This PR adds theorems `Nat.[shiftLeft_or_distrib`,
shiftLeft_xor_distrib`, shiftLeft_and_distrib`, `testBit_mul_two_pow`,
`bitwise_mul_two_pow`, `shiftLeft_bitwise_distrib]`, to prove
`Nat.shiftLeft_or_distrib` by emulating the proof strategy of
`shiftRight_and_distrib`.
In particular, `Nat.shiftLeft_or_distrib` is necessary to simplify the
proofs in #6476.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Keizer <alex@keizer.dev>
This PR defines `Vector.flatMap`, changes the order of arguments in
`List.flatMap` for consistency, and aligns the lemmas for
`List`/`Array`/`Vector` `flatMap`.
This PR completes aligning `List`/`Array`/`Vector` lemmas about
`flatten`. `Vector.flatten` was previously missing, and has been added
(for rectangular sizes only). A small number of missing `Option` lemmas
were also need to get the proofs to go through.
This PR adds lemmas describing the behavior of `UIntX.toBitVec` on
`UIntX` operations.
I did not define them for the `IntX` half yet as that lemma file is non
existent so far and we can start working on `UIntX` in `bv_decide` with
this, then add `IntX` when we grow the `IntX` API.
This PR adds a `toFin` and `msb` lemma for unsigned bitvector modulus.
Similar to #6402, we don't provide a general `toInt_umod` lemmas, but
instead choose to provide more specialized rewrites, with extra
side-conditions.
---------
Co-authored-by: Kim Morrison <scott@tqft.net>
This PR adds a `toFin` and `msb` lemma for unsigned bitvector division.
We *don't* have `toInt_udiv`, since the only truly general statement we
can make does no better than unfolding the definition, and it's not
uncontroversially clear how to unfold `toInt` (see
`toInt_eq_msb_cond`/`toInt_eq_toNat_cond`/`toInt_eq_toNat_bmod` for a
few options currently provided). Instead, we do have `toInt_udiv_of_msb`
that's able to provide a more meaningful rewrite given an extra
side-condition (that `x.msb = false`).
This PR also upstreams a minor `Nat` theorem (`Nat.div_le_div_left`)
needed for the above from Mathlib.
---------
Co-authored-by: Kim Morrison <scott@tqft.net>
This PR proves the basic theorems about the functions `Int.bdiv` and
`Int.bmod`.
For all integers `x` and all natural numbers `m`, we have:
- `Int.bdiv_add_bmod`: `m * bdiv x m + bmod x m = x` (which is stated in
the docstring for docs#Int.bdiv)
- `Int.bmod_add_bdiv`: `bmod x m + m * bdiv x m = x`
- `Int.bdiv_add_bmod'`: `bdiv x m * m + bmod x m = x`
- `Int.bmod_add_bdiv'`: `bmod x m + bdiv x m * m = x`
- `Int.bmod_eq_self_sub_mul_bdiv`: `bmod x m = x - m * bdiv x m`
- `Int.bmod_eq_self_sub_bdiv_mul`: `bmod x m = x - bdiv x m * m`
These theorems are all equivalent to each other by the basic properties
of addition, multiplication, and subtraction of integers.
The names `Int.bdiv_add_bmod`, `Int.bmod_add_bdiv`,
`Int.bdiv_add_bmod'`, and `Int.bmod_add_bdiv'` are meant to parallel the
names of the existing theorems docs#Int.tmod_add_tdiv,
docs#Int.tdiv_add_tmod, docs#Int.tmod_add_tdiv', and
docs#Int.tdiv_add_tmod'.
The names `Int.bmod_eq_self_sub_mul_bdiv` and
`Int.bmod_eq_self_sub_bdiv_mul` follow mathlib's naming conventions.
Note that there is already a theorem called docs#Int.bmod_def, so it
would not have been possible to parallel the name of the existing
theorem docs#Int.tmod_def.
See
https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/217875-Is-there-code-for-X.3F/topic/bdiv.20and.20bmod.
Closes#6493.
This PR ensures that `simp` and `dsimp` do not unfold definitions that
are not intended to be unfolded by the user. See issue #5755 for an
example affected by this issue.
Closes#5755
---------
Co-authored-by: Kim Morrison <kim@tqft.net>
This PR adds basic lemmas about lexicographic order on Array and Vector,
achieving parity with List.
Many lemmas are still missing for all three, particularly about how
order interacts with `++`.
This PR adds lemmas reducing for loops over `Std.Range` to for loops
over `List.range'`.
Equivalent theorems previously existed in Batteries, but the underlying
definitions have changed so these are written from scratch.
This PR replaces `List.lt` with `List.Lex`, from Mathlib, and adds the
new `Bool` valued lexicographic comparatory function `List.lex`. This
subtly changes the definition of `<` on Lists in some situations.
`List.lt` was a weaker relation: in particular if `l₁ < l₂`, then
`a :: l₁ < b :: l₂` may hold according to `List.lt` even if `a` and `b`
are merely incomparable
(either neither `a < b` nor `b < a`), whereas according to `List.Lex`
this would require `a = b`.
When `<` is total, in the sense that `¬ · < ·` is antisymmetric, then
the two relations coincide.
Mathlib was already overriding the order instances for `List α`,
so this change should not be noticed by anyone already using Mathlib.
We simultaneously add the boolean valued `List.lex` function,
parameterised by a `BEq` typeclass
and an arbitrary `lt` function. This will support the flexibility
previously provided for `List.lt`,
via a `==` function which is weaker than strict equality.
This PR ensures that the configuration in `Simp.Config` is used when
reducing terms and checking definitional equality in `simp`.
closes#5455
---------
Co-authored-by: Kim Morrison <kim@tqft.net>
This PR adds lemmas about `Vector.set`, `anyM`, `any`, `allM`, and
`all`.
With these additions, `Vector` is now as in-sync with the `List` API as
`Array` is, and in future I'll be updating both simultaneously.
This PR adds `Nat` theorems for distributing `>>>` over bitwise
operations, paralleling those of `BitVec`.
This enables closing goals like the following using `simp`:
```lean
example (n : Nat) : (n <<< 2 ||| 3) >>> 2 = n := by simp [Nat.shiftRight_or_distrib]
```
It might be nice for these theorems to be `simp` lemmas, but they are
not currently in order to be consistent with the existing `BitVec` and
`div_two` theorems.
This PR adds `BitVec.[toFin|getMsbD]_setWidth` and
`[getMsb|msb]_signExtend` as well as `ofInt_toInt`.
Also correct renamed the misnamed theorem for
`signExtend_eq_setWidth_of_msb_false`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Siddharth <siddu.druid@gmail.com>
