This is "upstreaming" mathlib's `unfold_let` tactic by incorporating its
functionality into `unfold`. Now `unfold` can, in addition to unfolding
global definitions, unfold local definitions. The PR also updates the
`conv` version of the tactic.
An improvement over `unfold_let` is that it beta reduces unfolded local
functions.
Two features not present in `unfold` are that (1) `unfold_let` with no
arguments does zeta delta reduction of *all* local definitions, and also
(2) `unfold_let` can interleave unfoldings (in contrast, `unfold a b c`
is exactly the same as `unfold a; unfold b; unfold c`).
Closes RFC #4090
This is part of #3983.
Fine-grained equational lemmas are useful even for non-recursive
functions, so this adds them.
The new option `eqns.nonrecursive` can be set to `false` to have the old
behavior.
### Breaking channge
This is a breaking change: Previously, `rw [Option.map]` would rewrite
`Option.map f o` to `match o with … `. Now this rewrite will fail
because the equational lemmas require constructors here (like they do
for, say, `List.map`).
Remedies:
* Split on `o` before rewriting.
* Use `rw [Option.map.eq_def]`, which rewrites any (saturated)
application of `Option.map`
* Use `set_option eqns.nonrecursive false` when *defining* the function
in question.
### Interaction with simp
The `simp` tactic so far had a special provision for non-recursive
functions so that `simp [f]` will try to use the equational lemmas, but
will also unfold `f` else, so less breakage here (but maybe performance
improvements with functions with many cases when applied to a
constructor, as the simplifier will no longer unfold to a large
`match`-statement and then collapse it right away).
For projection functions and functions marked `[reducible]`, `simp [f]`
won’t use the equational theorems, and will only use its internal
unfolding machinery.
### Implementation notes
It uses the same `mkEqnTypes` function as for recursive functions, so we
are close to a consistency here. There is still the wrinkle that for
recursive functions we don't split matches without an interesting
recursive call inside. Unifying that is future work.
Fixes typo "reflexivitiy" to "reflexivity", and changes exact Eq.rfl to
exact rfl, since Eq.rfl does not exist.
(I got something confused wrt the bot message on #4367 and accidentally
closed that one, so making this one instead, which I think satisfies the
requirements it wanted.)
---------
Co-authored-by: Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de>
This assigns priorities to the equational lemmas so that more specific
ones
are tried first before a possible catch-all with possible
side-conditions.
We assign very low priorities to match the simplifiers behavior when
unfolding
a definition, which happens in `simpLoop`’ `visitPreContinue` after
applying
rewrite rules.
Definitions with more than 100 equational theorems will use priority 1
for all
but the last (a heuristic, not perfect).
fixes#4173, to some extent.
This makes `exact?%` behave like `by exact?` rather than `by apply?`.
If the underlying function `librarySearch` finds a suggestion which
closes the goal, use it (and add a code action). Otherwise log an error
and use `sorry`. The error is either
```text
`exact?%` didn't find any relevant lemmas
```
or
```text
`exact?%` could not close the goal. Try `by apply` to see partial suggestions.
```
---
[Zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/Useful.20term.20elaborators/near/434863856)
---------
Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <scott.morrison@gmail.com>
This makes changes to the `GetElem` class so that it does not lead to
unnecessary overhead in container like `RBMap`.
The changes are to:
1. Make `getElem?` and `getElem!` part of the `GetElem` class so they
can be overridden in instances.
2. Introduce a `LawfulGetElem` class that contains correctness theorems
for `getElem?` and `getElem!` using the original definitions.
3. Reorganize definitions (e.g, by moving `GetElem` out of
`Init.Prelude`) so that the `GetElem` changes are feasible.
4. Provide `LawfulGetElem` instances to complement all existing
`GetElem` instances in Lean core.
To reduce the size of the PR, this doesn't do the work of providing new
`GetElem` instances for `RBMap`, `HashMap` etc. That will be done in a
separate PR (#3688) that depends on this.
---------
Co-authored-by: Mac Malone <tydeu@hatpress.net>
Previously:
If the `rfl` macro was going to fail, it would:
1. expand to `eq_refl`, which is implemented by
`Lean.Elab.Tactic.evalRefl`, and call `Lean.MVarId.refl` which would:
* either try kernel defeq (if in `.default` or `.all` transparency mode)
* otherwise try `IsDefEq`
* then fail.
2. Next expand to the `apply_rfl` tactic, which is implemented by
`Lean.Elab.Tactic.Rfl.evalApplyRfl`, and call `Lean.MVarId.applyRefl`
which would look for lemmas labelled `@[refl]`, and unfortunately in
Mathlib find `Eq.refl`, so try applying that (resulting in another
`IsDefEq`)
3. Because of an accidental duplication, if `Lean.Elab.Tactic.Rfl` was
imported, it would *again* expand to `apply_rfl`.
Now:
1. Same behaviour in `eq_refl`.
2. The `@[refl]` attribute will reject `Eq.refl`, and `MVarId.applyRefl`
will fail when applied to equality goals.
3. The duplication has been removed.
fixes#3770
Also start `rfl` with a `fail` message that is hopefully more helpful
than what we get now (see updated test output). This would be a cheaper
way to address #3302 without changing the implementation of rfl (as
tried in #3714).
This updates the rw? tactic from Mathlib to use lazy discriminator trees
and upstreams it.
---------
Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <scott.morrison@gmail.com>
with this, hopefully more obvious array accesses will be handled
automatically.
Just like #3503, this PR does not investiate which of the exitsting
tactics in `get_elem_tactic_trivial` are subsumed now and could be
dropped without (too much) breakage.
This is still a draft PR, but includes the core exact? and apply?
tactics.
Still need to convert to builtin syntax and test on Std.
---------
Co-authored-by: David Thrane Christiansen <david@davidchristiansen.dk>
#3408 was somewhat large and didn't properly test the symm and label
attribute code after edits to the builtin versions.
This migrates the code for generating labeled attributes from Init back
to Lean so that the required definitions are in scope.
This also addresses a mistake in the symm elaborator that prevented symm
without location information from elaborating.
Both fixes have been tested on the Std test suite and successfully
passed.
This is a quite substantial tactic.
It also includes the infamour `NatCast` typeclass (which I've equipped
with a module-doc). I wasn't at all sure where that should live, so it
is currently randomly in `Lean/Elan/Tactic/NatCast.lean`: presumably if
we're doing this it will go somewhere in `Init`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Leonardo de Moura <leomoura@amazon.com>
Changes the goal to `False`, retaining as much information as possible:
* If the goal is `False`, do nothing.
* If the goal is an implication or a function type, introduce the
argument and restart.
(In particular, if the goal is `x ≠ y`, introduce `x = y`.)
* Otherwise, for a propositional goal `P`, replace it with `¬ ¬ P`
(attempting to find a `Decidable` instance, but otherwise falling back
to working classically)
and introduce `¬ P`.
* For a non-propositional goal use `False.elim`.
This causes problems when used in conjunction with `#guard_msgs` (which
checks whitespace) and trailing whitespace removal. Discovered by
@PatrickMassot in verbose-lean4.
