_eq_emod_of_lt `. For `Nat` we
add `shiftRight_le`.
Beyond the lemmas directly needed in the proof, we added a couple more
to ensure the API is complete.
We also fix the casing of `toFin_ushiftRight` and rename `lt_toInt` to
`two_mul_lt_toInt` to avoid `'`-ed lemmas.
This PR adds theorems `Nat.[shiftLeft_or_distrib`,
shiftLeft_xor_distrib`, shiftLeft_and_distrib`, `testBit_mul_two_pow`,
`bitwise_mul_two_pow`, `shiftLeft_bitwise_distrib]`, to prove
`Nat.shiftLeft_or_distrib` by emulating the proof strategy of
`shiftRight_and_distrib`.
In particular, `Nat.shiftLeft_or_distrib` is necessary to simplify the
proofs in #6476.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Keizer <alex@keizer.dev>
This PR adds lemmas reducing for loops over `Std.Range` to for loops
over `List.range'`.
Equivalent theorems previously existed in Batteries, but the underlying
definitions have changed so these are written from scratch.
This PR adds `Nat` theorems for distributing `>>>` over bitwise
operations, paralleling those of `BitVec`.
This enables closing goals like the following using `simp`:
```lean
example (n : Nat) : (n <<< 2 ||| 3) >>> 2 = n := by simp [Nat.shiftRight_or_distrib]
```
It might be nice for these theorems to be `simp` lemmas, but they are
not currently in order to be consistent with the existing `BitVec` and
`div_two` theorems.
This PR adds theorems characterizing the value of the unsigned shift
right of a bitvector in terms of its 2s complement interpretation as an
integer.
Unsigned shift right by at least one bit makes the value of the
bitvector less than or equal to `2^(w-1)`,
makes the interpretation of the bitvector `Int` and `Nat` agree.
In the case when `n = 0`, then the shift right value equals the integer
interpretation.
```lean
theorem toInt_ushiftRight_eq_ite {x : BitVec w} {n : Nat} :
(x >>> n).toInt = if n = 0 then x.toInt else x.toNat >>> n
```
```lean
theorem toFin_uShiftRight {x : BitVec w} {n : Nat} :
(x >>> n).toFin = x.toFin / (Fin.ofNat' (2^w) (2^n))
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Harun Khan <harun19@stanford.edu>
Co-authored-by: Tobias Grosser <github@grosser.es>
This PR also pulls in some mathlib theorems on testBit and Nat and establishes facts about 2^w that are needed here and which are generally useful for bitvector reasoning.
The following theorem is not generalized to arbitrary x instead of 2, as this would require a condition to be added for x > 1 which would have to be passed to simp each time this theorem should fire.
chore: derive from testBit_two_pow
chore: convert first to prop and then decide
chore: move intMax down as well
chore: add simp set
Add simp-set into this PR
chore: fix simp extension
Move file to src/Lean to fix build
Add prelude
update date
Add university of cambridge as copyright holder
improve naming
use whitespace uniformly
use decide (n = m)
Drop the 'Nat.' namespace
Update src/Init/Data/BitVec/Lemmas.lean
Co-authored-by: Siddharth <siddu.druid@gmail.com>
Update src/Init/Data/BitVec/Lemmas.lean
Co-authored-by: Siddharth <siddu.druid@gmail.com>
Fix build
add some theorems
Revert "add some theorems"
This reverts commit fb97bc2007e371854b40badb3d6014da034c1f5e.
WIP
Shorten proof
Update src/Init/Data/Nat/Lemmas.lean
finish proofs
Update src/Init/Data/BitVec/Lemmas.lean
Co-authored-by: Kim Morrison <scott@tqft.net>
Update src/Init/Data/Nat/Lemmas.lean
Co-authored-by: Kim Morrison <scott@tqft.net>
chore: move BoolToPropSimps
`simp only` will not apply this simproc anymore. Users must now write
`simp only [reduceCtorEq]`. See RFC #5046 for motivation.
This PR also renames simproc to `reduceCtorEq`.
close#5046
@semorrison A few `simp only ...` tactics will probably break in
Mathlib. Fix: include `reduceCtorEq`.
We add a new definition `BitVec.twoPow w i` to represent `(1#w <<< i)`.
This expression is used to test bits when building the multiplication
bitblaster.
Patch 1/?, being peeled from https://github.com/opencompl/lean4/pull/6.
---------
Co-authored-by: Tobias Grosser <github@grosser.es>
`Nat.succ_eq_add_one` and `Nat.pred_eq_sub_one` are now simp lemmas. For
theorems about `Nat.succ` or `Nat.pred` without corresponding theorem
for `+ 1` or `- 1`, this adds the corresponding theorem.
we keep running into examples where working with well-founded recursion
is slow because defeq checks (which are all over the place, including
failing ones that are back-tracked) unfold well-founded definitions.
The definition of a function defined by well-founded recursion should be
an implementation detail that should only be peeked inside by the
equation generator and the functional induction generator.
We now mark the mutual recursive function as irreducible (if the user
did not
set a flag explicitly), and use `withAtLeastTransparency .all` when
producing
the equations.
Proofs can be fixed by using rewriting, or – a bit blunt, but nice for
adjusting
existing proofs – using `unseal` (a.k.a. `attribute [local
semireducible]`).
Mathlib performance does not change a whole lot:
http://speed.lean-fro.org/mathlib4/compare/08b82265-75db-4a28-b12b-08751b9ad04a/to/16f46d5e-28b1-41c4-a107-a6f6594841f8
Build instructions -0.126 %, four modules with significant instructions
decrease.
To reduce impact, these definitions were changed:
* `Nat.mod`, to make `1 % n` reduce definitionally, so that `1` as a
`Fin 2` literal
works nicely. Theorems with larger `Fin` literals tend to need a `unseal
Nat.modCore`
https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4098
* `List.ofFn` rewritten to be structurally recursive and not go via
`Array.ofFn`:
https://github.com/leanprover-community/batteries/pull/784
Alternative designs explored were
* Making `WellFounded.fix` irreducible.
One benefit is that recursive functions with equal definitions (possibly
after
instantiating fixed parameters) are defeq; this is used in mathlib to
relate
[`OrdinalApprox.gfpApprox`](https://leanprover-community.github.io/mathlib4_docs/Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/FixedPointApproximants.html#OrdinalApprox.gfpApprox)
with `.lfpApprox`.
But the downside is that one cannot use `unseal` in a
targeted way, being explicit in which recursive function needs to be
reducible here.
And in cases where Lean does unwanted unfolding, we’d still unfold the
recursive
definition once to expose `WellFounded.fix`, leading to large terms for
often no good
reason.
* Defining `WellFounded.fix` to unroll defintionally once before hitting
a irreducible
`WellFounded.fixF`. This was explored in #4002. It shares most of the
ups and downs
with the previous variant, with the additional neat benefit that
function calls that
do not lead to recursive cases (e.g. a `[]` base case) reduce nicely.
This means that
the majority of existing `rfl` proofs continue to work.
Issue #4051, which demonstrates how badly things can go if wf recursive
functions can be
unrolled, showed that making the recursive function irreducible there
leads to noticeably
faster elaboration than making `WellFounded.fix` irreducible; this is
good evidence that
the present PR is the way to go.
This fixes https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/3988
---------
Co-authored-by: Leonardo de Moura <leomoura@amazon.com>
This removes simp attributes from `Nat.succ.injEq` and
`Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub` to replace them with simprocs. This is
because any reductions involving `Nat.succ` has a high risk of leading
proof performance problems when dealing with even moderately large
numbers.
Here are a couple examples that will both report a maximum recursion
depth error currently. These examples are fixed by this PR.
```
example : (123456: Nat) = 12345667 := by
simp
example (x : Nat) (p : x = 0) : 1000 - (x + 1000) = 0 := by
simp
```
