This implements the `termination_by structural` syntax proposed in
#3909.
I went with `termination_by structural` over, say,
`termination_by (config := {method := .structural})` mainly because it
was
easier to get going (otherwise I’d have to look into how to define
recursive
parsers, as `Parser.config` depends on `term` and `termination_by` is
part of
term. But also because I find it more ergonomic and aesthetic as a user.
But syntax can still change.
The `termination_by?` syntax will no longer force well-founded
recursion,
and instead the inferred `termination_by structurally` annotation will
be shown
if structural termination is possible.
While I was it, this fixes#4546 the easy way (log errors about but
otherwise
ignore incomplete `termination_by` sets for mutual recursion). Maybe we
get
multiple replacements (#4551), but even then this this good behavior.
Involves a bit of shuffling around `TerimationHints` (now validated for
a
clique already by `PreDefinition.main`) and `TerminationArguments` (now
lifted
out of the `WF` namespace, and a bit simplified).
Fixes#3909
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Kiss <him@richardkiss.com>
this makes `termination_by?` even slicker.
The heuristics is agressive in the non-mutual case (will omit `sizeOf`
if the argument is non-dependent and the `WellFoundedRelation` relation
is via `sizeOfWFRel`.
In the mutual case we'd also have to check the arguments, as they line
up in the termination argument, have the same types. I did not bother at
this point; in the mutual case we omit `sizeOf` only if the argument
type is `Nat`.
As a drive-by fix, `termination_by?` now also works on functions that
have only one plausible measure.
the user can now write `termination_by?` to see the termination argument
inferred by GuessLex, and turn it into `termination_by …` using the “Try
this” widget or a code action.
To be done later, maybe: Avoid writing `sizeOf` if it's not necessary.
