This PR reviews the implicitness of arguments across List/Array/Vector,
generally trying to make arguments implicit where possible, although
sometimes correcting propositional arguments which were incorrectly
implicit to explicit.
This PR upstreams `bind_congr` from Mathlib and proves that the minimum
of a sorted list is its head and weakens the antisymmetry condition of
`min?_eq_some_iff`. Instead of requiring an `Std.Antisymm` instance,
`min?_eq_some_iff` now only expects a proof that the relation is
antisymmetric *on the elements of the list*. If the new premise is left
out, an autoparam will try to derive it from `Std.Antisymm`, so existing
usages of the theorem will most likely continue to work.
---------
Co-authored-by: Paul Reichert <6992158+datokrat@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR replaces `List.lt` with `List.Lex`, from Mathlib, and adds the
new `Bool` valued lexicographic comparatory function `List.lex`. This
subtly changes the definition of `<` on Lists in some situations.
`List.lt` was a weaker relation: in particular if `l₁ < l₂`, then
`a :: l₁ < b :: l₂` may hold according to `List.lt` even if `a` and `b`
are merely incomparable
(either neither `a < b` nor `b < a`), whereas according to `List.Lex`
this would require `a = b`.
When `<` is total, in the sense that `¬ · < ·` is antisymmetric, then
the two relations coincide.
Mathlib was already overriding the order instances for `List α`,
so this change should not be noticed by anyone already using Mathlib.
We simultaneously add the boolean valued `List.lex` function,
parameterised by a `BEq` typeclass
and an arbitrary `lt` function. This will support the flexibility
previously provided for `List.lt`,
via a `==` function which is weaker than strict equality.
@kim-em, I'm happy to keep any subset of `foldl_min`, `foldl_min_right`,
`foldl_min_le`, `foldl_min_min_of_le` (should that one have been called
`foldl_min_le_of_le`?). Which ones do you like?
