This PR improves the `#print` command for structures to show all fields
and which parents the fields were inherited from, hiding internal
details such as which parents are represented as subobjects. This
information is still present in the constructor if needed. The pretty
printer for private constants is also improved, and it now handles
private names from the current module like any other name; private names
from other modules are made hygienic.
Example output for `#print Monad`:
```
class Monad.{u, v} (m : Type u → Type v) : Type (max (u + 1) v)
number of parameters: 1
parents:
Monad.toApplicative : Applicative m
Monad.toBind : Bind m
fields:
Functor.map : {α β : Type u} → (α → β) → m α → m β
Functor.mapConst : {α β : Type u} → α → m β → m α
Pure.pure : {α : Type u} → α → m α
Seq.seq : {α β : Type u} → m (α → β) → (Unit → m α) → m β
SeqLeft.seqLeft : {α β : Type u} → m α → (Unit → m β) → m α
SeqRight.seqRight : {α β : Type u} → m α → (Unit → m β) → m β
Bind.bind : {α β : Type u} → m α → (α → m β) → m β
constructor:
Monad.mk.{u, v} {m : Type u → Type v} [toApplicative : Applicative m] [toBind : Bind m] : Monad m
resolution order:
Monad, Applicative, Bind, Functor, Pure, Seq, SeqLeft, SeqRight
```
Suggested by Floris van Doorn [on
Zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/270676-lean4/topic/.23print.20command.20for.20structures/near/482503637).
Fixes an issue where each alternative in choice nodes would get their
own arguments. Now cdot function expansion is aware of choice nodes.
Also modifies the variable naming so that multi-argument functions like
`(· + ·)` expand as `fun x1 x2 => x1 + x2` rather than `fun x x_1 => x +
x_1`.
Closes#4832
<!--
# Read this section before submitting
* Ensure your PR follows the [External Contribution
Guidelines](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md).
* Please make sure the PR has excellent documentation and tests. If we
label it `missing documentation` or `missing tests` then it needs
fixing!
* Include the link to your `RFC` or `bug` issue in the description.
* If the issue does not already have approval from a developer, submit
the PR as draft.
* The PR title/description will become the commit message. Keep it
up-to-date as the PR evolves.
* If you rebase your PR onto `nightly-with-mathlib` then CI will test
Mathlib against your PR.
* You can manage the `awaiting-review`, `awaiting-author`, and `WIP`
labels yourself, by writing a comment containing one of these labels on
its own line.
* Remove this section, up to and including the `---` before submitting.
-->
See RFC #3644 for a discussion of design choices.
Closes#3644
Given
```lean
structure A where
x : Nat
structure B extends A where
y : Nat
```
rather than pretty printing `{ x := 1, y := 2 : B }` as `{ toA := { x :=
1 }, y := 2 }`, it now pretty prints as `{ x := 1, y := 2 }`.
The option `pp.structureInstances.flatten` controls whether to flatten
structure instances like this.
