This PR adds a `warn.sorry` option (default true) that logs the
"declaration uses 'sorry'" warning when declarations contain `sorryAx`.
When false, the warning is not logged.
Closes#8611 (assuming that one would set `warn.sorry` as an extra flag
when building).
Other change: Uses `warn.sorry` when creating auxiliary declarations in
`structure` elaborator, to suppress irrelevant 'sorry' warnings.
We could include the sorries themselves in the message if they are
labeled, letting users "go to definition" to see where the sorries are
coming from.
In an earlier version, added additional information to the warning when
it is a synthetic sorry, since these can be caused by elaboration bugs
and they can also be caused by elaboration failures in previous
declarations. This idea needs some more work, so it's not included.
This PR translates `lean::mk_projections` into Lean, adding
`Lean.Meta.mkProjections`. It also puts `hasLooseBVarInExplicitDomain`
back in sync with the kernel version. Deletes
`src/library/constructions/projection.{h,cpp}`.
This PR adds an addition newline before the "Additional diagnostic
information may be available using the `set_option ... true` command."
messages, to provide better visual separation from the main error
message.
This message is often incorporated into source files via `#guard_msgs`.
This change ensures it won't go over the 100 character ruler, and I
think is equally grammatical. :-)
It is confusing that the message suggesting to use the `diagnostics`
option is given even when the option is already set. This PR makes use
of lazy message data to make the message contingent on the option being
false.
It also tones down the promise that there is any diagonostic information
available, since sometimes there is nothing to report.
Suggested by Johan Commelin.
this is the simplest of the constructions to be ported from C++ to Lean,
so I’ll PR this one first.
This begins to put each construction into its own file, as it was the
case with C++.
For validation I developed this in a separate repository at
https://github.com/nomeata/lean-constructions/tree/fad715e
and checked that all `.recOn` declarations found in Lean and Mathlib are
identical (per `==`) to the ones produced by the C code.
