This PR implements two rules for bv_decide's preprocessor, lowering
`|||` to `&&&` in order to enable more term sharing + application of
rules about `&&&` as well as rewrites of the form `(a &&& b == -1#w) =
(a == -1#w && b == -1#w)` in order to preserve rewriting behavior that
already existed before this lowering.
This PR enables code generation to proceed in parallel to further
elaboration.
It does not aim to make further refinements such as generating code for
different declarations in parallel or removing the dependency on kernel
checking.
previously we did not include the “old” IH in the local context, so that
creating a MVar would not pick it up. But this always felt like a hack,
and prevented us from inferring types. So lets's try keeping them in the
context and using `withErasedFVars` only when creating metavariables.
This PR adds a `recommended_spelling` command, which can be used for
recording the recommended spelling of a notation (for example, that the
recommended spelling of `∧` in identifiers is `and`). This information
is then appended to the relevant docstrings for easy lookup.
The function `Lean.Elab.Term.Doc.allRecommendedSpellings` may be used to
obtain a list of all recommended spellings, for example to create a
table that is part of a style guide. In the future, it might be
desirable to be able to partition such a table into smaller tables by
category. This can be added in a future PR.
The implementation is heavily inspired by #4490.
This PR changes how the unfold theorems for well-founded recursion are
created. They are created eagerly (anticipating that the behaivor may be
affected by simp sets soon), and without the detour of going through
equational theorems.
This PR adds a builtin tactic and a builtin attribute that are required
for the tree map. The tactic, `as_aux_lemma`, can generally be used to
wrap the proof term generated by a tactic sequence into a separate
auxiliary lemma in order to keep the proof term small. This can, in rare
cases, be necessary if the proof term will appear multiple times in the
encompassing term. The new attribute, `Std.Internal.tree_tac`, is
internal and should not be used outside of `Std`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Paul Reichert <6992158+datokrat@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR changes how app unexpanders are invoked. Before the ref was
`.missing`, but now the ref is the head constant's delaborated syntax.
This way, when `pp.tagAppFns` is true, then tokens in app unexpanders
are annotated with the head constant. The consequence is that in docgen,
tokens will be linkified. This new behavior is consistent with how
`notation` defines app unexpanders.
In a followup PR we can slightly simplify the `notation` unexpander
macro to not set the ref.
This PR makes the pretty printer for `.coeFun`-tagged functions respect
`pp.tagAppFns`. The effect is that in docgen, when an expression pretty
prints as `f x y z` with `f` a coerced function, then if `f` is a
constant it will be linkified.
This PR modifies the delaborator so that in `pp.tagAppFns` mode,
generalized field notation is tagged with the head constant. The effect
is that docgen documentation will linkify dot notation. Internal change:
now formatted `rawIdent` can be tagged.
This PR adds the `try?` tactic. This is the first draft, but it can
already solve examples such as:
```lean
example (e : Expr) : e.simplify.eval σ = e.eval σ := by
try?
```
in `grind_constProp.lean`. In the example above, it suggests:
```lean
induction e using Expr.simplify.induct <;> grind?
```
In the same test file, we have
```lean
example (σ₁ σ₂ : State) : σ₁.join σ₂ ≼ σ₂ := by
try?
```
and the following suggestion is produced
```lean
induction σ₁, σ₂ using State.join.induct <;> grind?
```
This PR adds the `grind` configuration option `verbose`. For example,
`grind -verbose` disables all diagnostics. We are going to use this flag
to implement `try?`.
This PR changes the `simpMatch` function, used inside the equation
generator for WF-rec functions, to not do eta-expansion.
This makes the process a bit more robust and disciplined, and avoids
removing match-statements (and introduce projections and dependencies)
that we'd rather split instead.
Also adds more tracing to the equational theorem generator.
Extracted from #6898.
This PR adds the new attributes `[grind =>]` and `[grind <=]` for
controlling pattern selection and minimizing the number of places where
we have to use verbose `grind_pattern` command. It also fixes a bug in
the new pattern selection procedure, and improves the automatic pattern
selection for local lemmas.
The tests `grind_constProp.lean` and `no_grind_constProp.lean` are the
same use case with and without `grind`.
This PR fixes a few `grind` issues exposed by the `grind_constProp.lean`
test.
- Support for equational theorem hypotheses created before invoking
`grind`. Example: applying an induction principle.s
- Support of `Unit`-like types.
- Missing recursion depth checks.
This PR fixes a bug in the pattern selection heuristic used in `grind`.
It was unfolding definitions/abstractions that were not supposed to be
unfolded. See `grind_constProp.lean` for examples affected by this bug.
This PR allows environment extensions to opt into access modes that do
not block on the entire environment up to this point as a necessary
prerequisite for parallel proof elaboration.
This PR adds Float32 to the LCNF builtinRuntimeTypes list. This was
missed during the initial Float32 implementation, but this omission has
the side effect of lowering Float32 to obj in the IR.
This PR changes how WF.Eqns unfolds the fixpoint. Instead of delta'ing
until we have `fix`, and then blindly applying `fix_eq`, we delta one
step less and preserve the function on the right hand side. This leads
to smaller terms in the next step, so easier to debug, possibly faster,
possibly more robust.
This PR makes `take`/`drop`/`extract` available for each of
`List`/`Array`/`Vector`. The simp normal forms differ, however: in
`List`, we simplify `extract` to `take+drop`, while in `Array` and
`Vector` we simplify `take` and `drop` to `extract`. We also provide
`Array/Vector.shrink`, which simplifies to `take`, but is implemented by
repeatedly popping. Verification lemmas for `Array/Vector.extract` to
follow in a subsequent PR.
This PR makes the signatures of `find` functions across
`List`/`Array`/`Vector` consistent. Verification lemmas will follow in
subsequent PRs.
We were previously quite inconsistent about the signature of
`indexOf`/`findIdx` functions across `List` and `Array`. Moreover, there
are still quite large gaps in the verification lemma coverage for these
even at the `List` level.
My intention is to make the signatures consistent by providing:
`findIdx` / `findIdx?` / `findFinIdx?` (these all take a predicate, and
return respectively a `Nat`, `Option Nat`, `Option (Fin l.length)`) and
similarly `idxOf` / `idxOf?` / `finIdxOf?` (which look for an element)
for each of List/Array/Vector. I've seen enough examples by now where
each variant is genuinely the most convenient at the call-site, so I'm
going to accept the cost of having many closely related functions.
*Hopefully* for the verification lemmas we can simp all of these into
"projections" of the `Option (Fin l.length)` versions, and then only
have to specify that.
However, I will not plan on immediately either filling in the missing
verification lemmas (or even deciding what the simp normal forms
relating these operations are), and just reach parity amongst
List/Array/Vector for what is already there.
This PR adds a convenience for inductive predicates in `grind`. Now,
give an inductive predicate `C`, `grind [C]` marks `C` terms as
case-split candidates **and** `C` constructors as E-matching theorems.
Here is an example:
```lean
example {B S T s t} (hcond : B s) : (ifThenElse B S T, s) ==> t → (S, s) ==> t := by
grind [BigStep]
```
Users can still use `grind [cases BigStep]` to only mark `C` as a case
split candidate.
This PR fixes#6789 by ensuring metadata generated for inaccessible
variables in pattern-matches is consumed in `casesOnStuckLHS`
accordingly.
Closes#6789
This PR ensures `grind` can use constructors and axioms for heuristic
instantiation based on E-matching. It also allows patterns without
pattern variables for theorems such as `theorem evenz : Even 0`.
This PR adds "performance" counters (e.g., number of instances per
theorem) to `grind`. The counters are always reported on failures, and
on successes when `set_option diagnostics true`.
This PR uniformizes the naming of `enum`/`enumFrom` (on `List`) and
`zipWithIndex` (on `Array` on `Vector`), replacing all with `zipIdx`. At
the same time, we generalize to add an optional `Nat` parameter for the
initial value of the index (which previously existed, only for `List`,
as the separate function `enumFrom`).
This PR adds a few builtin case-splits for `grind`. They are similar to
builtin `simp` theorems. They reduce the noise in the tactics produced
by `grind?`.
This PR fixes a significant auto-completion performance regression that
was introduced in #5666, i.e. v4.14.0.
#5666 introduced tactic docstrings, which were attempted to be collected
for every single completion item. This is slow for hundreds of thousands
of completion items. To fix this, this PR moves the docstring
computation into the completion item resolution, which is only called
when users select a specific completion item in the UI.
A downside of this approach is that we currently can't test completion
item resolution, so we lose a few tests that cover docstrings in
completions in this PR.
