This PR makes `BitVec.getElem` the simp normal form in case a proof is
available and changes `ext` to return `x[i]` + a hypothesis that proves
that we are in-bounds. This aligns `BitVec` further with the API
conventions of the Lean standard datatypes.
We move our proofs to this new normal form, which results in slightly
smaller proofs. With the exception of `getElem_ofFin`, no new API
surface is added as the `getElem` API has already been completed over
the previous months. We also move `getElem_shiftConcat_*` a bit higher
as they are needed in earlier proofs. To keep the changeset small, we do
not update the API of `BVDecide` but insert `←
BitVec.getLsbD_eq_getElem` at the few locations where it is needed.
Finally, we add a simproc for getElem, mirroring the existing ones for
getLsbD/getMsdD.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Keizer <alex@keizer.dev>
This renames `BitVec.getLsb` to `getLsbD` (`D` for "default" value, i.e.
false), and introduces `getLsb?` and `getLsb'` (which we can rename to
`getLsb` after a deprecation cycle).
(Similarly for `getMsb`.)
Also adds a `GetElem` class so we can use `x[i]` and `x[i]?` notation.
Later, we will turn
```
theorem getLsbD_eq_getElem?_getD (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) (h : i < w) :
x.getLsbD i = x[i]?.getD false
```
on as a `@[simp]` lemma.
This PR doesn't attempt to demonstrate the benefits, but I think both
arguments are going to get easier, and this will bring the BitVec API
closer in line to List/Array, etc.
---------
Co-authored-by: Markus Himmel <markus@lean-fro.org>
