This PR takes Array-specific lemmas at the end of `Array/Lemmas.lean`
(i.e. material that does not have exact correspondences with
`List/Lemmas.lean`) and moves them to more appropriate homes. More to
come.
This PR adds `Array.replace` and `Vector.replace`, proves the
correspondences with `List.replace`, and reproduces the basic API. In
order to do so, it fills in some gaps in the `List.findX` APIs.
This PR moves away from using `List.get` / `List.get?` / `List.get!` and
`Array.get!`, in favour of using the `GetElem` mediated getters. In
particular it deprecates `List.get?`, `List.get!` and `Array.get?`. Also
adds `Array.back`, taking a proof, matching `List.getLast`.
This PR completes the alignment of lemmas about monadic functions on
`List/Array/Vector`. Amongst other changes, we change the simp normal
form from `List.forM` to `ForM.forM`, and correct the definition of
`List.flatMapM`, which previously was returning results in the incorrect
order. There remain many gaps in the verification lemmas for monadic
functions; this PR only makes the lemmas uniform across
`List/Array/Vector`.
This PR adds lemmas relating the operations on
findIdx?/findFinIdx?/idxOf?/findIdxOf?/eraseP/erase on List and on
Array. It's preliminary to aligning the verification lemmas for
`find...` and `erase...`.
This PR makes `take`/`drop`/`extract` available for each of
`List`/`Array`/`Vector`. The simp normal forms differ, however: in
`List`, we simplify `extract` to `take+drop`, while in `Array` and
`Vector` we simplify `take` and `drop` to `extract`. We also provide
`Array/Vector.shrink`, which simplifies to `take`, but is implemented by
repeatedly popping. Verification lemmas for `Array/Vector.extract` to
follow in a subsequent PR.
This PR makes the signatures of `find` functions across
`List`/`Array`/`Vector` consistent. Verification lemmas will follow in
subsequent PRs.
We were previously quite inconsistent about the signature of
`indexOf`/`findIdx` functions across `List` and `Array`. Moreover, there
are still quite large gaps in the verification lemma coverage for these
even at the `List` level.
My intention is to make the signatures consistent by providing:
`findIdx` / `findIdx?` / `findFinIdx?` (these all take a predicate, and
return respectively a `Nat`, `Option Nat`, `Option (Fin l.length)`) and
similarly `idxOf` / `idxOf?` / `finIdxOf?` (which look for an element)
for each of List/Array/Vector. I've seen enough examples by now where
each variant is genuinely the most convenient at the call-site, so I'm
going to accept the cost of having many closely related functions.
*Hopefully* for the verification lemmas we can simp all of these into
"projections" of the `Option (Fin l.length)` versions, and then only
have to specify that.
However, I will not plan on immediately either filling in the missing
verification lemmas (or even deciding what the simp normal forms
relating these operations are), and just reach parity amongst
List/Array/Vector for what is already there.
This PR adds missing monadic higher order functions on
`List`/`Array`/`Vector`. Only the most basic verification lemmas
(relating the operations on the three container types) are provided for
now.
This PR uniformizes the naming of `enum`/`enumFrom` (on `List`) and
`zipWithIndex` (on `Array` on `Vector`), replacing all with `zipIdx`. At
the same time, we generalize to add an optional `Nat` parameter for the
initial value of the index (which previously existed, only for `List`,
as the separate function `enumFrom`).
This PR changes the arguments of `List/Array.mapFinIdx` from `(f : Fin
as.size → α → β)` to `(f : (i : Nat) → α → (h : i < as.size) → β)`, in
line with the API design elsewhere for `List/Array`.
This PR completes aligning `List`/`Array`/`Vector` lemmas about
`flatten`. `Vector.flatten` was previously missing, and has been added
(for rectangular sizes only). A small number of missing `Option` lemmas
were also need to get the proofs to go through.
This PR adds basic lemmas about lexicographic order on Array and Vector,
achieving parity with List.
Many lemmas are still missing for all three, particularly about how
order interacts with `++`.
This PR replaces `List.lt` with `List.Lex`, from Mathlib, and adds the
new `Bool` valued lexicographic comparatory function `List.lex`. This
subtly changes the definition of `<` on Lists in some situations.
`List.lt` was a weaker relation: in particular if `l₁ < l₂`, then
`a :: l₁ < b :: l₂` may hold according to `List.lt` even if `a` and `b`
are merely incomparable
(either neither `a < b` nor `b < a`), whereas according to `List.Lex`
this would require `a = b`.
When `<` is total, in the sense that `¬ · < ·` is antisymmetric, then
the two relations coincide.
Mathlib was already overriding the order instances for `List α`,
so this change should not be noticed by anyone already using Mathlib.
We simultaneously add the boolean valued `List.lex` function,
parameterised by a `BEq` typeclass
and an arbitrary `lt` function. This will support the flexibility
previously provided for `List.lt`,
via a `==` function which is weaker than strict equality.
This PR ensures that the configuration in `Simp.Config` is used when
reducing terms and checking definitional equality in `simp`.
closes#5455
---------
Co-authored-by: Kim Morrison <kim@tqft.net>
This PR adds lemmas about `Vector.set`, `anyM`, `any`, `allM`, and
`all`.
With these additions, `Vector` is now as in-sync with the `List` API as
`Array` is, and in future I'll be updating both simultaneously.
This PR changes the signature of `Array.swap`, so it takes `Nat`
arguments with tactic provided bounds checking. It also renames
`Array.swap!` to `Array.swapIfInBounds`.
This PR modifies the signature of the functions `Nat.fold`,
`Nat.foldRev`, `Nat.any`, `Nat.all`, so that the function is passed the
upper bound. This allows us to change runtime array bounds checks to
compile time checks in many places.
This PR replaces `Array.feraseIdx` and `Array.insertAt` with
`Array.eraseIdx` and `Array.insertIdx`, both of which take a `Nat`
argument and a tactic-provided proof that it is in bounds. We also have
`eraseIdxIfInBounds` and `insertIdxIfInBounds` which are noops if the
index is out of bounds. We also provide a `Fin` valued version of
`Array.findIdx?`. Together, these quite ergonomically improve the array
indexing safety at a number of places in the compiler/elaborator.
This PR modifies the order of arguments for higher-order `Array`
functions, preferring to put the `Array` last (besides positional
arguments with defaults). This is more consistent with the `List` API,
and is more flexible, as dot notation allows two different partially
applied versions.
This PR changes the signature of `Array.get` to take a Nat and a proof,
rather than a `Fin`, for consistency with the rest of the (planned)
Array API. Note that because of bootstrapping issues we can't provide
`get_elem_tactic` as an autoparameter for the proof. As users will
mostly use the `xs[i]` notation provided by `GetElem`, this hopefully
isn't a problem.
We may restore `Fin` based versions, either here or downstream, as
needed, but they won't be the "main" functions.
---------
Co-authored-by: David Thrane Christiansen <david@davidchristiansen.dk>
This PR changes the signature of `Array.set` to take a `Nat`, and a
tactic-provided bound, rather than a `Fin`.
Corresponding changes (but without the auto-param) for `Array.get` will
arrive shortly, after which I'll go more pervasively through the Array
API.
I'd previously added an instance from `ForIn'` to `ForIn`, but this then
caused some non-defeq duplication. It seems fine to just remove the
concrete `ForIn` instances in cases where the `ForIn'` instance exists
too. We can even remove a number of type-specific lemmas in favour of
the general ones.
