This PR reworks the `simp` set around the `Id` monad, to not elide or
unfold `pure` and `Id.run`
In particular, it stops encoding the "defeq abuse" of `Id X = X` in the
statements of theorems, instead using `Id.run` and `pure` to pass back
and forth between these two spellings. Often when writing these with
`pure`, they generalize to other lawful monads; though such changes were
split off to other PRs.
This fixes the problem with the current simp set where `Id.run (pure x)`
is simplified to `Id.run x`, instead of the desirable `x`.
This is particularly bad because the` x` is sometimes inferred with type
`Id X` instead of `X`, which prevents other `simp` lemmas about `X` from
firing.
Making `Id` reducible instead is not an option, as then the `Monad`
instances would have nothing to key on.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Graf <sg@lean-fro.org>
Co-authored-by: Kim Morrison <kim@tqft.net>
Co-authored-by: Paul Reichert <6992158+datokrat@users.noreply.github.com>
I'd previously added an instance from `ForIn'` to `ForIn`, but this then
caused some non-defeq duplication. It seems fine to just remove the
concrete `ForIn` instances in cases where the `ForIn'` instance exists
too. We can even remove a number of type-specific lemmas in favour of
the general ones.
