This PR avoids a `let` in the elaboration of `forIn`. It was introduced
in https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/commit/f51328ff112 but nothing
seems to break when I simplify the code. This removes an unexpected `let
col✝ :=…` from the “Expected type” view in the Info View and from the
termination proofs.
This PR adds the `Try.Config.merge` flag (`true` by default) to the
`try?` tactic. When set to `true`, `try?` compresses suggestions such
as:
```lean
· induction xs, ys using bla.induct
· grind only [List.length_reverse]
· grind only [bla]
```
into:
```lean
induction xs, ys using bla.induct <;> grind only [List.length_reverse, bla]
```
This PR also ensures `try?` does not generate suggestions that mixes
`grind` and `grind only`, or `simp` and `simp only` tactics.
This PR also adds the `try? +harder` option (previously called `lib`),
but it has not been fully implemented yet.
This PR adds new configuration options to `try?`.
- `try? -only` omits `simp only` and `grind only` suggestions
- `try? +missing` enables partial solutions where some subgoals are
"solved" using `sorry`, and must be manually proved by the user.
- `try? (max:=<num>)` sets the maximum number of suggestions produced
(default is 8).
This PR adds support for more complex suggestions in `try?`. Example:
```lean
example (as : List α) (a : α) : concat as a = as ++ [a] := by
try?
```
suggestion
```
Try this: · induction as, a using concat.induct
· rfl
· simp_all
```
This PR adds the `binderNameHint` gadget. It can be used in rewrite and
simp rules to preserve a user-provided name where possible.
The expression `binderNameHint v binder e` defined to be `e`.
If it is used on the right-hand side of an equation that is applied by a
tactic like `rw` or `simp`,
and `v` is a local variable, and `binder` is an expression that (after
beta-reduction) is a binder
(so `fun w => …` or `∀ w, …`), then it will rename `v` to the name used
in the binder, and remove
the `binderNameHint`.
A typical use of this gadget would be as follows; the gadget ensures
that after rewriting, the local
variable is still `name`, and not `x`:
```
theorem all_eq_not_any_not (l : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
l.all p = !l.any fun x => binderNameHint x p (!p x) := sorry
example (names : List String) : names.all (fun name => "Waldo".isPrefixOf name) = true := by
rw [all_eq_not_any_not]
-- ⊢ (!names.any fun name => !"Waldo".isPrefixOf name) = true
```
This gadget is supported by `simp`, `dsimp` and `rw` in the
right-hand-side of an equation, but not
in hypotheses or by other tactics.
This PR ensures `try?` can suggest tactics that need to reference
inaccessible local names.
Example:
```lean
/--
info: Try these:
• · expose_names; induction as, bs_1 using app.induct <;> grind [= app]
• · expose_names; induction as, bs_1 using app.induct <;> grind only [app]
-/
#guard_msgs (info) in
example : app (app as bs) cs = app as (app bs cs) := by
have bs := 20 -- shadows `bs` in the target
try?
```
This PR adds a convenience command `#info_trees in`, which prints the
info trees generated by the following command. It is useful for
debugging or learning about `InfoTree`.
This PR adds support for changing the binder annotations of existing
variables to and from strict-implicit and instance-implicit using the
`variable` command.
This PR requires a stage0 update to fully take effect.
Closes#6078
This PR starts on the process of cleaning up variable names across
List/Array/Vector. For now, we just rename "numerical index" variables
in one file. This is driven by a custom linter.
This PR adds SMT-LIB operators to detect overflow
`BitVec.(uadd_overflow, sadd_overflow)`, according to the definitions
[here](https://github.com/SMT-LIB/SMT-LIB-2/blob/2.7/Theories/FixedSizeBitVectors.smt2),
and the theorems proving equivalence of such definitions with the
`BitVec` library functions (`uaddOverflow_eq`, `saddOverflow_eq`).
Support theorems for these proofs are `BitVec.toNat_mod_cancel_of_lt,
BitVec.toInt_lt, BitVec.le_toInt, Int.bmod_neg_iff`. The PR also
includes a set of tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: Tobias Grosser <github@grosser.es>
Co-authored-by: Alex Keizer <alex@keizer.dev>
Co-authored-by: Tobias Grosser <tobias@grosser.es>
Co-authored-by: Siddharth Bhat <siddu.druid@gmail.com>
This PR adds error messages for `inductive` declarations with
conflicting constructor names and `mutual` declarations with conflicting
names.
Closes#6694.
This includes the examples from issues #2961, #3219 and #5667 in our
test suite, so that we know when (accidentially) fix them.
In fact this closes#3219, which (judging from the nightlies) was fixed
last week by #6901.
This PR adds preliminary support for inlay hints, as well as support for
inlay hints that denote the auto-implicits of a function. Hovering over
an auto-implicit displays its type and double-clicking the auto-implicit
inserts it into the text document.
This PR is an extension of #3910.
### Known issues
- In VS Code, when inserting an inlay hint, the inlay hint may linger
for a couple of seconds before it disappears. This is a defect of the VS
Code implementation of inlay hints and cannot adequately be resolved by
us.
- When making a change to the document, it may take a couple of seconds
until the inlay hints respond to the change. This is deliberate and
intended to reduce the amount of inlay hint flickering while typing. VS
Code has a mechanism of its own for this, but in my experience it is
still far too sensitive without additional latency.
- Inserting an auto-implicit inlay hint that depends on an auto-implicit
meta-variable causes a "failed to infer binder type" error. We can't
display these meta-variables in the inlay hint because they don't have a
user-displayable name, so it is not clear how to resolve this problem.
- Inlay hints are currently always resolved eagerly, i.e. we do not
support the `textDocument/inlayHint/resolve` request yet. Implementing
support for this request is future work.
### Other changes
- Axioms did not support auto-implicits due to an oversight in the
implementation. This PR ensures they do.
- In order to reduce the amount of inlay hint flickering when making a
change to the document, the language server serves old inlay hints for
parts of the file that have not been processed yet. This requires LSP
request handler state (that sometimes must be invalidated on
`textDocument/didChange`), so this PR introduces the notion of a
stateful LSP request handler.
- The partial response mechanism that we use for semantic tokens, where
we simulate incremental LSP responses by periodically emitting refresh
requests to the client, is generalized to accommodate both inlay hints
and semantic tokens. Additionally, it is made more robust to ensure that
we never emit refresh requests while a corresponding request is in
flight, which causes VS Code to discard the respond of the request, as
well as to ensure that we keep prompting VS Code to send another request
if it spuriously decides not to respond to one of our refresh requests.
- The synthetic identifier of an `example` had the full declaration as
its (non-canonical synthetic) range. Since we need a reasonable position
for the identifier to insert an inlay hint for the auto-implicits of an
`example`, we change the (canonical synthetic) range of the synthetic
identifier to that of the `example` keyword.
- The semantic highlighting request handling is moved to a separate
file.
### Breaking changes
- The semantic highlighting request handler is not a pure request
handler anymore, but a stateful one. Notably, this means that clients
that extend the semantic highlighting of the Lean language server with
the `chainLspRequestHandler` function must now use the
`chainStatefulLspRequestHandler` function instead.
This PR modifies `rewrite`/`rw` to abort rewriting if the elaborated
lemma has any immediate elaboration errors (detected by presence of
synthetic sorries). Rewriting still proceeds if there are elaboration
issues arising from pending synthetic metavariables, like instance
synthesis failures. The purpose of the change is to avoid obscure
"tactic 'rewrite' failed, equality or iff proof expected ?m.5" errors
when for example a lemma does not exist.
This helps error reporting for the natural number game.
https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/113489-new-members/topic/Why.20doesn't.20add_left_comm.20work.20here.3F/near/497060022
This PR fixes the `#discr_tree_simp_key` command, because it displays
the keys for just `lhs` in `lhs ≠ rhs`, but it should be `lhs = rhs`,
since that is what simp indexes.
This PR adds the tactic `expose_names`. It creates a new goal whose
local context has been "exposed" so that every local declaration has a
clear, accessible name. If no local declarations require renaming, the
original goal is returned unchanged.
This tactic will be used to improve `try?`.
This PR implements two rules for bv_decide's preprocessor, lowering
`|||` to `&&&` in order to enable more term sharing + application of
rules about `&&&` as well as rewrites of the form `(a &&& b == -1#w) =
(a == -1#w && b == -1#w)` in order to preserve rewriting behavior that
already existed before this lowering.
This PR enables code generation to proceed in parallel to further
elaboration.
It does not aim to make further refinements such as generating code for
different declarations in parallel or removing the dependency on kernel
checking.
This PR adds a `recommended_spelling` command, which can be used for
recording the recommended spelling of a notation (for example, that the
recommended spelling of `∧` in identifiers is `and`). This information
is then appended to the relevant docstrings for easy lookup.
The function `Lean.Elab.Term.Doc.allRecommendedSpellings` may be used to
obtain a list of all recommended spellings, for example to create a
table that is part of a style guide. In the future, it might be
desirable to be able to partition such a table into smaller tables by
category. This can be added in a future PR.
The implementation is heavily inspired by #4490.
This PR changes how the unfold theorems for well-founded recursion are
created. They are created eagerly (anticipating that the behaivor may be
affected by simp sets soon), and without the detour of going through
equational theorems.
This PR adds a builtin tactic and a builtin attribute that are required
for the tree map. The tactic, `as_aux_lemma`, can generally be used to
wrap the proof term generated by a tactic sequence into a separate
auxiliary lemma in order to keep the proof term small. This can, in rare
cases, be necessary if the proof term will appear multiple times in the
encompassing term. The new attribute, `Std.Internal.tree_tac`, is
internal and should not be used outside of `Std`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Paul Reichert <6992158+datokrat@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR adds the `try?` tactic. This is the first draft, but it can
already solve examples such as:
```lean
example (e : Expr) : e.simplify.eval σ = e.eval σ := by
try?
```
in `grind_constProp.lean`. In the example above, it suggests:
```lean
induction e using Expr.simplify.induct <;> grind?
```
In the same test file, we have
```lean
example (σ₁ σ₂ : State) : σ₁.join σ₂ ≼ σ₂ := by
try?
```
and the following suggestion is produced
```lean
induction σ₁, σ₂ using State.join.induct <;> grind?
```
This PR adds the `grind` configuration option `verbose`. For example,
`grind -verbose` disables all diagnostics. We are going to use this flag
to implement `try?`.
This PR changes the `simpMatch` function, used inside the equation
generator for WF-rec functions, to not do eta-expansion.
This makes the process a bit more robust and disciplined, and avoids
removing match-statements (and introduce projections and dependencies)
that we'd rather split instead.
Also adds more tracing to the equational theorem generator.
Extracted from #6898.
This PR teaches bv_normalize to replace subtractions on one side of an
equality with an addition on the other side, this re-write eliminates a
not + addition in the normalized form so it is easier on the solver.
Note that I also make a point to normalize (1 + ~~~x) to (~~~x + 1) to
limit the amount of boilerplate symmetry theorems we require.
This PR adds the new attributes `[grind =>]` and `[grind <=]` for
controlling pattern selection and minimizing the number of places where
we have to use verbose `grind_pattern` command. It also fixes a bug in
the new pattern selection procedure, and improves the automatic pattern
selection for local lemmas.
The tests `grind_constProp.lean` and `no_grind_constProp.lean` are the
same use case with and without `grind`.
This PR fixes a few `grind` issues exposed by the `grind_constProp.lean`
test.
- Support for equational theorem hypotheses created before invoking
`grind`. Example: applying an induction principle.s
- Support of `Unit`-like types.
- Missing recursion depth checks.
