Makes `MessageData.ofConstName` available without needing to import the
pretty printer. Any code making use of `MessageData` can write `m!" ...
{.ofConstName n} ... "` to have the name print with hover information.
More error messages now have hover information.
* Now `.ofConstName` also has a boolean flag to make names print fully
qualified. Default: false.
* Now `.ofConstName` will sanitize names that aren't constants. It is OK
to use it in `"unknown constant '{.ofConstName constName}'"` errors.
Usability note: it is more user-friendly to have "has already been
declared" errors report the fully qualified name. For this, write
`m!"{.ofConstName n true} has already been declared"`.
Cleanup of #5650
* default `Modifiers.stx` to missing
* rename and clarify `addDeclarationRangesFromSyntax` as the main
convenience function for user metaprograms
- Add support for reserved declaration names. We use them for theorems
generated on demand.
- Equation theorems are not private declarations anymore.
- Generate equation theorems on demand when resolving symbols.
- Prevent users from creating declarations using reserved names. Users
can bypass it using meta-programming.
See next test for examples.
@Kha I marked the corresponding methods as `protected`.
I currently can't stand `throw_error`, and I am optimistic about
server highlighting feature you are working on :)
The `AttrM` monad does not have sufficient information for expanding
macros. So, we expand them eagerly before we invoke the attributer
handlers implemented using `AttrM`.
cc @Kha
@Kha This one required a bunch of manual fixes. The main issue is that
before we added the string interpolation feature, we created
`MessageData`s using `++` and coercions. For example, given
`(e : Expr)`, we would write
```
let msg : MessageData := "type: " ++ e
```
and rely on the coercions `String -> MessageData` and
`Expr -> MessageData`, and the instance `Append MessageData`.
However, heterogeneous operators "block" the expected type propagation downwards.
This kind of code is obsolete now since we can write a more compact
version using string interpolation
```
let msg := m!"type: {e}"
```
`MacroM` will implement `MonadRef` because
1- It will be easier to throw errors from macros
2- We will be able to `getRef` to retrieve the syntax node at macro
rules.
I renamed `Ref` to `MonadRef` to make it consistent with other classes
providing monadic methods (e.g. `MonadEnv`, `MonadState`, etc).
cc @Kha
