This PR adds basic lemmas about lexicographic order on Array and Vector,
achieving parity with List.
Many lemmas are still missing for all three, particularly about how
order interacts with `++`.
This PR replaces `List.lt` with `List.Lex`, from Mathlib, and adds the
new `Bool` valued lexicographic comparatory function `List.lex`. This
subtly changes the definition of `<` on Lists in some situations.
`List.lt` was a weaker relation: in particular if `l₁ < l₂`, then
`a :: l₁ < b :: l₂` may hold according to `List.lt` even if `a` and `b`
are merely incomparable
(either neither `a < b` nor `b < a`), whereas according to `List.Lex`
this would require `a = b`.
When `<` is total, in the sense that `¬ · < ·` is antisymmetric, then
the two relations coincide.
Mathlib was already overriding the order instances for `List α`,
so this change should not be noticed by anyone already using Mathlib.
We simultaneously add the boolean valued `List.lex` function,
parameterised by a `BEq` typeclass
and an arbitrary `lt` function. This will support the flexibility
previously provided for `List.lt`,
via a `==` function which is weaker than strict equality.
This PR ensures that the configuration in `Simp.Config` is used when
reducing terms and checking definitional equality in `simp`.
closes#5455
---------
Co-authored-by: Kim Morrison <kim@tqft.net>
This PR adds lemmas about `Vector.set`, `anyM`, `any`, `allM`, and
`all`.
With these additions, `Vector` is now as in-sync with the `List` API as
`Array` is, and in future I'll be updating both simultaneously.
This PR changes the signature of `Array.swap`, so it takes `Nat`
arguments with tactic provided bounds checking. It also renames
`Array.swap!` to `Array.swapIfInBounds`.
This PR modifies the signature of the functions `Nat.fold`,
`Nat.foldRev`, `Nat.any`, `Nat.all`, so that the function is passed the
upper bound. This allows us to change runtime array bounds checks to
compile time checks in many places.
This PR replaces `Array.feraseIdx` and `Array.insertAt` with
`Array.eraseIdx` and `Array.insertIdx`, both of which take a `Nat`
argument and a tactic-provided proof that it is in bounds. We also have
`eraseIdxIfInBounds` and `insertIdxIfInBounds` which are noops if the
index is out of bounds. We also provide a `Fin` valued version of
`Array.findIdx?`. Together, these quite ergonomically improve the array
indexing safety at a number of places in the compiler/elaborator.
This PR modifies the order of arguments for higher-order `Array`
functions, preferring to put the `Array` last (besides positional
arguments with defaults). This is more consistent with the `List` API,
and is more flexible, as dot notation allows two different partially
applied versions.
This PR changes the signature of `Array.get` to take a Nat and a proof,
rather than a `Fin`, for consistency with the rest of the (planned)
Array API. Note that because of bootstrapping issues we can't provide
`get_elem_tactic` as an autoparameter for the proof. As users will
mostly use the `xs[i]` notation provided by `GetElem`, this hopefully
isn't a problem.
We may restore `Fin` based versions, either here or downstream, as
needed, but they won't be the "main" functions.
---------
Co-authored-by: David Thrane Christiansen <david@davidchristiansen.dk>
This PR changes the signature of `Array.set` to take a `Nat`, and a
tactic-provided bound, rather than a `Fin`.
Corresponding changes (but without the auto-param) for `Array.get` will
arrive shortly, after which I'll go more pervasively through the Array
API.
I'd previously added an instance from `ForIn'` to `ForIn`, but this then
caused some non-defeq duplication. It seems fine to just remove the
concrete `ForIn` instances in cases where the `ForIn'` instance exists
too. We can even remove a number of type-specific lemmas in favour of
the general ones.
This PR simplifies the signature of `Array.mapIdx`, to take a function
`f : Nat \to \a \to \b` rather than a function `f : Fin as.size \to \a
\to \b`.
Lean doesn't actually use the extra generality anywhere (so in fact this
change *simplifies* all the call sites of `Array.mapIdx`, since we no
longer need to throw away the proof).
This change would make the function signature equivalent to
`List.mapIdx`, hence making it easier to write verification lemmas.
We keep the original behaviour as `Array.mapFinIdx`.
I made a few choices so far that can probably be discussed:
- got rid of `modn` on `UInt`, nobody seems to use it apart from the
definition of `shift` which can use normal `mod`
- removed the previous defeq optimized definition of `USize.size` in
favor for a normal one. The motivation was to allow `OfNat` to work
which doesn't seem to be necessary anymore afaict.
- Minimized uses of `.val`, should we maybe mark it deprecated?
- Mostly got rid of `.val` in basically all theorems as the proper next
level of API would now be `.toBitVec`. We could probably re-prove them
but it would be more annoying given the change of definition.
- Did not yet redefine `log2` in terms of `BitVec` as this would require
a `log2` in `BitVec` as well, do we want this?
- I added a couple of theorems around the relation of `<` on `UInt` and
`Nat`. These were previously not needed because defeq was used all over
the place to save us. I did not yet generalize these to all types as I
wasn't sure if they are the appropriate lemma that we want to have.
Just an `Array` version of `List.eraseReps`. These functions are for now
outside of scope for verification, so there's just a simple `example` in
the tests.
Previously, it was not possible to use `decide` with most Array
functions (including `==`).
Later, we may replace some of these functions with defeqs that go via
the `List` operations, and use `csimp` lemmas for fast runtime
behaviour. In the meantime, this allows using `decide`.
This is part 2 of 2 of #4801 (which closes#4654). That PR was split in
two to allow a stage0 update between declaring the `usize` functions and
using them where they are needed.
Add efficient `usize` functions for `Array`, `ByteArray`, `FloatArray`.
This is part 1 of 2 since there is a need to update stage0 between the
two parts. (See discussion below.)
Closes#4654
We recently discovered inconsistencies in Mathlib and Std over the
ordering of the arguments for `==`.
The most common usage puts the "more variable" term on the LHS, and the
"more constant" term on the RHS, however there are plenty of exceptions,
and they cause unnecessary pain when switching (particularly, sometimes
requiring otherwise unneeded `LawfulBEq` hypotheses).
This convention is consistent with the (obvious) preference for `x == 0`
over `0 == x` when one term is a literal.
We recently updated Std to use this convention
https://github.com/leanprover/std4/pull/430
This PR changes the two major places in Lean that use the opposite
convention, and adds a suggestion to the docstring for `BEq` about the
preferred convention.
otherwise it remains in the equational theorem and may cause the
“unused have linter” to trigger. By moving the proof into
`decreasing_by`, the equational theorems are unencumbered by termination
arguments.
see also
https://github.com/leanprover/std4/pull/690#issuecomment-2095378609
This PR upstreams lemmas about List/Array operations already defined in
Lean from std/batteries.
Happy to take suggestions about increasing or decreasing scope.
---------
Co-authored-by: Mario Carneiro <di.gama@gmail.com>
Because of the last-added-tried-first rule for macros, all the special
purpose `decreasing_trivial` rules are tried for most recursive
definitions out there, and because they use `apply` and `assumption`
with default transparency may cause some definitoins to be unfolded over
and over again.
A quick test with one of the functions in the leansat project shows that
elaboration time goes down from 600ms to 375ms when using
```
decreasing_by all_goals decreasing_with with_reducible decreasing_trivial
```
instead of
```
decreasing_by all_goals decreasing_with decreasing_trivial
```
This change uses `with_reducible` in most of these macros.
This means that these tactics will no longer work when the
relations/definitions they look for is hidden behind a definition.
This affected in particular `Array.sizeOf_get`, which now has a
companion `sizeOf_getElem`.
In addition, there were three tactics using `apply` to apply Nat-related
lemmas
that we now expect `omega` to solve. We still need them when building
`Init` modules
that don’t have access to `omega`, but they now live in
`decreasing_trivial_pre_omega`,
meant to be only used internally.
