Commit graph

20 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Kim Morrison
4887eeb77c
chore: remove >6 month old deprecations (#10968) 2025-10-26 10:01:30 +00:00
Henrik Böving
881a131ad3
chore: re-enable tests (#10923) 2025-10-23 08:38:57 +00:00
Rob23oba
fad0e69cc7
fix: make name mangling unambiguous (#10727)
This PR fixes name mangling to be unambiguous / injective by adding `00`
for disambiguation where necessary. Additionally, the inverse function,
`Lean.Name.unmangle` has been added which can be used to unmangle a
mangled identifier. This unmangler has been added to demonstrate the
injectivity but also to allow unmangling identifiers e.g. for debugging
purposes.

Closes #10724
2025-10-23 07:18:07 +00:00
Kim Morrison
2b23afdfab
chore: remove >6 month old deprecations (#10446) 2025-09-22 12:47:11 +00:00
Paul Reichert
98e4b2882f
refactor: migrate to new ranges (#8841)
This PR migrates usages of `Std.Range` to the new polymorphic ranges.

This PR unfortunately increases the transitive imports for
frequently-used parts of `Init` because the ranges now rely on iterators
in order to provide their functionality for types other than `Nat`.
However, iteration over ranges in compiled code is as efficient as
before in the examples I checked. This is because of a special
`IteratorLoop` implementation provided in the PR for this purpose.

There were two issues that were uncovered during migration:

* In `IndPredBelow.lean`, migrating the last remaining range causes
`compilerTest1.lean` to break. I have minimized the issue and came to
the conclusion it's a compiler bug. Therefore, I have not replaced said
old range usage yet (see #9186).
* In `BRecOn.lean`, we are publicly importing the ranges. Making this
import private should theoretically work, but there seems to be a
problem with the module system, causing the build to panic later in
`Init.Data.Grind.Poly` (see #9185).
* In `FuzzyMatching.lean`, inlining fails with the new ranges, which
would have led to significant slowdown. Therefore, I have not migrated
this file either.
2025-07-07 12:41:53 +00:00
Paul Reichert
6e538c35dd
refactor: migrate all usages of old slice notation (#9000)
This PR replaces all usages of `[:]` slice notation in `src` with the
new `[...]` notation in production code, tests and comments. The
underlying implementation of the `Subarray` functions stays the same.

Notation cheat sheet:

* `*...*` is the doubly-unbounded range.
* `*...a` or `*...<a` contains all elements that are less than `a`.
* `*...=a` contains all elements that are less than or equal to `a`.
* `a...*` contains all elements that are greater than or equal to `a`.
* `a...b` or `a...<b` contains all elements that are greater than or
equal to `a` and less than `b`.
* `a...=b` contains all elements that are greater than or equal to `a`
and less than or equal to `b`.
* `a<...*` contains all elements that are greater than `a`.
* `a<...b` or `a<...<b` contains all elements that are greater than `a`
and less than `b`.
* `a<...=b` contains all elements that are greater than `a` and less
than or equal to `b`.

Benchmarks have shown that importing the iterator-backed parts of the
polymorphic slice library in `Init` impacts build performance. This PR
avoids this problem by separating those parts of the library that do not
rely on iterators from those those that do. Whereever the new slice
notation is used, only the iterator-independent files are imported.
2025-06-27 18:52:07 +00:00
Kim Morrison
74ffa1e413
chore: remove the old Lean.Data.HashMap implementation (#7519)
This PR removes `Lean.Data.HashMap` and `HashSet`. These have been
deprecated for 6 months, replaced by `Std.Data.HashMap` and `HashSet`.
2025-03-20 23:49:55 +00:00
Kim Morrison
4dd182c554
chore: remove deprecated aliases for Int.tdiv and Int.tmod (#6322)
This PR removes the deprecated aliases `Int.div := Int.tdiv` and
`Int.mod := Int.tmod`. Later we will rename `Int.ediv` to `Int.div` and
`Int.emod` to `Int.mod`.
2024-12-08 05:19:42 +00:00
Kim Morrison
a826de8a3d
chore: remove duplicated ForIn instances (#5892)
I'd previously added an instance from `ForIn'` to `ForIn`, but this then
caused some non-defeq duplication. It seems fine to just remove the
concrete `ForIn` instances in cases where the `ForIn'` instance exists
too. We can even remove a number of type-specific lemmas in favour of
the general ones.
2024-10-31 07:40:09 +00:00
Kim Morrison
e41e305479 chore: rename Array.data to Array.toList 2024-09-10 15:24:23 +10:00
Joe Hendrix
8f010a6115
fix: liasolver benchmark bug introduced by #3364 (#3372)
This fixes a rounded division/mod bug introduced by the change in
semantics from Int.div to Int.mod in #3364.
2024-02-16 23:39:26 +00:00
Sebastian Ullrich
4cc6057f4a chore: ensure consistent (Unix) encoding for source files 2023-03-10 16:27:56 +01:00
Mario Carneiro
85119ba9d1 chore: move Std.* data structures to Lean.* 2022-09-26 05:46:04 -07:00
Mario Carneiro
ebb5b97d73 chore: move Bootstrap.Data -> Lean.Data 2022-08-31 11:48:57 -07:00
Mario Carneiro
bf89c5a0f5 chore: move Std -> Bootstrap 2022-08-29 01:26:12 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
4568fe755c chore: fix tests 2022-07-02 15:25:06 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
7a1c79043e chore: fix test 2022-05-04 15:34:37 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
e9d85f49e6 chore: remove tryPureCoe?
Based on the discussion at
https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/270676-lean4/topic/for.2C.20unexpected.20need.20for.20type.20ascription/near/269083574
The consensus seemed to be that "auto pure" is more confusing than its worth.
2022-02-03 16:25:24 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
483f32edd8 feat: in pure code, do use assume Id monad at do notation
This feature produced counterintuitive behavior and confused users.
See discussion at #770.

As pointed out by @tydeu, it is not too much work to write `Id.run <|`
before the `do` when we want to use the `do` notation in pure code.

closes #770
2021-12-10 12:55:14 -08:00
Sebastian Ullrich
5869283694 test: new linear solver benchmark by Marc 2021-12-02 17:03:35 +01:00