This is a guard against #10705; if a kernel error is raised when the
return value of this function is eventually checked, it is often
silenced downstream, making it hard to spot the failure.
If we panic here via `assert!`, then the diagnostic cannot be missed.
This PR topologically sorts abstracted vars in
`Meta.Closure.mkValueTypeClosure` if MVars are being abstracted.
Fixes#10705
---------
Co-authored-by: Eric Wieser <efw@google.com>
(Almost) only typos in constant names and doc-strings were considered;
grammar was not considered. Also, along others,
`mkDefinitionValInferrringUnsafe` has been fixed :-)
This PR implements first-class support for nondependent let expressions
in the elaborator; recall that a let expression `let x : t := v; b` is
called *nondependent* if `fun x : t => b` typechecks, and the notation
for a nondependent let expression is `have x := v; b`. Previously we
encoded `have` using the `letFun` function, but now we make use of the
`nondep` flag in the `Expr.letE` constructor for the encoding. This has
been given full support throughout the metaprogramming interface and the
elaborator. Key changes to the metaprogramming interface:
- Local context `ldecl`s with `nondep := true` are generally treated as
`cdecl`s. This is because in the body of a `have` expression the
variable is opaque. Functions like `LocalDecl.isLet` by default return
`false` for nondependent `ldecl`s. In the rare case where it is needed,
they take an additional optional `allowNondep : Bool` flag (defaults to
`false`) if the variable is being processed in a context where the value
is relevant.
- Functions such as `mkLetFVars` by default generalize nondependent let
variables and create lambda expressions for them. The
`generalizeNondepLet` flag (default true) can be set to false if `have`
expressions should be produced instead. **Breaking change:** Uses of
`letLambdaTelescope`/`mkLetFVars` need to use `generalizeNondepLet :=
false`. See the next item.
- There are now some mapping functions to make telescoping operations
more convenient. See `mapLetTelescope` and `mapLambdaLetTelescope`.
There is also `mapLetDecl` as a counterpart to `withLetDecl` for
creating `let`/`have` expressions.
- Important note about the `generalizeNondepLet` flag: it should only be
used for variables in a local context that the metaprogram "owns". Since
nondependent let variables are treated as constants in most cases, the
`value` field might refer to variables that do not exist, if for example
those variables were cleared or reverted. Using `mapLetDecl` is always
fine.
- The simplifier will cache its let dependence calculations in the
nondep field of let expressions.
- The `intro` tactic still produces *dependent* local variables. Given
that the simplifier will transform lets into haves, it would be
surprising if that would prevent `intro` from creating a local variable
whose value cannot be used.
Note that nondependence of lets is not checked by the kernel. To
external checker authors: If the elaborator gets the nondep flag wrong,
we consider this to be an elaborator error. Feel free to typecheck `letE
n t v b true` as if it were `app (lam n t b default) v` and please
report issues.
This PR follows up from #8751, which made sure the nondep flag was
preserved in the C++ interface.
This PR adds the `nondep` field of `Expr.letE` to the C++ data model.
Previously this field has been unused, and in followup PRs the
elaborator will use it to encode `have` expressions (non-dependent
`let`s). The kernel does not verify that `nondep` is correctly applied
during typechecking. The `letE` delaborator now prints `have`s when
`nondep` is true, though `have` still elaborates as `letFun` for now.
Breaking change: `Expr.updateLet!` is renamed to `Expr.updateLetE!`.
This PR also fixes a bug in `Expr.letFun?` and `Expr.letFunAppArgs?`
when the body is not a lambda. In any case, these functions will be
removed once the `Expr.letE (nondep := true)` encoding of `have`
expressions is complete.
This PR fixes a bug in `simp` where it was not resetting the set of
zeta-delta reduced let definitions between `simp` calls. It also fixes a
bug where `simp` would report zeta-delta reduced let definitions that
weren't given as simp arguments (these extraneous let definitions appear
due to certain processes temporarily setting `zetaDelta := true`). This
PR also modifies the metaprogramming interface for the zeta-delta
tracking functions to be re-entrant and to prevent this kind of no-reset
bug from occurring again. Closes#6655.
Re-entrance of this metaprogramming interface is not needed to fix
#6655, but it is needed for some future PRs.
The `tests/lean/run/6655.lean` file has an example of a deficiency of
`simp?`, where `simp?` still over-reports unfolded let declarations.
This is likely due to `withInferTypeConfig` setting `zetaDelta := true`
from within `isDefEq`, but I did not verify this.
This PR supersedes #7539. The difference is that this PR has
`withResetZetaDeltaFVarIds` save and restore `zetaDeltaFVarIds`, but
that PR saves and then extends `zetaDeltaFVarIds` to persist unfolded
fvars. The behavior in this PR lets metaprograms control whether they
want to persist any of the unfolded fvars in this context themselves. In
practice, metaprograms that use `withResetZetaDeltaFVarIds` are creating
many temporary fvars and are doing dependence computations. These
temporary fvars shouldn't be persisted, and also dependence shouldn't be
inferred from the fact that a dependence calculation was done. (Concrete
example: the let-to-have transformation in an upcoming PR can be run
from within simp. Just because let-to-have unfolds an fvar while
calculating dependencies of lets doesn't mean that this fvar should be
included by `simp?`.)
This PR unifies various ways of naming auxiliary declarations in a
conflict-free way and ensures the method is compatible with diverging
branches of elaboration such as parallelism or Aesop-like
backtracking+replaying search.
This PR fixes a bug in `Lean.Meta.Closure` that would introduce
under-applied delayed assignment metavariables, which would keep them
from ever getting instantiated. This bug affected `match` elaboration
when the expected type contained postponed elaboration problems, for
example tactic blocks.
Closes#5925, closes#6354
This PR modifies the signature of the functions `Nat.fold`,
`Nat.foldRev`, `Nat.any`, `Nat.all`, so that the function is passed the
upper bound. This allows us to change runtime array bounds checks to
compile time checks in many places.
This PR changes the signature of `Array.get` to take a Nat and a proof,
rather than a `Fin`, for consistency with the rest of the (planned)
Array API. Note that because of bootstrapping issues we can't provide
`get_elem_tactic` as an autoparameter for the proof. As users will
mostly use the `xs[i]` notation provided by `GetElem`, this hopefully
isn't a problem.
We may restore `Fin` based versions, either here or downstream, as
needed, but they won't be the "main" functions.
---------
Co-authored-by: David Thrane Christiansen <david@davidchristiansen.dk>
This PR changes the signature of `Array.set` to take a `Nat`, and a
tactic-provided bound, rather than a `Fin`.
Corresponding changes (but without the auto-param) for `Array.get` will
arrive shortly, after which I'll go more pervasively through the Array
API.
@Kha I was tired of writing `arbitrary _` :)
There 0 places in the stdlib where the type needs to be provided.
If in the future we need to specify the type we can use
`arbitrary (α := <type>)`
