This PR changes how `{...}`/`where` notation ("structure instance
notation") elaborates. The notation now tries to simulate a flat
representation as much as possible, without exposing the details of
subobjects. Features:
- When fields are elaborated, their expected types now have a couple
reductions applied. For all projections and constructors associated to
the structure and its parents, projections of constructors are reduced
and constructors of projections are eta reduced, and also implementation
detail local variables are zeta reduced in propositions (so tactic
proofs should never see them anymore). Furthermore, field values are
beta reduced automatically in successive field types. The example in
[mathlib4#12129](https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129#issuecomment-2056134533)
now shows a goal of `0 = 0` rather than `{ toFun := fun x => x }.toFun 0
= 0`.
- All parents can now be used as field names, not just the subobject
parents. These are like additional sources but with three constraints:
every field of the value must be used, the fields must not overlap with
other provided fields, and every field of the specified parent must be
provided for. Similar to sources, the values are hoisted to `let`s if
they are not already variables, to avoid multiple evaluation. They are
implementation detail local variables, so they get unfolded for
successive fields.
- All class parents are now used to fill in missing fields, not just the
subobject parents. Closes#6046. Rules: (1) only those parents whose
fields are a subset of the remaining fields are considered, (2) parents
are considered only before any fields are elaborated, and (3) only those
parents whose type can be computed are considered (this can happen if a
parent depends on another parent, which is possible since #7302).
- Default values and autoparams now respect the resolution order
completely: each field has at most one default value definition that can
provide for it. The algorithm that tries to unstick default values by
walking up the subobject hierarchy has been removed. If there are
applications of default value priorities, we might consider it in a
future release.
- The resulting constructors are now fully packed. This is implemented
by doing structure eta reduction of the elaborated expressions.
- "Magic field definitions" (as reported [on
Zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/113489-new-members/topic/Where.20is.20sSup.20defined.20on.20submodules.3F/near/499578795))
have been eliminated. This was where fields were being solved for by
unification, tricking the default value system into thinking they had
actually been provided. Now the default value system keeps track of
which fields it has actually solved for, and which fields the user did
not provide. Explicit structure fields (the default kind) without any
explicit value definition will result in an error. If it was solved for
by unification, the error message will include the inferred value, like
"field 'f' must be explicitly provided, its synthesized value is v"
- When the notation is used in patterns, it now no longer inserts fields
using class parents, and it no longer applies autoparams or default
values. The motivation is that one expects patterns to match only the
given fields. This is still imperfect, since fields might be solved for
indirectly.
- Elaboration now attempts error recovery. Extraneous fields log errors
and are ignored, missing fields are filled with `sorry`.
This is a breaking change, but generally the mitigation is to remove
`dsimp only` from the beginnings of proofs. Sometimes "magic fields"
need to be provided — four possible mitigations are (1) to provide the
field, (2) to provide `_` for the value of the field, (3) to add `..` to
the structure instance notation, (4) or decide to modify the `structure`
command to make the field implicit. Lastly, sometimes parent instances
don't apply when they should. This could be because some of the provided
fields overlap with the class, or it could be that the parent depends on
some of the fields for synthesis — and as parents are only considered
before any fields are elaborated, such parents might not be possible to
use — we will look into refining this further.
There is also a change to elaboration: now the `afterTypeChecking`
attributes are run with all `structure` data set up (e.g. the list of
parents, along with all parent projections in the environment). This is
necessary since attributes like `@[ext]` use structure instance
notation, and the notation needs all this data to be set up now.
This PR fixes the `markNestedProofs` procedure used in `grind`. It was
missing the case where the type of a nested proof may contain other
nested proofs.
This PR ensures that `grind` does not use `mkEqMP`. It often triggered
type errors because `grind` uses the `[reducible]` transparency setting
by default. Increasing the transparency setting to default was another
possible, but less efficient fix.
This PR implements basic model-based theory combination in `grind`.
`grind` can now solve examples such as
```lean
example (f : Int → Int) (x : Int)
: 0 ≤ x → x ≠ 0 → x ≤ 1 → f x = 2 → f 1 = 2 := by
grind
```
This PR improves the counterexamples produced by the cutsat procedure,
and adds proper support for `Nat`. Before this PR, the assignment for an
natural variable `x` would be represented as `NatCast.natCast x`.
This PR fixes the support for nonlinear `Nat` terms in cutsat. For
example, cutsat was failing in the following example
```lean
example (i j k l : Nat) : i / j + k + l - k = i / j + l := by grind
```
because we were not adding the fact that `i / j` is non negative when we
inject the `Nat` expression into `Int`.
This PR ensures that we use the same ordering to normalize linear `Int`
terms and relations. This change affects `simp +arith` and `grind`
normalizer.
This consistency is important in the cutsat procedure. We want to avoid
a situation where the cutsat state contains both "atoms":
- `「(NatCast.natCast x + NatCast.natCast y) % 8」`
- `「(NatCast.natCast y + NatCast.natCast x) % 8」`
This was happening because we were using different orderings for
(nested) terms and relations (`=`, `<=`).
This PR fixes the procedure for putting new facts into the `grind`
"to-do" list. It ensures the new facts are preprocessed. This PR also
removes some of the clutter in the `Nat.sub` support.
This PR ensures that `grind` can be used as a more powerful
`contradiction` tactic, sparing the user from having to type `exfalso;
grind` or `intros; exfalso; grind`.
This PR enables the elaboration of theorem bodies, i.e. proofs, to
happen in parallel to each other as well as to other elaboration tasks.
Specifically, to be eligible for parallel proof elaboration,
* the theorem must not be in a `mutual` block
* `deprecated.oldSectionVars` must not be set
* `Elab.async` must be set (currently defaults to `true` in the language
server, `false` on the cmdline)
To be activated for downstream projects (i.e. in stage 1) pending
further Mathlib validation.
This PR prefers using `∅` instead of `.empty` functions. We may later
rename `.empty` functions to avoid the naming clash with
`EmptyCollection`, and to better express semantics of functions which
take an optional capacity argument.
This PR allows the use of `dsimp` during preprocessing of well-founded
definitions. This fixes regressions when using `if-then-else` without
giving a name to the condition, but where the condition is needed for
the termination proof, in cases where that subexpression is reachable
only by dsimp, but not by simp (e.g. inside a dependent let)
Also fixes some preprocessing lemmas to not be bad simp lemmas (with
lambdas on the LHS, due to dot notation and unfortunate argument order)
This fixes#7408.
This PR makes the docstrings in the `Char` namespace follow the
documentation conventions.
---------
Co-authored-by: Markus Himmel <markus@himmel-villmar.de>
