I deleted internal links that seemed to have the character of "TODO". I
think that the residual TODO is of little value, given that we plan a
big revamp and revision soon anyway, but I could do it some other way as
well.
so far, our reference manual did not mention these at all, this takes
the discussion of recursive definition out of the “equation compiler”
section, put it into its own section, and expands it a bit.
This is more a MVP doc change to at least mention the features briefly,
and not the most polished and thought through didactic exposition. But
it provides a start for more improvements.
---------
Co-authored-by: Arthur Adjedj <arthur.adjedj@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <scott.morrison@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: David Thrane Christiansen <david@davidchristiansen.dk>
We are considering removing `.` as an alternative for `·` in the
lambda dot notation (e.g., `(·+·)`).
Reasons:
- `.` is not a perfect replacement for `·` (e.g., `(·.insert ·)`)
- `.` is too overloaded: `(f.x)` and `(f .x)` and `(f . x)`. We want to keep the first two.
@Kha I implemented the syntax for structure/class that we discussed this morning.
It is much cleaner. See new tests at `struct2.lean`.
I updated the documentation to use it.
