Although `HEq` was abbreviated as `≍` in #8503, many instances of the
form `HEq x y` still remain.
Therefore, I searched for occurrences of `HEq x y` using the regular
expression `(?<![A-Za-z/@]|``)HEq(?![A-Za-z.])` and replaced as many as
possible with the form `x ≍ y`.
This PR improves the error messages produced by `end` and prevents
invalid `end` commands from closing scopes on failure.
---------
Co-authored-by: Rob23oba <152706811+Rob23oba@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de>
This PR adds support for throwing named errors with associated error
explanations. In particular, it adds elaborators for the syntax defined
in #8649, which use the error-explanation infrastructure added in #8651.
This includes completions, hovers, and jump-to-definition for error
names.
Note that another stage0 rebuild will be required to define explanations
using `register_error_explanation`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de>
Co-authored-by: Marc Huisinga <mhuisi@protonmail.com>
This PR adds a new `BitVec.clz` operation and a corresponding `clz`
circuit to `bv_decide`, allowing to bitblast the count leading zeroes
operation. The AIG circuit is linear in the number of bits of the
original expression, making the bitblasting convenient wrt. rewriting.
`clz` is common in numerous compiler intrinsics (see
[here](https://clang.llvm.org/docs/LanguageExtensions.html#intrinsics-support-within-constant-expressions))
and architectures (see
[here](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Find_first_set)).
Co-authored by @bollu.
---------
Co-authored-by: Tobias Grosser <github@grosser.es>
Co-authored-by: Siddharth <siddu.druid@gmail.com>
This PR allow structures to have non-bracketed binders, making it
consistent with `inductive`.
The change allows the following to be written instead of having to write
`S (n)`:
```lean
structure S n where
field : Fin n
```
This PR removes the auto-generated `binductionOn` and `ibelow`
implementations for inductive types in favor of the improved `brecOn`
implementation from #7639.
This PR makes Lean code generation respect the module name provided
through `lean --setup`.
This is accomplished by porting to Lean the portion of `shell.cpp` that
spans running the frontend to exiting the process. This makes it easier
to load the module setup and control how its name is passed to the code
generation functions. This port attempts to minimize the changes made to
Lean. It marks the new Lean functions `private` and tries to preserve as
faithfully as possible the behavior of the original C++ code. Exposing
the new Lean interface publicly and/or further improving the code now
that is written in Lean is left for the future.
This PR modifies the `structure` elaborator to add local terminfo for
structure fields and explicit parent projections, enabling "go to
definition" when there are dependent fields.
Terminfo for inherited fields is still missing.
This PR adds the `nondep` field of `Expr.letE` to the C++ data model.
Previously this field has been unused, and in followup PRs the
elaborator will use it to encode `have` expressions (non-dependent
`let`s). The kernel does not verify that `nondep` is correctly applied
during typechecking. The `letE` delaborator now prints `have`s when
`nondep` is true, though `have` still elaborates as `letFun` for now.
Breaking change: `Expr.updateLet!` is renamed to `Expr.updateLetE!`.
This PR also fixes a bug in `Expr.letFun?` and `Expr.letFunAppArgs?`
when the body is not a lambda. In any case, these functions will be
removed once the `Expr.letE (nondep := true)` encoding of `have`
expressions is complete.
This PR changes the generated `below` and `brecOn` implementations for
reflexive inductive types to support motives in `Sort u` rather than
`Type u`.
Closes#7638
This PR fixes a bug in `simp` where it was not resetting the set of
zeta-delta reduced let definitions between `simp` calls. It also fixes a
bug where `simp` would report zeta-delta reduced let definitions that
weren't given as simp arguments (these extraneous let definitions appear
due to certain processes temporarily setting `zetaDelta := true`). This
PR also modifies the metaprogramming interface for the zeta-delta
tracking functions to be re-entrant and to prevent this kind of no-reset
bug from occurring again. Closes#6655.
Re-entrance of this metaprogramming interface is not needed to fix
#6655, but it is needed for some future PRs.
The `tests/lean/run/6655.lean` file has an example of a deficiency of
`simp?`, where `simp?` still over-reports unfolded let declarations.
This is likely due to `withInferTypeConfig` setting `zetaDelta := true`
from within `isDefEq`, but I did not verify this.
This PR supersedes #7539. The difference is that this PR has
`withResetZetaDeltaFVarIds` save and restore `zetaDeltaFVarIds`, but
that PR saves and then extends `zetaDeltaFVarIds` to persist unfolded
fvars. The behavior in this PR lets metaprograms control whether they
want to persist any of the unfolded fvars in this context themselves. In
practice, metaprograms that use `withResetZetaDeltaFVarIds` are creating
many temporary fvars and are doing dependence computations. These
temporary fvars shouldn't be persisted, and also dependence shouldn't be
inferred from the fact that a dependence calculation was done. (Concrete
example: the let-to-have transformation in an upcoming PR can be run
from within simp. Just because let-to-have unfolds an fvar while
calculating dependencies of lets doesn't mean that this fvar should be
included by `simp?`.)
This PR changes the `show t` tactic to match its documentation.
Previously it was a synonym for `change t`, but now it finds the first
goal that unifies with the term `t` and moves it to the front of the
goal list.
Replaces the previous `export/saveEntriesFn` split with a stricly more
general function such that `exportEntriesFn` could be deprecated at a
later point. Also gives the new function access to the `Environment`
while we're at it. Also gives `getModuleEntries` access to more olean
levels in preparation for `meta import`.
This PR adds documentation to builtin attributes like `@[refl]` or
`@[implemented_by]`.
Closes#8432
---------
Co-authored-by: David Thrane Christiansen <david@davidchristiansen.dk>
Co-authored-by: David Thrane Christiansen <david@lean-fro.org>
This PR turns off the default warning when using `grind`, in preparation
for v4.22. I'll removing all the `set_option grind.warning false` in our
codebase in a second PR, after an update-stage0.
This PR implements the infrastructure for constructing proof terms in
the linarith procedure in `grind`. It also adds the `ToExpr` instances
for the reified objects.
This PR makes use of `lean --setup` in Lake builds of Lean modules and
adds Lake support for the new `.olean` artifacts produced by the module
system.
Lake now computes the entire transitive import graph of a module for
Lean, allowing it eagerly provide the artifacts managed by Lake to Lean
via the `modules` field of `lean --setup`.
`lake setup-file` no longer respects the imports passed to it and
instead just parses the file's header for imports. This is necessary
because import statements are now more complex than a simple module
name.
This PR introduces an explicit `defeq` attribute to mark theorems that
can be used by `dsimp`. The benefit of an explicit attribute over the
prior logic of looking at the proof body is that we can reliably omit
theorem bodies across module boundaries. It also helps with intra-file
parallelism.
If a theorem is syntactically defined by `:= rfl`, then the attribute is
assumed and need not given explicitly. This is a purely syntactic check
and can be fooled, e.g. if in the current namespace, `rfl` is not
actually “the” `rfl` of `Eq`. In that case, some other syntax has be
used, such as `:= (rfl)`. This is also the way to go if a theorem can be
proved by `defeq`, but one does not actually want `dsimp` to use this
fact.
The `defeq` attribute will look at the *type* of the declaration, not
the body, to check if it really holds definitionally. Because of
different reduction settings, this can sometimes go wrong. Then one
should also write `:= (rfl)`, if one does not want this to be a defeq
theorem. (If one does then this is currently not possible, but it’s
probably a bad idea anyways).
The `set_option debug.tactic.simp.checkDefEqAttr true`, `dsimp` will
warn if could not apply a lemma due to a missing `defeq` attribute.
With `set_option backward.dsimp.useDefEqAttr.get false` one can revert
to the old behavior of inferring rfl-ness based on the theorem body.
Both options will go away eventually (too bad we can’t mark them as
deprecated right away, see #7969)
Meta programs that generate theorems (e.g. equational theorems) can use
`inferDefEqAttr` to set the attribute based on the theorem body of the
just created declaration.
This builds on #8501 to update Init to `@[expose]` a fair amount of
definitions that, if not exposed, would prevent some existing `:= rfl`
theorems from being `defeq` theorems. In the interest of starting
backwards compatible, I exposed these function. Hopefully many can be
un-exposed later again.
A mathlib adaption branch exists that includes both the meta programming
fixes and changes to the theorems (e.g. changing `:= by rfl` to `:=
rfl`).
With the module system there is now no special handling for `defeq`
theorem bodies, because we don’t look at the body anymore. The previous
hack is removed. The `defeq`-ness of the theorem needs to be checked in
the context of the theorem’s *type*; the error message contains a hint
if the defeq check fails because of the exported context.
This PR adds the `#print sig $ident` variant of the `#print` command,
which omits the body. This is useful for testing meta-code, in the
```
#guard_msgs (drop trace, all) in #print sig foo
```
idiom. The benefit over `#check` is that it shows the declaration kind,
reducibility attributes (and in the future more built-in attributes,
like `@[defeq]` in #8419). (One downside is that `#check` shows unused
function parameter names, e.g. in induction principles; this could
probably be refined.)
This PR makes the equational theorems of non-exposed defs private. If
the author of a module chose not to expose the body of their function,
then they likely don't want that implementation to leak through
equational theorems. Helps with #8419.
There is some amount of incidential complexity due to how `private`
works in lean, by mangling the name: lots of code paths that need now do
the right thing™ about private and non-private names, including the
whole reserved name machinery.
So this includes a number of refactorings:
* The logic for calculating an equational theorem name (or similar) is
now done by a single function, `mkEqLikeNameFor`, rather than all over
the place.
* Since the name of the equational theorem now depends on the current
context (in particular whether it’s a proper module, or a non-module
file), the forward map from declaration to equational theorem doesn’t
quite work anymore. This map is deleted; the list of equational theorems
are now always found by looking for declaration of the expected names
(`alreadyGenerated). If users define such theorems themselves (and make
it past the “do not allow reserved names to be declared”) they get to
keep both pieces.
* Because this map was deleted, mathlib’s `eqns` command can no longer
easily warn if equational lemmas have already been generated too early
(adaption branch exists). But in general I think lean could provide a
more principled way of supporting custom unfold lemmas, and ideally the
whole equational theorem machinery is just using that.
* The ReservedNamePredicate is used by `resolveExact`, so we need to
make sure that it returns the right name, including privateness. It is
not ok to just reserve both the private and non-private name but then
later in the ReservedNameAction produce just one of the two.
* We create `foo.def_eq` eagerly for well-founded recursion. This is
needed because we need feed in the proof of the rewriting done by
`wf_preprocess`. But if `foo.def_eq` is private in a module, then a
non-module importing it will still expect a non-private `foo.def_eq` to
exist. To patch that, we install a `copyPrivateUnfoldTheorem :
GetUnfoldEqnFn` that declares a theorem aliasing the private one. Seems
to work.
This PR implements signature help support. When typing a function
application, editors with support for signature help will now display a
popup that designates the current (remaining) function type. This
removes the need to remember the function signature while typing the
function application, or having to constantly cycle between hovering
over the function identifier and typing the application. In VS Code, the
signature help can be triggered manually using `Ctrl+Shift+Space`.
### Other changes
- In order to support signature help for the partial syntax `f a <|` or
`f a $`, these notations now elaborate as `f a`, not `f a .missing`.
- The logic in `delabConstWithSignature` that delaborates parameters is
factored out into a function `delabForallParamsWithSignature` so that it
can be used for arbitrary `forall`s, not just constants.
- The `InfoTree` formatter is adjusted to produce output where it is
easier to identify the kind of `Info` in the `InfoTree`.
- A bug in `InfoTree.smallestInfo?` is fixed so that it doesn't panic
anymore when its predicate `p` does not ensure that both `pos?` and
`tailPos?` of the `Info` are present.
This PR makes `guard_msgs.diff=true` the default. The main usage of
`#guard_msgs` is for writing tests, and this makes staring at altered
test outputs considerably less tiring.
This PR makes the lemma `BitVec.extractLsb'_append_eq_ite` more usable
by using the "simple case" more often, and uses this simplification to
make `BitVec.extractLsb'_append_eq_of_add_lt` stronger, renaming it to
`BitVec.extractLsb'_append_eq_of_add_le`.
This PR clarifies the invalid field notation error when projected value
type is a metavariable.
Co-authored-by @sgraf812.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Graf <sg@lean-fro.org>
This PR clarifies the invalid dotted identifier notation error when the
type is a sort.
Co-authored-by @sgraf812.
---------
Co-authored-by: Joseph Rotella <7482866+jrr6@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR implements `match`-expressions in `grind` using `match`
congruence equations. The goal is to minimize the number of `cast`
operations that need to be inserted, and avoid `cast` over functions.
The new approach support `match`-expressions of the form `match h : ...
with ...`.
This PR adds a `value_of% ident` term that elaborates to the value of
the local or global constant `ident`. This is useful for creating
definition hypotheses:
```lean
let x := ... complicated expression ...
have hx : x = value_of% x := rfl
```
