This PR modifies the syntax for tactic configurations. Previously just
`(ident` would commit to tactic configuration item parsing, but now it
needs to be `(ident :=`. This enables reliably using tactic
configurations before the `term` category. For example, given `syntax
"my_tac" optConfig term : tactic`, it used to be that `my_tac (x + y)`
would have an error on `+` with "expected `:=`", but now it parses the
term.
An additional rationale is that these are like named arguments; (1)
terms can't begin with named arguments so now there is no parsing
ambiguity and (2) `Parser.Term.namedArgument` indeed already includes
`:=` in the atomic part.
This PR adds support for non-commutative ring normalization in `grind`.
The new normalizer also accounts for the `IsCharP` type class. Examples:
```lean
open Lean Grind
variable (R : Type u) [Ring R]
example (a b : R) : (a + 2 * b)^2 = a^2 + 2 * a * b + 2 * b * a + 4 * b^2 := by grind
example (a b : R) : (a + 2 * b)^2 = a^2 + 2 * a * b + -b * (-4) * a - 2*b*a + 4 * b^2 := by grind
variable [IsCharP R 4]
example (a b : R) : (a - b)^2 = a^2 - a * b - b * 5 * a + b^2 := by grind
example (a b : R) : (a - b)^2 = 13*a^2 - a * b - b * 5 * a + b*3*b*3 := by grind
```
This PR fixes a few bugs in the `rw` tactic: it could "steal" goals
because they appear in the type of the rewrite, it did not do an occurs
check, and new proof goals would not be synthetic opaque. This PR also
lets the `rfl` tactic assign synthetic opaque metavariables so that it
is equivalent to `exact rfl`.
Implementation note: filtering old vs new is not sufficient. This PR
partially addresses the bug where the rw tactic creates natural
metavariables for each of the goals; now new proof goals are synthetic
opaque.
Metaprogramming API: Instead of `Lean.MVarId.rewrite` prefer
`Lean.Elab.Tactic.elabRewrite` for elaborating rewrite theorems and
applying rewrites to expressions.
Closes#10172
This PR adds a `pp.unicode` option and a `unicode("→", "->")` syntax
description alias for the lower-level `unicodeSymbol "→" "->"` parser.
The syntax is added to the `notation` command as well. When `pp.unicode`
is true (the default) then the first form is used when pretty printing,
and otherwise the second ASCII form is used. A variant, `unicode("→",
"->", preserveForPP)` causes the `->` form to be preferred; delaborators
can insert `→` directly into the syntax, which will be pretty printed
as-is; this allows notations like `fun` to use custom options such as
`pp.unicode.fun` to opt into the unicode form when pretty printing.
Additionally:
- Adds more documentation for the `symbol` and `nonReservedSymbol`
parser descriptions.
- Adds documentation for the
`infix`/`infixr`/`infixl`/`prefix`/`postfix` commands.
- The parenthesizers for symbols are improved to backtrack if the atom
doesn't match.
- Fixes a bug where `&"..."` symbols aren't validated.
This is partial progress for issue #1056. What remains is enabling
`unicode(...)` for mixfix commands and then making use of it for core
notation.
This PR adds range support to`BitVec` and the `UInt*` types. This means
that it is now possible to write, for example, `for i in (1 : UInt8)...5
do`, in order to loop over the values 1, 2, 3 and 4 of type `UInt8`.
This PR adds more lemmas about the `toList` and `toArray` functions on
ranges and iterators. It also renames `Array.mem_toArray` into
`List.mem_toArray`.
This PR is followup to the change in grind pattern heuristics from
#10342, typically resolving the discrepancy by writing out an explicit
`grind_pattern` for the intended pattern. The new behaviour is more
aggressive, because it selects smaller patterns.
This PR completes the review of `@[grind]` annotations without a sigil
(e.g. `=` or `←`), replacing most of them with more specific annotations
or patterns.
---------
Co-authored-by: Leonardo de Moura <leomoura@amazon.com>
This PR moves the definitions and basic facts about `Function.Injective`
and `Function.Surjective` up from Mathlib. We can do a better job of
arguing via injectivity in `grind` if these are available.
This PR updates `@[grind]` annotations which should be `@[grind =]`, for
robustness (and, presumably, in some fraction of cases the existing
heuristic for `@[grind]` is already too liberal).
This PR makes it possible to write custom interpolation notation which
treats interpolated `String`s specially.
Sometimes it is desirable for `let w := "world"; foo!"hello {w}"` and
`foo!"hello world"` to mean different things; for instance, if debugging
and wanting to show all interpolands with `repr`. The current approach
forces `hello` to also be rendered with `repr`, which is not desirable.
This doesn't modify any existing formatters.
Requested in [#lean4 > ✔ dbg_trace should use `Repr` instance @
💬](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/270676-lean4/topic/.E2.9C.94.20dbg_trace.20should.20use.20.60Repr.60.20instance/near/495082575)
---------
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Ullrich <sebasti@nullri.ch>
This PR removes `grind →` annotations that fire too often, unhelpfully.
It would be nice for `grind` to instantiate these lemmas, but only if
they already see `xs ++ ys` and `#[]` in the same equivalence class, not
just as soon as it sees `xs ++ ys`.
In the meantime, let's see what is using these.
This PR introduces limited functionality frontends `cutsat` and
`grobner` for `grind`. We disable theorem instantiation (and case
splitting for `grobner`), and turn off all other solvers. Both still
allow `grind` configuration options, so for example one can use `cutsat
+ring` (or `grobner +cutsat`) to solve problems that require both.
For `cutsat`, it is helpful to instantiate a limited set of theorems
(e.g. `Nat.max_def`). Currently this isn't supported, but we intend to
add this later.
This PR changes the string interpolation procedure to omit redundant
empty parts. For example `s!"{1}{2}"` previously elaborated to `toString
"" ++ toString 1 ++ toString "" ++ toString 2 ++ toString ""` and now
elaborates to `toString 1 ++ toString 2`.
- [x] Updated docstrings for `simp!`, `simp_all!`, `dsimp!` to use
user-friendly language
- [x] Updated docstrings for `autoUnfold` fields to use user-friendly
language
- [x] Fixed broken test by updating expected output for simp! hover
documentation
- [x] Replaced technical terms with clear language: "will unfold
applications of functions defined by pattern matching, when one of the
patterns applies"
<!-- START COPILOT CODING AGENT TIPS -->
---
💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions,
customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context
Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more [Copilot coding agent
tips](https://gh.io/copilot-coding-agent-tips) in the docs.
---------
Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: nomeata <148037+nomeata@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR adds missing `grind` normalization rules for `natCast` and
`intCast` Examples:
```
open Lean.Grind
variable (R : Type) (a b : R)
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
example (m n : Nat) : (m + n) • a = m • a + n • a := by grind
example (m n : Nat) : (m * n) • a = m • (n • a) := by grind
end CommSemiring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R]
example (m n : Nat) : (m + n) • a = m • a + n • a := by grind
example (m n : Nat) : (m * n) • a = m • (n • a) := by grind
example (m n : Int) : (m * n) • (a * b) = (m • a) * (n • b) := by grind
end CommRing
```
This PR makes `IO.RealWorld` opaque. It also adds a new compiler -only
`lcRealWorld` constant to represent this type within the compiler. By
default, an opaque type definition is treated like `lcAny`, whereas we
want a more efficient representation. At the moment, this isn't a big
difference, but in the future we would like to completely erase
`IO.RealWorld` at runtime.
This PR offers an alternative `noConfusion` construction for the
off-diagonal use (i.e. for different constructors), based on comparing
the `.ctorIdx`. This should lead to faster type checking, as the kernel
only has to reduce `.ctorIdx` twice, instead of the complicate
`noConfusionType` construction.
This PR prepares for a future reorganization of the import hierarchy so
that `Init.Data.String.Basic` can import `Init.Data.UInt.Bitwise` and
`Init.Data.Array.Lemmas`.
This PR moves `String.utf8EncodeChar` to the prelude to prepare for the
imminent redefinition of `String`.
The definition in the prelude uses modulo and division operations on
natural numbers. In `String.Extra`, a `csimp` lemma is provided, showing
that the new definition is equal to the previous one (which is now
called `utf8EncodeCharFast`) which uses bitwise operations on `UInt8`.
This PR adds the auxiliary theorem `Lean.Grind.Linarith.eq_normN` for
normalizing `NatModule` equations when the instance `AddRightCancel` is
not available.
This PR implements the infrastructure for supporting `NatModule` in
`grind linarith` and uses it to handle disequalities. Another PR will
add support for equalities and inequalities. Example:
```lean
open Lean Grind
variable (M : Type) [NatModule M] [AddRightCancel M]
example (x y : M) : 2 • x + 3 • y + x = 3 • (x + y) := by
grind
```
This PR improves the names of definitions and lemmas in the polymorphic
range API. It also introduces a recommended spelling. For example, a
left-closed, right-open range is spelled `Rco` in analogy with Mathlib's
`Ico` intervals.
This PR speeds up auto-completion by a factor of ~3.5x through various
performance improvements in the language server. On one machine, with
`import Mathlib`, completing `i` used to take 3200ms and now instead
yields a result in 920ms.
Specifically, the following improvements are made:
- The watchdog process no longer de-serializes and re-serializes most
messages from the file worker before passing them on to the user - a
fast partial de-serialization procedure is now used to determine whether
the message needs to be de-serialized in full or not.
- `escapePart` is optimized to perform better on ASCII strings that do
not need escaping.
- `Json.compress` is optimized to allocate fewer objects.
- A faster JSON compression specifically for completion responses is
implemented that skips allocating `Json` altogether.
- The JSON compression has been moved to the task where we convert a
request response to `Json` so that converting to a string won't block
the output task of the FileWorker and so the `Json` value is not marked
as multi-threaded when we compress is, which drastically increases the
cost of reference-counting.
- The JSON representation of the `data?` field of each completion item
is optimized.
- Both the completion kind and the set of completion tags for each
imported completion item is now cached.
- The filtering of duplicate completion items is optimized.
Other adjustments:
- `LT UInt8` and `LE UInt8` are moved to Prelude so that they can be
used in `Init.Meta` for the name part escaping fast path.
- `Array.usize` is exposed since it was marked as `@[simp]`.
This PR fixes a bug in the `LinearOrderPackage.ofOrd` factory. If there
is a `LawfulEqOrd` instance available, it should automatically use it
instead of requiring the user to provide the `eq_of_compare` argument to
the factory. The PR also solves a hygiene-related problem making the
factories fail when `Std` is not open.
This PR adds some test cases for `grind` working with `Fin`. There are
many still failing tests in `tests/lean/grind/grind_fin.lean` which I'm
intending to triage and work on.
This PR adds `MonoBind` for more monad transformers. This allows using
`partial_fixpoint` for more complicated monads based on `Option` and
`EIO`. Example:
```lean-4
abbrev M := ReaderT String (StateT String.Pos Option)
def parseAll (x : M α) : M (List α) := do
if (← read).atEnd (← get) then
return []
let val ← x
let list ← parseAll x
return val :: list
partial_fixpoint
```
This PR is the result of analyzing the elaborator performance regression
introduced by #10005. It makes the `workspaceSymboldNewRanges` and
`iterators` benchmarks less noisy. It also replaces some range-related
instances for `Nat` with shortcuts to the general-purpose instances.
This is a trade-off between the ergonomics and the synthesis cost of
having general-purpose instances.
This PR implements equality propagation from the new AC module into the
`grind` core. Examples:
```lean
example {α β : Sort u} (f : α → β) (op : α → α → α) [Std.Associative op] [Std.Commutative op]
(a b c d : α) : op a (op b b) = op d c → f (op (op b a) (op b c)) = f (op c (op d c)) := by
grind only
example (a b c : Nat) : min a (max b (max c 0)) = min (max c b) a := by
grind -cutsat only
example {α β : Sort u} (bar : α → β) (op : α → α → α) [Std.Associative op] [Std.IdempotentOp op]
(a b c d e f x y w : α) :
op d (op x c) = op a b →
op e (op f (op y w)) = op (op d a) (op b c) →
bar (op d (op x c)) = bar (op e (op f (op y w))) := by
grind only
```
This PR adds the extra critical pairs to ensure the `grind ac` procedure
is complete when the operator is associative and idempotent, but not
commutative. Example:
```lean
example {α : Sort u} (op : α → α → α) [Std.Associative op] [Std.IdempotentOp op] (a b c d e f x y w : α)
: op d (op x c) = op a b →
op e (op f (op y w)) = op a (op b c) →
op d (op x c) = op e (op f (op y w)) := by
grind only
example {α : Sort u} (op : α → α → α) [Std.Associative op] [Std.IdempotentOp op] (a b c d e f x y w : α)
: op a (op d x) = op b c →
op e (op f (op y w)) = op a (op b c) →
op a (op d x) = op e (op f (op y w)) := by
grind only
```
This PR adds the extra critical pairs to ensure the `grind ac` procedure
is complete when the operator is AC and idempotent. Example:
```lean
example {α : Sort u} (op : α → α → α) [Std.Associative op] [Std.Commutative op] [Std.IdempotentOp op]
(a b c d : α) : op a (op b b) = op d c → op (op b a) (op b c) = op c (op d c) := by
grind only
```
This PR adds the inverse of a dyadic rational, at a given precision, and
characterising lemmas. Also cleans up various parts of the `Int.DivMod`
and `Rat` APIs, and proves some characterising lemmas about
`Rat.toDyadic`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Rob23oba <152706811+Rob23oba@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR adds superposition for associative (but non-commutative)
operators in `grind ac`. Examples:
```lean
example {α} (op : α → α → α) [Std.Associative op] (a b c d : α)
: op a b = c →
op b a = d →
op (op c a) (op b c) = op (op a d) (op d b) := by
grind
example {α} (a b c d : List α)
: a ++ b = c →
b ++ a = d →
c ++ a ++ b ++ c = a ++ d ++ d ++ b := by
grind only
```
This PR implements the proof terms for the new `grind ac` module.
Examples:
```lean
example {α : Sort u} (op : α → α → α) [Std.Associative op] (a b c d : α)
: op a (op b b) = op c d → op c (op d c) = op (op a b) (op b c) := by
grind only
example {α : Sort u} (op : α → α → α) [Std.Associative op] [Std.Commutative op] (a b c d : α)
: op a (op b b) = op d c → op (op b a) (op b c) = op c (op d c) := by
grind only
example {α : Sort u} (op : α → α → α) [Std.Associative op] [Std.Commutative op]
(one : α) [Std.LawfulIdentity op one] (a b c d : α)
: op a (op (op b one) b) = op d c → op (op b a) (op (op b one) c) = op (op c one) (op d c) := by
grind only
```
The `grind ac` module is not complete yet, we still need to implement
critical pair computation and fix the support for idempotent operators.
