This PR fixes a bug where definitions with nested proofs that contain
`sorry` might not report "warning: declaration uses 'sorry'" if the
proof has the same type as another nested proof from a previous
declaration. The bug only affected log messages; `#print axioms` would
still correctly report uses of `sorryAx`.
The fix is that now the abstract nested proofs procedure does not
consult the aux lemma cache if the proof contains a `sorry`.
Closes#10196
