This PR improves the “expected type mismatch” error message by omitting
the type's types when they are defeq, and putting them into separate
lines when not.
I found it rather tediuos to parse the error message when the expected
type is long, because I had to find the `:` in the middle of a large
expression somewhere. Also, when both are of sort `Prop` or `Type` it
doesn't add much value to print the sort (and it’s only one hover away
anyways).
This PR adds the `+generalize` option to the `let` and `have` syntaxes.
For example, `have +generalize n := a + b; body` replaces all instances
of `a + b` in the expected type with `n` when elaborating `body`. This
can be likened to a term version of the `generalize` tactic. One can
combine this with `eq` in `have +generalize (eq := h) n := a + b; body`
as an analogue of `generalize h : n = a + b`.
This PR modifies `let` and `have` term syntaxes to be consistent with
each other. Adds configuration options; for example, `have` is
equivalent to `let +nondep`, for *nondependent* lets. Other options
include `+usedOnly` (for `let_tmp`), `+zeta` (for `letI`/`haveI`), and
`+postponeValue` (for `let_delayed)`. There is also `let (eq := h) x :=
v; b` for introducing `h : x = v` when elaborating `b`. The `eq` option
works for pattern matching as well, for example `let (eq := h) (x, y) :=
p; b`.
Future PRs will add these options to tactic syntax, once a stage0 update
has been done.
