This PR improves the `#print` command for structures to show all fields
and which parents the fields were inherited from, hiding internal
details such as which parents are represented as subobjects. This
information is still present in the constructor if needed. The pretty
printer for private constants is also improved, and it now handles
private names from the current module like any other name; private names
from other modules are made hygienic.
Example output for `#print Monad`:
```
class Monad.{u, v} (m : Type u → Type v) : Type (max (u + 1) v)
number of parameters: 1
parents:
Monad.toApplicative : Applicative m
Monad.toBind : Bind m
fields:
Functor.map : {α β : Type u} → (α → β) → m α → m β
Functor.mapConst : {α β : Type u} → α → m β → m α
Pure.pure : {α : Type u} → α → m α
Seq.seq : {α β : Type u} → m (α → β) → (Unit → m α) → m β
SeqLeft.seqLeft : {α β : Type u} → m α → (Unit → m β) → m α
SeqRight.seqRight : {α β : Type u} → m α → (Unit → m β) → m β
Bind.bind : {α β : Type u} → m α → (α → m β) → m β
constructor:
Monad.mk.{u, v} {m : Type u → Type v} [toApplicative : Applicative m] [toBind : Bind m] : Monad m
resolution order:
Monad, Applicative, Bind, Functor, Pure, Seq, SeqLeft, SeqRight
```
Suggested by Floris van Doorn [on
Zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/270676-lean4/topic/.23print.20command.20for.20structures/near/482503637).
I made a few choices so far that can probably be discussed:
- got rid of `modn` on `UInt`, nobody seems to use it apart from the
definition of `shift` which can use normal `mod`
- removed the previous defeq optimized definition of `USize.size` in
favor for a normal one. The motivation was to allow `OfNat` to work
which doesn't seem to be necessary anymore afaict.
- Minimized uses of `.val`, should we maybe mark it deprecated?
- Mostly got rid of `.val` in basically all theorems as the proper next
level of API would now be `.toBitVec`. We could probably re-prove them
but it would be more annoying given the change of definition.
- Did not yet redefine `log2` in terms of `BitVec` as this would require
a `log2` in `BitVec` as well, do we want this?
- I added a couple of theorems around the relation of `<` on `UInt` and
`Nat`. These were previously not needed because defeq was used all over
the place to save us. I did not yet generalize these to all types as I
wasn't sure if they are the appropriate lemma that we want to have.
