@kha The runtime folder includes what is needed to link a
standalone Lean program. It is still contains some unnecessary files.
We will be able to remove them after we release Lean4.
Comment from parser.h
This commit makes sure that all declaration parameters must be surrounded with some kind of bracket. (e.g., '()', '{}', '[]').
The goal is to avoid counter-intuitive declarations such as:
example p : false := trivial
def main proof : false := trivial
which would be parsed as
example (p : false) : _ := trivial
def main (proof : false) : _ := trivial
where `_` in both cases is elaborated into `true`. This issue was raised by @gebner in the slack channel.
Remark: we still want implicit delimiters for lambda/pi expressions. That is, we want to write
fun x : t, s
or
fun x, s
instead of
fun (x : t), s
We need this feature for:
1) Defining nonlinear search patterns. Example: (?m <= ?m + 1)
2) Preprocessing recursive equations and support the pattern
refinement approach used in Agda. Example: in Agda, they accept
```
def append {A : Type} : Π (m n : nat), Vec A m -> Vec A n -> Vec A (m + n)
| m n nil ys := ys
| m n (cons m' x xs) ys := cons x (append m' n xs ys)
```
These equations have to be refined. For example, `m` has to be
replaced with `0` (in the first equation), and `succ m'` in the
second. To implement this kind of refinement, we need to convert
the pattern variables (local constants) into metavariables during
elaboration. Then, the unassigned metavariables become local constants
again. This preprocessing step will fix some of the issues on #1594.
To completely fix#1594, we will need yet another preprocessing step
which will implement "complete transition" used in the equation
compiler before we start elim_match.cpp
Summary:
We minimize the number of "'sorry' used warning messages". We also
re-target the error to the main declaration. Example: foo._main ==> foo
We do not report for auxiliary declarations such as "_example" and
"foo.equations._eqn_1"
Get rid of the redundant error message "error : failed" for tactics.
We added "silent failures" in the tactic framework.
We do not store line/col information for tactics nested in notation
declarations. Before this commit, we would have tactics such
as (tactic.save_info line col) nested inside of notation declarations.
@kha, I added autocompletion for ^. I try to elaborate the expression
before ^. using the local context provided by the parser.
The autocompletion only works if the type for the expression before ^. can be
inferred. This is a big limitation because this information cannot be
obtained in many cases. Here are examples that do not work:
meta def proof_for (e : expr) : smt_tactic expr :=
do cc ← to_cc_state, cc^.proof_for e
--^ does not work here
If we annotate cc with its type, it works:
meta def proof_for (e : expr) : smt_tactic expr :=
do cc : cc_state ← to_cc_state, cc^.proof_for e
--^ works
We don't have typing information on the equation lhs at
autocompletion time. So, the following will not work
private meta def mk_smt_goals_for (cfg : smt_config)
: list expr → list smt_goal → list expr → tactic (list smt_goal × list expr)
| [] sr tr := return (sr^.reverse, tr^.reverse)
--^ does not work since
| (tg::tgs) sr tr := ...