Commit graph

1556 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Leonardo de Moura
9204b4cc2f chore: missing specialize 2020-10-12 12:11:17 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
eacdb5ff83 feat: add Range notation 2020-10-12 11:50:13 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
f57201d787 feat: add Repr and HasToString instances for PUnit and ULift 2020-10-12 11:01:59 -07:00
Sebastian Ullrich
8b62665788 chore: print dbg* output to stderr 2020-10-12 10:01:29 +02:00
Leonardo de Moura
7c6b10012b chore: add helper function 2020-10-11 19:58:07 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
8555cbaace fix: export command for new frontend 2020-10-11 19:44:43 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
6a808540d5 chore: remove macro println! 2020-10-09 20:53:44 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
bca81714fe feat: println! and dbgTrace! macros with string interpolation 2020-10-09 17:19:04 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
51dc10dd93 feat: array slicing notation 2020-10-09 16:40:18 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
3bd75d51d5 feat: add ParserDescr.noWs 2020-10-09 16:26:49 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
5a40d9eb13 feat: add Subarray 2020-10-09 16:06:24 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
749e2063cf feat: add interpolated string for toString 2020-10-09 14:38:24 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
7013ea4098 feat: add interpolatedStr to ParserDescr and Syntax 2020-10-09 14:04:53 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
36696d726d feat: add String Interpolation 2020-10-09 13:40:35 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
650bd95ab9 feat: add efficient Array.forIn 2020-10-09 13:07:20 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
7574b9f0ef feat: add coercion Fin => Nat 2020-10-09 12:22:04 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
0b81ffb569 refactor: factor out nested do term support and document code
We currently use the nested `do` terms for two combinators: `catch`
and `finally`. We may want to support more in the future.
2020-10-09 11:59:14 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
8a6cb1842f feat: expand doTry
@Kha I did not implement support for reassignments and `continue`,
`break`, `return` inside the `finally` clause. It is doable, but it
feels like unnecessary complexity. We currently don't have any
instance in our code base where this would be useful.
2020-10-08 19:39:36 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
5b76155318 feat: new return semantics
`return e` is not equivalent to `pure e` anymore.
Now, `return e` means "return value `e` as the result of the root `do` block".
2020-10-07 14:07:58 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
e70dd03340 chore: remove forInMap 2020-10-07 10:01:04 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
98dbe45ab8 chore: remove Monad List instance
@Kha The new `do` notation works for pure code too.
It automatically inserts `Id` if the expected type is not a monad.
This works great when we are not conflating data and control.
After deleting `Monad List`, we will be able to write functions such as
```lean
def mapWhen (p : Nat → Bool) (f : Nat → Nat) (xs : List Nat) : List Nat := do
for x in xs do
  if p x then
    x := f x
```
without adding `Id.run` before the `do`.
2020-10-05 13:27:18 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
5adb04b10e chore: add helper instance 2020-10-05 11:24:35 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
82e11c401d fix: #eval was not capturing dbgTrace! output in pure code
In the following example, the output produced by `dbgTrace!` was not
being captured. It could break the lean server. At least, it broke the lean4-mode.
```lean
def f (x : Nat) : Nat :=
dbgTrace! ">>> " ++ toString x;
x + 1

eval f 10
```

cc @Kha
2020-10-05 10:22:04 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
d7d7e16f96 chore: Id missing instances 2020-10-05 09:55:19 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
b4289d5c5d feat: add DoResult 2020-10-03 15:38:30 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
21d90afa43 feat: add ForInStep type 2020-10-03 15:16:45 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
0911b9bc80 feat: add missing features to do notation parser 2020-09-30 06:51:25 -07:00
Sebastian Ullrich
16c71e6a26 fix: IO.Process.output 2020-09-29 08:01:10 -07:00
Sebastian Ullrich
ab6b6ac3ba feat: add dedicated task priority 2020-09-29 08:01:10 -07:00
Sebastian Ullrich
562c7ed5ce feat: expose task priorities 2020-09-29 08:01:10 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
3f4499be08 feat: allow trailing ; at doSeqBracketed 2020-09-26 14:20:47 -07:00
Sebastian Ullrich
eae32b08a6 fix: pretty printing multiple universe levels
Fixes #190
2020-09-25 20:06:18 +02:00
Leonardo de Moura
98f7e9b3e4 chore: naming convention 2020-09-24 19:22:24 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
550b5d2b47 chore: missing [inline] 2020-09-24 12:40:28 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
c46e64b089 feat: add Array.zipWith and Array.zip 2020-09-23 18:24:56 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
241eabfc41 fix: non termination on ill-formed string literals 2020-09-20 17:05:18 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
f679b7d803 feat: add notFollowedBy to syntax 2020-09-19 15:43:44 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
3e9b2a0b08 feat: add expandMacro? and expandMacros methods to MacroM 2020-09-19 13:02:27 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
7b6d06df0d fix: remove bad instances
They are unnecessary, and were producing a very big search space in a
few examples.
2020-09-17 17:31:09 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
f4aabaecae refactor: move Lean.quote to LeanInit
cc @Kha
2020-09-17 08:15:58 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
18a7f5a489 feat: new name sanitizer 2020-09-16 11:57:55 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
0abca5475f refactor: move ppExpr to IO
@Kha I am also tracking `currNamespace` and `openDecls`.

BTW, I also tried an experiment where I added `currNamespace` and
`openDecls` to `Meta.Context`, but it looked weird. This information
is only needed in the elaborator and pretty printer.
The `PPContext` object should contain everything you need. You
can put `currNamespace` and `openDecls` in the `Delaborator.Context`.
2020-09-15 18:48:21 -07:00
Sebastian Ullrich
a93a53b4b5 feat: more IO Task functions 2020-09-14 17:57:33 +02:00
Sebastian Ullrich
77cbaa752c fix: Task: make reference and -j0 semantics eager, simplify 2020-09-14 17:57:33 +02:00
Sebastian Ullrich
5b83ceb1b5 feat: IO.mapTask, IO.bindTask 2020-09-14 17:57:33 +02:00
Sebastian Ullrich
307a833798 feat: implement IO.asTask as primitive using always-run tasks 2020-09-14 17:57:33 +02:00
Sebastian Ullrich
c672bd657f feat: IO.asTask 2020-09-14 17:57:33 +02:00
Sebastian Ullrich
e14e76775f fix: ensure *println functions are atomic 2020-09-14 17:57:33 +02:00
Leonardo de Moura
ba4fdce508 feat: expand helper macros 2020-09-10 14:25:07 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
34291e2151 feat: add Name.simpMacroScopes
@Kha We currently have a few macros that create binder names
such as `x`. These macros rely on the hygienic framework. This part is
great. Before this commit we were simply erasing the macro
scopes when creating the actual binders at `Expr.lean`.
The result produced expressions that were hard to debug.
For example, consider the following scenario

1- Macro creates a few binder names using ``x <- `(x)``
2- We create a lambda expression `t` with these binder names.
3- Then, we use `lambdaTelescope t fun xs body => ...`
   Now, if we trace `xs` and `body`, we get `#[x, x, ... x]` and
   we can't distinguish the different `x`s in `body`.
   So, it is really hard to debug anything using the traces.

This commit adds `Name.simpMacroScopes` for simplying "macro scoped"
names. Example: given `x._@.Init.Data.List.Basic._hyg.2.5`, it
produces `x.2.5`. I exported this function, and used it in the old
pretty printer.

I have considered modifying `lambdaTelescope` to make sure it creates
unused names. I think this option is bad because it introduces
overhead, and in a few places we want to preserve the binder names.

I have also considered replacing the `let x := x.eraseMacroScopes` at
`Expr.lean` with `let x := x.simpMacroScopes`. I think this option is
bad since we are destroying scoping information and will not be able
to distiguish which variables have macro scopes when processing
tactics.

Anyway, the solution in this commit is good for this week, but we
should discuss a more permanent solution next week.
2020-09-08 18:22:44 -07:00