This PR changes the signature of `Array.get` to take a Nat and a proof,
rather than a `Fin`, for consistency with the rest of the (planned)
Array API. Note that because of bootstrapping issues we can't provide
`get_elem_tactic` as an autoparameter for the proof. As users will
mostly use the `xs[i]` notation provided by `GetElem`, this hopefully
isn't a problem.
We may restore `Fin` based versions, either here or downstream, as
needed, but they won't be the "main" functions.
---------
Co-authored-by: David Thrane Christiansen <david@davidchristiansen.dk>
We swap the arguments for `Membership.mem` so that when proceeded by a
`SetLike` coercion, as is often the case in Mathlib, the resulting
expression is recognized as eta expanded and reduce for many
computations. The most beneficial outcome is that the discrimination
tree keys for instances and simp lemmas concerning subsets become more
robust resulting in more efficient searches.
Closes `RFC` #4932
---------
Co-authored-by: Kim Morrison <kim@tqft.net>
Co-authored-by: Henrik Böving <hargonix@gmail.com>
Using `Nat.lt_trans` is too restrictive, and using `Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le`
should make this tactic prove more goals.
This fixes a regression probably introduced by #3991; at least in some
cases before that `apply sizeOf_get` would have solved the goal here.
And it’s true that this is now subsumed by `simp`, but because of the
order that `macro_rules` are tried, the too restrictive variant with
`Nat.lt_trans` would be tried before `simp`, without backtracking.
Fixes#5027
Because of the last-added-tried-first rule for macros, all the special
purpose `decreasing_trivial` rules are tried for most recursive
definitions out there, and because they use `apply` and `assumption`
with default transparency may cause some definitoins to be unfolded over
and over again.
A quick test with one of the functions in the leansat project shows that
elaboration time goes down from 600ms to 375ms when using
```
decreasing_by all_goals decreasing_with with_reducible decreasing_trivial
```
instead of
```
decreasing_by all_goals decreasing_with decreasing_trivial
```
This change uses `with_reducible` in most of these macros.
This means that these tactics will no longer work when the
relations/definitions they look for is hidden behind a definition.
This affected in particular `Array.sizeOf_get`, which now has a
companion `sizeOf_getElem`.
In addition, there were three tactics using `apply` to apply Nat-related
lemmas
that we now expect `omega` to solve. We still need them when building
`Init` modules
that don’t have access to `omega`, but they now live in
`decreasing_trivial_pre_omega`,
meant to be only used internally.
The notation `a ∈ as` for Arrays was previously only defined with
`DecidableEq` on the elements, for (apparently) no good reason. This
drops this requirements (by using `a ∈ as.data`), and simplifies a bunch
of proofs by simply lifting the corresponding proof from lists.
Also, `sizeOf_lt_of_mem` was defined, but not set up to be picked up by
`decreasing_trivial` in the same way that the corresponding List lemma
was set up, so this adds the tactic setup.
The definition for `a ∈ as` is intentionally not defeq to `a ∈ as.data`
so that the termination tactics for Arrays don’t spuriously apply when
recursing through lists.
