Commit graph

155 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sebastian Ullrich
af1d8dd070 feat: := private instance syntax 2025-05-28 10:18:04 +02:00
euprunin
88078930a9
chore: fix spelling mistakes (#8324)
Co-authored-by: euprunin <euprunin@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-05-14 06:52:16 +00:00
euprunin
2ea675369f
chore: fix spelling mistakes (#7328)
Co-authored-by: euprunin <euprunin@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-04-07 01:15:48 +00:00
Kyle Miller
34142685a9
fix: use more reduction when computing parent types (#7764)
This PR adds in more normalization for the routine that computes a
parent type. Some mathlib adaptations are the result of not reducing the
type parameters.
2025-04-01 02:48:17 +00:00
Kyle Miller
d6303a8e7f
refactor: factor out common code for structure default values (#7737)
This PR factors out a `Lean.Meta.instantiateStructDefaultValueFn?`
function for instantiating default values for fields.
2025-03-31 22:40:39 +00:00
Kyle Miller
96ddeea84e
fix: fix FieldInfo for structure instance notation (#7745)
This PR fixes an oversight in #7717, and now fields get a FieldInfo node
with the correct projection function.

Note that for copied fields "go to definition" still does not go
anywhere, since copied projection function has no declaration range. We
probably should make such fields instead go to the origin projection
function.
2025-03-31 04:27:13 +00:00
Kyle Miller
3f98f6bc07
feat: structure instance notation elaboration improvements (#7717)
This PR changes how `{...}`/`where` notation ("structure instance
notation") elaborates. The notation now tries to simulate a flat
representation as much as possible, without exposing the details of
subobjects. Features:
- When fields are elaborated, their expected types now have a couple
reductions applied. For all projections and constructors associated to
the structure and its parents, projections of constructors are reduced
and constructors of projections are eta reduced, and also implementation
detail local variables are zeta reduced in propositions (so tactic
proofs should never see them anymore). Furthermore, field values are
beta reduced automatically in successive field types. The example in
[mathlib4#12129](https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129#issuecomment-2056134533)
now shows a goal of `0 = 0` rather than `{ toFun := fun x => x }.toFun 0
= 0`.
- All parents can now be used as field names, not just the subobject
parents. These are like additional sources but with three constraints:
every field of the value must be used, the fields must not overlap with
other provided fields, and every field of the specified parent must be
provided for. Similar to sources, the values are hoisted to `let`s if
they are not already variables, to avoid multiple evaluation. They are
implementation detail local variables, so they get unfolded for
successive fields.
- All class parents are now used to fill in missing fields, not just the
subobject parents. Closes #6046. Rules: (1) only those parents whose
fields are a subset of the remaining fields are considered, (2) parents
are considered only before any fields are elaborated, and (3) only those
parents whose type can be computed are considered (this can happen if a
parent depends on another parent, which is possible since #7302).
- Default values and autoparams now respect the resolution order
completely: each field has at most one default value definition that can
provide for it. The algorithm that tries to unstick default values by
walking up the subobject hierarchy has been removed. If there are
applications of default value priorities, we might consider it in a
future release.
- The resulting constructors are now fully packed. This is implemented
by doing structure eta reduction of the elaborated expressions.
- "Magic field definitions" (as reported [on
Zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/113489-new-members/topic/Where.20is.20sSup.20defined.20on.20submodules.3F/near/499578795))
have been eliminated. This was where fields were being solved for by
unification, tricking the default value system into thinking they had
actually been provided. Now the default value system keeps track of
which fields it has actually solved for, and which fields the user did
not provide. Explicit structure fields (the default kind) without any
explicit value definition will result in an error. If it was solved for
by unification, the error message will include the inferred value, like
"field 'f' must be explicitly provided, its synthesized value is v"
- When the notation is used in patterns, it now no longer inserts fields
using class parents, and it no longer applies autoparams or default
values. The motivation is that one expects patterns to match only the
given fields. This is still imperfect, since fields might be solved for
indirectly.
- Elaboration now attempts error recovery. Extraneous fields log errors
and are ignored, missing fields are filled with `sorry`.

This is a breaking change, but generally the mitigation is to remove
`dsimp only` from the beginnings of proofs. Sometimes "magic fields"
need to be provided — four possible mitigations are (1) to provide the
field, (2) to provide `_` for the value of the field, (3) to add `..` to
the structure instance notation, (4) or decide to modify the `structure`
command to make the field implicit. Lastly, sometimes parent instances
don't apply when they should. This could be because some of the provided
fields overlap with the class, or it could be that the parent depends on
some of the fields for synthesis — and as parents are only considered
before any fields are elaborated, such parents might not be possible to
use — we will look into refining this further.

There is also a change to elaboration: now the `afterTypeChecking`
attributes are run with all `structure` data set up (e.g. the list of
parents, along with all parent projections in the environment). This is
necessary since attributes like `@[ext]` use structure instance
notation, and the notation needs all this data to be set up now.
2025-03-30 17:40:36 +00:00
Kyle Miller
cde237daea
feat: change structure command to elaborate fields as if structures are flat (#7302)
This PR changes how fields are elaborated in the `structure`/`class`
commands and also makes default values respect the structure resolution
order when there is diamond inheritance. Before, the details of
subobjects were exposed during elaboration, and in the local context any
fields that came from a subobject were defined to be projections of the
subobject field. Now, every field is represented as a local variable.
All parents (not just subobject parents) are now represented in the
local context, and they are now local variables defined to be parent
constructors applied to field variables (inverting the previous
relationship). Other notes:
- The entire collection of parents is processed, and all parent
projection names are checked for consistency. Every parent appears in
the local context now.
- For classes, every parent now contributes an instance, not just the
parents represented as subobjects.
- Default values are now processed according to the parent resolution
order. Default value definition/override auxiliary definitions are
stored at `StructName.fieldName._default`, and inherited values are
stored at `StructName.fieldName._inherited_default`. Metaprograms no
longer need to look at parents when doing calculations on default
values.
- Default value omission for structure instance notation pretty printing
has been updated in consideration of this.
- Now the elaborator generates a `_flat_ctor` constructor that will be
used for structure instance elaboration. All types in this constructor
are put in "field normal form" (projections of parent constructors are
reduced, and parent constructors are eta reduced), and all fields with
autoParams are annotated as such. This is not meant for users, but it
may be useful for metaprogramming.
- While elaborating fields, any metavariables whose type is one of the
parents is assigned to that parent. The hypothesis is that, for the
purpose of elaborating structure fields, parents are fixed: there is
only *one* instance of any given parent under consideration. See the
`Magma` test for an example of this being necessary. The hypothesis may
not be true when there are recursive structures, since different values
of the structure might not agree on parent fields.

Other notes:
- The elaborator has been refactored, and it now uses a monad to keep
track of the elaboration state.
- This PR was motivation for #7100, since we need to be able to make all
parents have consistent projection names when there is diamond
inheritance.

Still to do:
- Handle autoParams like we do default values. Inheritance for these is
not correct when there is diamond inheritance.
- Avoid splitting apart parents if the overlap is only on proof fields.
- Non-subobject parent projections do not have parameter binder kinds
that are consistent with other projections (i.e., all implicit by
default, no inst implicits). This needs to wait on adjustments to the
synthOrder algorithm.
- We could elide parents with no fields, letting their projections be
constant functions. This causes some trouble for defeq checking however
(maybe #2258 would address this).
2025-03-22 22:33:10 +00:00
Sebastian Ullrich
eeca0ce96b
perf: Environment blocker removals from async-proofs branch (#7483) 2025-03-14 13:37:01 +00:00
Kim Morrison
bc234f9f8d
feat: align List/Array/Vector.zip/zipWith/zipWithAll/unzip (#6840)
This PR completes the alignment of
`List/Array/Vector.zip/zipWith/zipWithAll/unzip` lemmas.
2025-01-29 07:58:17 +00:00
Marc Huisinga
dc24ebde2f
fix: ghost goals in autoparam tactic block (#6408)
This PR fixes a regression where goals that don't exist were being
displayed. The regression was triggered by #5835 and originally caused
by #4926.

Bug originally reported at
https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/270676-lean4/topic/tactic.20doesn't.20change.20primary.20goal.20state/near/488957772.

The cause of this issue was that #5835 made certain `SourceInfo`s
canonical, which was directly transferred to several `TacticInfo`s by
#4926. The goal state selection mechanism would then pick up these extra
`TacticInfo`s.

The approach taken by this PR is to ensure that the `SourceInfo` that is
being transferred by #4926 is noncanonical.
2024-12-17 20:57:39 +00:00
Kyle Miller
7b8504cf06
chore: post-stage0 cleanup for #6165 (#6268)
This PR puts code in terms of syntax quotations now that there has been
a stage0 update. Fixes a lingering bug in StructInst where some
intermediate syntax was malformed, but this had no observable effects
outside of some debug messages.
2024-12-01 00:20:59 +00:00
Kyle Miller
a1c3a36433
feat: parity between structure instance notation and where notation (#6165)
This PR modifies structure instance notation and `where` notation to use
the same notation for fields. Structure instance notation now admits
binders, type ascriptions, and equations, and `where` notation admits
full structure lvals. Examples of these for structure instance notation:
```lean
structure PosFun where
  f : Nat → Nat
  pos : ∀ n, 0 < f n

def p : PosFun :=
  { f n := n + 1
    pos := by simp }

def p' : PosFun :=
  { f | 0 => 1
      | n + 1 => n + 1
    pos := by rintro (_|_) <;> simp }
```
Just like for the structure `where` notation, a field `f x y z : ty :=
val` expands to `f := fun x y z => (val : ty)`. The type ascription is
optional.

The PR also is setting things up for future expansion. Pending some
discussion, in the future structure/`where` notation could have have
embedded `where` clauses; rather than `{ a := { x := 1, y := z } }` one
could write `{ a where x := 1; y := z }`.
2024-11-30 20:27:25 +00:00
Kyle Miller
5145030ff4
chore: refactor Elab.StructInst to use mutual for its structures/inductives (#6174)
Making use of #6125.
2024-11-22 19:17:48 +00:00
Marc Huisinga
aadf3f1d2c feat: use new structInstFields parser to tag structure instance fields 2024-11-19 09:26:58 +01:00
Kyle Miller
62ae320e1c
chore: document Lean.Elab.StructInst, refactor (#6110)
This PR does some mild refactoring of the `Lean.Elab.StructInst` module
while adding documentation.

Documentation is drawn from @thorimur's #1928.
2024-11-18 02:57:22 +00:00
Leonardo de Moura
5d553d6369
fix: circular assignment at structure instance elaborator (#6105)
This PR fixes a stack overflow caused by a cyclic assignment in the
metavariable context. The cycle is unintentionally introduced by the
structure instance elaborator.

closes #3150
2024-11-17 00:56:52 +00:00
Kim Morrison
3a408e0e54
feat: change Array.get to take a Nat and a proof (#6032)
This PR changes the signature of `Array.get` to take a Nat and a proof,
rather than a `Fin`, for consistency with the rest of the (planned)
Array API. Note that because of bootstrapping issues we can't provide
`get_elem_tactic` as an autoparameter for the proof. As users will
mostly use the `xs[i]` notation provided by `GetElem`, this hopefully
isn't a problem.

We may restore `Fin` based versions, either here or downstream, as
needed, but they won't be the "main" functions.

---------

Co-authored-by: David Thrane Christiansen <david@davidchristiansen.dk>
2024-11-12 03:30:46 +00:00
Kyle Miller
709ea6cdf8
feat: make it possible to use dot notation in m! strings (#5857)
This default instance makes it possible to write things like `m!"the
constant is {.ofConstName n}"`.

Breaking change: This weakly causes terms to have a type of
`MessageData` if their type is otherwise unknown. For example:
* `m!"... {x} ..."` can cause `x` to have type `MessageData`, causing
the `let` definition of `x` to fail to elaborate. Fix: give `x` an
explicit type.
* Arithmetic expressions in `m!` strings may need a type ascription. For
example, if the type of `i` is unknown at the time the arithmetic
expression is elaborated, then `m!"... {i + 1} ..."` can fail saying
that it cannot find an `HAdd Nat Nat MessageData` instance. Two fixes:
either ensure that the type of `i` is known, or add a type ascription to
guide the `MessageData` coercion, like `m!"... {(i + 1 : Nat)} ..."`.
2024-10-27 22:55:29 +00:00
Kyle Miller
13036655e9
fix: reduce types when constructing default values in structure instance notation (#5844)
A step of expanding structure instances is to determine all the default
values, and part of this is reducing projections that appear in the
default values so that they get replaced with the user-provided values.
Binder types in foralls, lambdas, and lets have to be reduced too.

Closes #2186
2024-10-26 00:45:21 +00:00
Arthur Adjedj
7150a0d538
fix: reduce let-bodies correctly in StructInst (#3152)
Closes #3146

Reduction doesn't trigger correctly on the bodies of `let`-expressions
in `StructInst`, leading some meta-variables to linger in the terms of
some fields. Because of this, default fields may try multiple times (and
fail) to be generated, leading to an unexpected error.

The solution implemented here is to modify the values of the introduced
variables in the local context so as to reduce them correctly.
2024-10-24 23:33:33 +00:00
Kyle Miller
79930af11e
feat: allow explicit mode with field notation (#5528)
Now one can write `@x.f`, `@(x).f`, `@x.1`, `@(x).1`, and so on.

This fixes an issue where structure instance update notation (like `{x
with a := a'}`) could fail if the field `a` had a type with implicit,
optional, or auto parameters.

Closes #5406
2024-10-09 07:03:46 +00:00
euprunin
8f88d94d97
chore: fix spelling mistakes (#5599)
Co-authored-by: euprunin <euprunin@users.noreply.github.com>
2024-10-02 21:32:22 +00:00
Kyle Miller
1b6572726f
feat: have autoparams report parameter/field on failure (#5474)
Adds a mechanism where when an autoparam tactic fails to synthesize a
parameter, the associated parameter name or field name for the autoparam
is reported in an error.

Examples:
```text
could not synthesize default value for parameter 'h' using tactics

could not synthesize default value for field 'inv' of 'S' using tactics
```

Notes:
* Autoparams now run their tactics without any error recovery or
error-to-sorry enabled. This enables catching the error and reporting
the contextual information. This is justified on the grounds that
autoparams are not interactive.
* Autoparams for applications now cleanup the autoParam annotation,
bringing it in line with autoparams for structure fields.
* This preserves the old behavior that autoparams leave terminfo, but we
will revisit this after some imminent improvements to the unused
variable linter.

Closes #2950
2024-09-27 19:00:59 +00:00
Joachim Breitner
72f2e7aab1
feat: make structure type clickable in “not a field” error (#5072) 2024-08-16 09:06:18 +00:00
Markus Himmel
4bac74c4ac chore: switch to Std.HashMap and Std.HashSet almost everywhere 2024-08-07 18:24:42 +02:00
Kyle Miller
6c1f8a8a63
fix: ensure autoparam errors have correct positions (#4926)
Autoparam tactic scripts have no source positions, which until recently
made it so that any errors or messages would be logged at the current
ref, which was the application or structure instance being elaborated.
However, with the new incrementality features the ref is now carefully
managed to avoid leakage of outside data. This inhibits the elaborator's
ref from being used for the tactic's ref, causing messages to be placed
at the beginning of the file rather than on the syntax that triggered
the autoparam.

To fix this, now the elaborators insert the ref's source position
everywhere into the autoparam tactic script.

If in the future messages for synthetic tactics appear at the tops of
files in other contexts, we should consider an approach where
`Lean.Elab.Term.withReuseContext` uses something like `replaceRef` to
set the ref while disabling incrementality when the tactic does not
contain source position information.

Closes #4880
2024-08-06 22:27:51 +00:00
Leonardo de Moura
faea7f98c1
chore: missing registerTraceClass (#4369)
closes #3373
2024-06-06 00:53:16 +00:00
Leonardo de Moura
ec87283465
perf: use withSynthesize when elaborating let/have type (#4096)
closes #4051

cc @semorrison
2024-05-09 00:58:43 +00:00
Leonardo de Moura
99e8270d2d
fix: proposition fields must be theorems (#4006)
closes #2575
2024-04-28 01:59:47 +00:00
Leonardo de Moura
8b2710c8b3 chore: use let_expr to cleanup code 2024-03-02 10:07:15 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
53146db620
fix: zetaDelta := false regression (#3459)
See new test. It is a mwe for an issue blocking Mathlib.
2024-02-22 19:10:02 +00:00
Henrik Böving
23e49eb519 perf: add prelude to all Lean modules 2024-02-18 14:55:17 -08:00
Matthew Robert Ballard
03f344a35f
feat: use supplied structure fields left to right and eta reduce terms in structure instance elaboration (#2478)
Modifies the structure instance elaborator to
1. Fill in missing fields from sources in strict left-to-right order. In
`{a, b with}`, sometimes the elaborator
would ignore `a` even if both `a` and `b` provided the same field,
depending on what subobject fields they had.
2. Use the sources, or subobjects of the sources, to fill in entire
subobjects of the target structure as much as possible.
Currently, a field cannot be filled directly by a source itself
resulting in the term being eta expanded.
This change avoids this unnecessary and surprisingly costly extra eta
expansion.

Adds two new tests to illustrate the performance benefit (one courtesy
@semorrison). These are currently failing on master and succeed on this
branch.

There is one additional test to exercise the changes to the elaboration
of structure instances.

Changes to make mathlib build are in leanprover-community/mathlib4#9843

Closes #2451
2024-02-01 03:42:39 +00:00
int-y1
8d7520b36f chore: fix typos in comments 2023-10-08 10:46:05 +02:00
Alex J Best
8da48f2381 chore: typo fix in error message of overlapping structure fields 2022-11-05 12:41:40 -07:00
Mario Carneiro
583e023314 chore: snake-case attributes (part 2) 2022-10-19 09:28:08 -07:00
Mario Carneiro
85119ba9d1 chore: move Std.* data structures to Lean.* 2022-09-26 05:46:04 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
ef9127487a fix: throw error at {..} notation if constructor is private 2022-09-14 12:05:53 -07:00
Gabriel Ebner
f1b5fa53f0 chore: use new comment syntax 2022-09-14 08:26:17 -07:00
Mario Carneiro
a0fcb660c5 feat: allow multiple source + no expected type 2022-09-13 07:09:08 -07:00
Mario Carneiro
adc215dab9 feat: support {s with ..} 2022-09-13 07:09:08 -07:00
Gabriel Ebner
ca28b0462c feat: show all missing fields in structure instance 2022-09-13 06:19:40 -07:00
Mario Carneiro
014db5d6d0 doc: relocate doc strings from elab to syntax 2022-08-13 17:16:40 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
a63cb24a38 feat: structure field auto-completion 2022-07-30 14:40:21 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
43c787d1c6 feat: synthesize implicit structure fields in the structure instance notation
closes #1305
2022-07-26 13:24:57 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
8335a82aed refactor: improve MVarId method discoverability
See issue #1346
2022-07-24 21:36:33 -07:00
Mario Carneiro
f6211b1a74
chore: convert doc/mod comments from /- to /--//-! (#1354) 2022-07-22 12:05:31 -07:00
Gabriel Ebner
a8cab84735 refactor: use computed fields for Expr 2022-07-11 14:19:41 -07:00
Gabriel Ebner
eba400543d refactor: use computed fields for Name 2022-07-11 14:19:41 -07:00