Remove transformations such as
```
prod.cases_on M (\fun a b, t)
```
==>
```
let a := M.0 in
let b := M.1 in
t
```
We will perform this kind of transformation in a later stage.
Motivation: explicit control flow graph
TODO: disabled `split_entries` for now.
I believe the new feature exposed a bug at `move_to_entries`.
I will fix this new issue in another commit.
We were getting assertion violations when compiling corelib in debug
mode. There were two problems:
1- We were not capturing free variables occurring in types.
2- A paremeter could depend on a free variable associated with a let-declaration.
This transformation is useful for caching the construction of closures
at runtime. For example, consider the following piece of code
```
λ α a,
@tree.cases_on a visit._main._lambda_1
(λ a_a a_a_1 a_a_2,
let _x_1 := visit._main ◾ a_a,
_x_2 := visit._main._lambda_5 a_a_1 a_a_2
in bind._main ◾◾◾◾ _x_1 _x_2)
```
where `visit._main._lambda_1` is of the form
```
visit._main._lambda_1 :=
λ _x, ...
```
At runtime, we will create a closure object for `visit._main._lambda_1`
since it has arity 1, but no arguments have been provided.
This commit implements a new transformation that creates an auxiliary
declaration with arity 0.
```
visit._main._closed_1 :=
visit._main._lambda_1
```
Its value is cached by the runtime. That is, the closure is created only
once.
@kha This optimizations reduces the number of closures by another 200k
at `parser1.lean`. We are now under 2million :)
`uint32` is a definition, and `type_checker::whnf` unfolds it.
To preserve the information at `erase_irrelevant`, we use a custom
`whnf_type` method that stops reduction as soon as a builtin runtime
type is found.
We must make sure we do not accidentally change the arity of a join
point. The arity is the number of nested lambda expressions.
For example, suppose we have
```
let jp := fun (x : unit), t
```
where `jp` is a join point of arity 1, i.e., `t` is not a lambda.
All "jumps" will be of the form: `jp ()`.
Now, suppose we simplify `t` and it becomes a lambda `fun (y : nat), y`.
We should to represent `jp` as
```
let jp := fun (x : unit) (y : nat), y
```
Because we would be changing `jp`'s arity.
We have the same problem with `cases_on` applications in LCNF.
So, we fix the problem using the same approach: an auxiliary
`let`-declaration. The simplified join point above is encoded as
```
let jp := fun (x : unit),
let _z := fun (y : nat), y
in _z
```
cc @kha This is the bug that I mentioned on slack :)
