Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Leonardo de Moura
91e1d30cf8 feat(frontends/lean/builtin_exprs): use ; in do-notation 2019-06-27 18:00:43 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
ab487ea4ac feat(frontends/lean): allow ; instead of in in let-decls 2019-06-27 17:12:03 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
af2d6dbd45 chore(library/init): avoid local attribute 2019-06-24 15:48:11 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
83e4c63d27 feat(library/init/data/persistentarray/basic): add PersistentArray.modify 2019-06-04 10:40:46 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
30a6a2ade8 feat(library/init/data, runtime): remove parray support from runtime, and implement them in Lean using Scala/Clojure Radix trees
The Scala/Clojure approach for persistent arrays works great with our
`reset/reuse`. We seem to be much more efficient than their
implementations because of `reset/reuse`. The new approach also seems
better than the old one implemented in the runtime, and has a few
advantages:
1- The reroot procedure used in the old approach required
synchronization for multi-threaded code, or we would need to perform
deep copies when sending `parray` objects between threads.
2- We don't need any runtime extension for the new approach.
3- The old approach used "trail lists" for undoing array updates.
This works well for bactracking search use cases, but it is bad
in use cases where we are simultaneously updating the persistent
arrays that have shared nodes.
2019-06-02 09:18:19 -07:00