This PR deprecates `Fin.ofNat` in favour of `Fin.ofNat'` (which takes an
`[NeZero]` instance, rather than returning an element of `Fin (n+1)`).
After leaving the deprecation warning in place for some time, we will
then rename `ofNat'` back to `ofNat`.
This PR uses `Array.findFinIdx?` in preference to `Array.findIdx?` where
it allows converting a runtime bounds check to a compile time bounds
check.
(and some other minor cleanup)
This PR fixes a non-termination bug that occurred when generating the
match-expression equation theorems. The bug was triggered when the proof
automation for the equation theorem repeatedly applied `injection(` to
the same local declaration, as it could not be removed due to forward
dependencies. See issue #6067 for an example that reproduces this issue.
closes#6067
This PR modifies the signature of the functions `Nat.fold`,
`Nat.foldRev`, `Nat.any`, `Nat.all`, so that the function is passed the
upper bound. This allows us to change runtime array bounds checks to
compile time checks in many places.
This PR fixes a non-termination bug that occurred when generating the
match-expression splitter theorem. The bug was triggered when the proof
automation for the splitter theorem repeatedly applied `injection` to
the same local declaration, as it could not be removed due to forward
dependencies. See issue #6065 for an example that reproduces this issue.
closes#6065
This PR avoids runtime array bounds checks in places where it can
trivially be done at compile time.
None of these changes are of particular consequence: I mostly wanted to
learn how much we do this, and what the obstacles are to doing it less.
This PR does the same fix as #6104, but such that it doesn't break the
test/the file in `Plausible`. This is done by not creating unused let
binders in metavariable types that are made by `elimMVar`. (This is also
a positive thing for users looking at metavariable types, for example in
error messages)
We get rid of `skipAtMostNumBinders`. This function was originally
defined for the purpose of making this test work, but it is a hack
because it allows cycles in the metavariable context.
It would make sense to split these changes into 2 PRs, but I combined
them here to show that the combination of them closes#6013 without
breaking anything
Closes#6013
This PR replaces `Array.feraseIdx` and `Array.insertAt` with
`Array.eraseIdx` and `Array.insertIdx`, both of which take a `Nat`
argument and a tactic-provided proof that it is in bounds. We also have
`eraseIdxIfInBounds` and `insertIdxIfInBounds` which are noops if the
index is out of bounds. We also provide a `Fin` valued version of
`Array.findIdx?`. Together, these quite ergonomically improve the array
indexing safety at a number of places in the compiler/elaborator.
This PR fixes a bug at the definitional equality test (`isDefEq`). At
unification constraints of the form `c.{u} =?= c.{v}`, it was not trying
to unfold `c`. This bug did not affect the kernel.
closes#6117
This PR fixes an issue in the `injection` tactic. This tactic may
execute multiple sub-tactics. If any of them fail, we must backtrack the
partial assignment. This issue was causing the error: "`mvarId` is
already assigned" in issue #6066. The issue is not yet resolved, as the
equation generator for the match expressions is failing in the example
provided in this issue.
This PR fixes the caching infrastructure for `whnf` and `isDefEq`,
ensuring the cache accounts for all relevant configuration flags. It
also cleans up the `WHNF.lean` module and improves the configuration of
`whnf`.
This PR modifies `Lean.MVarId.replaceTargetDefEq` and
`Lean.MVarId.replaceLocalDeclDefEq` to use `Expr.equal` instead of
`Expr.eqv` when determining whether the expression has changed. This is
justified on the grounds that binder names and binder infos are
user-visible and affect elaboration.
This PR introduces date and time functionality to the Lean 4 Std.
Breaking Changes:
- `Lean.Data.Rat` is now `Std.Internal.Rat` because it's used by the
DateTime library.
---------
Co-authored-by: Markus Himmel <markus@himmel-villmar.de>
Co-authored-by: Mac Malone <tydeu@hatpress.net>
This PR prepares #6068 by using the `RArray` data structure in
`simp_arith` the simp-arith meta code.
After the subsequent stage0 we can change the simp-arith theorems in
`Init`.
This PR fixes a bug where the monad lift coercion elaborator would
partially unify expressions even if they were not monads. This could be
taken advantage of to propagate information that could help elaboration
make progress, for example the first `change` worked because the monad
lift coercion elaborator was unifying `@Eq _ _` with `@Eq (Nat × Nat)
p`:
```lean
example (p : Nat × Nat) : p = p := by
change _ = ⟨_, _⟩ -- used to work (yielding `p = (p.fst, p.snd)`), now it doesn't
change ⟨_, _⟩ = _ -- never worked
```
As such, this is a breaking change; you may need to adjust expressions
to include additional implicit arguments.
This PR changes the signature of `Array.get` to take a Nat and a proof,
rather than a `Fin`, for consistency with the rest of the (planned)
Array API. Note that because of bootstrapping issues we can't provide
`get_elem_tactic` as an autoparameter for the proof. As users will
mostly use the `xs[i]` notation provided by `GetElem`, this hopefully
isn't a problem.
We may restore `Fin` based versions, either here or downstream, as
needed, but they won't be the "main" functions.
---------
Co-authored-by: David Thrane Christiansen <david@davidchristiansen.dk>
This PR changes the signature of `Array.set` to take a `Nat`, and a
tactic-provided bound, rather than a `Fin`.
Corresponding changes (but without the auto-param) for `Array.get` will
arrive shortly, after which I'll go more pervasively through the Array
API.
This PR removes
- a duplicate `MonadMCtx` instance in `MetavarContext.lean`
- `:= return ←` that I had left there accidentally in a previous PR.
- the unnecessary application of `mapMetaM` in `withTransparency`.
Example: Normally subtype notation pretty prints as `{ x // x > 0 }`,
but now the difference in domains is exposed:
```lean
example (h : {x : Int // x > 0}) : {x : Nat // x > 0} := h
/-
error: type mismatch
h
has type
{ x : Int // x > 0 } : Type
but is expected to have type
{ x : Nat // x > 0 } : Type
-/
```
Example:
```lean
example : 0 = (0 : Nat) := by
exact Eq.refl (0 : Int)
/-
error: type mismatch
Eq.refl 0
has type
(0 : Int) = 0 : Prop
but is expected to have type
(0 : Nat) = 0 : Prop
-/
```
Specializes the congr lemma generated for the `arg` conv tactic to only
rewrite the chosen argument. This makes it much more likely that the
chosen argument is able to be accessed.
Lets `arg` access the domain and codomain of pi types via `arg 1` and
`arg 2` in more situations. Upstreams `pi_congr` for this from mathlib.
Adds a negative indexing option, where `arg -2` accesses the
second-to-last argument for example, making the behavior of `lhs`
available to `arg`. This works for `enter` as well.
Other improvement: when there is an error in the `enter [...]` tactic,
individual locations get underlined with the error. The tactic info now
also is like `rw`, so you can see the intermediate conv states.
Closes#5871
The kernel supports primitive projections for all inductive types with
one construtor. The elaborator was assuming primitive projections only
work for "structure-likes", non-recursive inductive types with no
indices.
Enables numeric projection notation for general one-constructor
inductives.
Extracted from #5783.
Makes `MessageData.ofConstName` available without needing to import the
pretty printer. Any code making use of `MessageData` can write `m!" ...
{.ofConstName n} ... "` to have the name print with hover information.
More error messages now have hover information.
* Now `.ofConstName` also has a boolean flag to make names print fully
qualified. Default: false.
* Now `.ofConstName` will sanitize names that aren't constants. It is OK
to use it in `"unknown constant '{.ofConstName constName}'"` errors.
Usability note: it is more user-friendly to have "has already been
declared" errors report the fully qualified name. For this, write
`m!"{.ofConstName n true} has already been declared"`.
This adds the ability to add the converse direction of a rewrite rule
not just in simp arguments `simp [← thm]`, but also as a global
attribute
```lean
attribute [simp ←] thm
```
This fixes#5828.
This can be undone with `attribute [-simp]`, although note that
`[-simp]` wins and cannot be undone at the moment (#5868).
Like `simp [← thm]` (see #4290), this will do an implicit `attribute
[-simp] thm` if the other direction is already defined.
Type mismatch errors have a nice feature where expressions are annotated
with `pp.explicit` to expose differences via `isDefEq` checking.
However, this procedure has side effects since `isDefEq` may assign
metavariables. This PR wraps the procedure with `withoutModifyingState`
to prevent assignments from escaping.
Assignments can lead to confusing behavior. For example, in the
following a higher-order unification fails, but the difference-finding
procedure unifies metavariables in a naive way, producing a baffling
error message:
```lean
theorem test {f g : Nat → Nat} (n : Nat) (hfg : ∀a, f (g a) = a) :
f (g n) = n := hfg n
example {g2 : ℕ → ℕ} (n2 : ℕ) : (λx => x * 2) (g2 n2) = n2 := by
with_reducible refine test n2 ?_
/-
type mismatch
test n2 ?m.648
has type
(fun x ↦ x * 2) (g2 n2) = n2 : Prop
but is expected to have type
(fun x ↦ x * 2) (g2 n2) = n2 : Prop
-/
```
With the change, it now says `has type ?m.153 (?m.154 n2) = n2`.
Note: this uses `withoutModifyingState` instead of `withNewMCtxDepth`
because we want to know something about where `isDefEq` failed — we are
trying to simulate a very basic version of `isDefEq` for function
applications, and we want the state at the point of failure to know
which argument is "at fault".
This default instance makes it possible to write things like `m!"the
constant is {.ofConstName n}"`.
Breaking change: This weakly causes terms to have a type of
`MessageData` if their type is otherwise unknown. For example:
* `m!"... {x} ..."` can cause `x` to have type `MessageData`, causing
the `let` definition of `x` to fail to elaborate. Fix: give `x` an
explicit type.
* Arithmetic expressions in `m!` strings may need a type ascription. For
example, if the type of `i` is unknown at the time the arithmetic
expression is elaborated, then `m!"... {i + 1} ..."` can fail saying
that it cannot find an `HAdd Nat Nat MessageData` instance. Two fixes:
either ensure that the type of `i` is known, or add a type ascription to
guide the `MessageData` coercion, like `m!"... {(i + 1 : Nat)} ..."`.
Previously `RecursorVal.getInduct` would return the prefix of the
recursor’s name, which is unlikely the right value for the “derived”
recursors in nested recursion. The code using `RecursorVal.getInduct`
seems to expect the name of the inductive type of major argument here.
If we return that name, this fixes#5661.
This bug becomes more visible now that we have structural mutual
recursion.
Also, to avoid confusion, renames the function to ``getMajorInduct`.
This PR simplifies the signature of `Array.mapIdx`, to take a function
`f : Nat \to \a \to \b` rather than a function `f : Fin as.size \to \a
\to \b`.
Lean doesn't actually use the extra generality anywhere (so in fact this
change *simplifies* all the call sites of `Array.mapIdx`, since we no
longer need to throw away the proof).
This change would make the function signature equivalent to
`List.mapIdx`, hence making it easier to write verification lemmas.
We keep the original behaviour as `Array.mapFinIdx`.
It bothered me that inferring instances of the shape `Decidable (∀ (x : Fin _), _)`
will go linearly through all instances of that shape, even those that are
about `∀ (x : Nat), …`. And that `Decidable (∃ (x : Fin _), _)` gets better
indexing than `Decidable (∀ (x : Fin _), _)`.
Judging from code comments, the discr tree used to index arrow types
with two arguments (domain and body), and that led to bugs due to the
dependency, so the arguments were removed. But it seems that indexing
the domain is completely simple and innocent.
So let’s see what happens…
Mostly only insignificant perf improvements, unfortunately (~Mathlib.Data.Matroid.IndepAxioms — instructions -11.4B, overall build instructions -0.097 %):
http://speed.lean-fro.org/mathlib4/compare/dd333cc1-fa26-42f2-96c6-b0e66047d0b6/to/6875ff8f-a17c-431d-8b8b-2f00799be794
This is just a small baby step compared to the more invasive improvements
done in the [`RefinedDiscrTree` by J. W. Gerbscheid](https://leanprover-community.github.io/mathlib4_docs/Mathlib/Tactic/FunProp/RefinedDiscrTree.html) in mathlib.
