Since https://github.com/curl/curl/pull/4465 curl adheres to the
`Retry-After` header, so maybe this fixes the issues with
```
jq: error (at <stdin>:5): Cannot index string with string "body"
```
that sometimes make this workflow fail.
this job sometimes fails, maybe a race condition with the `gh run
cancel` not happenign quickly enough. Maybe more verbose output will
help understand this better.
Previously, the CI would run upon every label addition, including things
like `builds-mathlib`
or `will-merge-soon`, possibly triggering a new PR release, new mathlib
builds etc. Very wasteful!
Unfortunately (but not surprisingly) Github does not offer a nice way of
saying
“this workflow depends on that label, please re-run if changed”. Not
enough
functional programmer or nix enthusiasts there, I guess…
So here is the next iteration trying to work with what we have from
Github:
A new workflow watches for (only) `full-ci` label addition or deletion,
and then re-runs
the CI job for the current PR.
Sounds simple? But remember, this is github!
* `github.event.pull_request.labels.*.name` is *not* updated when a job
is re-run.
(This is actually a reasonable step towards determinism, but doesn't
help us
constructing this work-around.)
Ok, so let’s use the API to fetch the current state of the label.
* There is no good way to say “find the latest run of workflow `"CI"` on
PR `$n`”.
The best approximation seems to search by branch and triggering event.
This can
probably go wrong if there are multiple PRs from different repos with
the same
head ref name (`patch-1` anyone?). Let’s hope that it doesn’t happen too
often.
* You cannot just rerun a workflow. You can only rerun a finished
workflow. So cancel
it first. And `sleep` a bit…
So let’s see how well this will work. It’s plausibly an improvement.
https://live.lean-lang.org/#project=lean-nightly now allows users to
play around with the latest lean nightly, and it seems prudent to ask
them to test bug reports, if possible, there, and not just with whatever
release they use.
Also reformatted the descriptions to look well in a text area. Users
will not see this as rendered markdown, but as plain text.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Ullrich <sebasti@nullri.ch>
