This PR redefines `String` to be the type of byte arrays `b` for which
`b.IsValidUtf8`.
This moves the data model of strings much closer to the actual data
representation at runtime.
In the near future, we will
- provide variants of `String.Pos` and `Substring` that only allow for
valid positions
- redefine all `String` functions to be much closer to their C++
implementations
In the near-to-medium future we will then provide comprehensive
verification of `String` based on these refactors.
This PR fixes a few bugs in the `rw` tactic: it could "steal" goals
because they appear in the type of the rewrite, it did not do an occurs
check, and new proof goals would not be synthetic opaque. This PR also
lets the `rfl` tactic assign synthetic opaque metavariables so that it
is equivalent to `exact rfl`.
Implementation note: filtering old vs new is not sufficient. This PR
partially addresses the bug where the rw tactic creates natural
metavariables for each of the goals; now new proof goals are synthetic
opaque.
Metaprogramming API: Instead of `Lean.MVarId.rewrite` prefer
`Lean.Elab.Tactic.elabRewrite` for elaborating rewrite theorems and
applying rewrites to expressions.
Closes#10172
This PR is followup to the change in grind pattern heuristics from
#10342, typically resolving the discrepancy by writing out an explicit
`grind_pattern` for the intended pattern. The new behaviour is more
aggressive, because it selects smaller patterns.
This PR completes the review of `@[grind]` annotations without a sigil
(e.g. `=` or `←`), replacing most of them with more specific annotations
or patterns.
---------
Co-authored-by: Leonardo de Moura <leomoura@amazon.com>
This PR updates `@[grind]` annotations which should be `@[grind =]`, for
robustness (and, presumably, in some fraction of cases the existing
heuristic for `@[grind]` is already too liberal).
This PR removes `grind →` annotations that fire too often, unhelpfully.
It would be nice for `grind` to instantiate these lemmas, but only if
they already see `xs ++ ys` and `#[]` in the same equivalence class, not
just as soon as it sees `xs ++ ys`.
In the meantime, let's see what is using these.
This PR adds useful declarations to the `LawfulOrderMin/Max` and
`LawfulOrderLeftLeaningMin/Max` API. In particular, it introduces
`.leftLeaningOfLE` factories for `Min` and `Max`. It also renames
`LawfulOrderMin/Max.of_le` to .of_le_min_iff` and `.of_max_le_iff` and
introduces a second variant with different arguments.
This PR makes `IsPreorder`, `IsPartialOrder`, `IsLinearPreorder` and
`IsLinearOrder` extend `BEq` and `Ord` as appropriate, adds the
`LawfulOrderBEq` and `LawfulOrderOrd` typeclasses relating `BEq` and
`Ord` to `LE`, and adds many lemmas and instances.
Note: This PR contains a refactoring where `Init.Data.Ord` is moved to
`Init.Data.Ord.Basic`. If I added `Init.Data.Ord` simply importing all
submodules, git would not be able to determine that `Init.Data.Ord` was
renamed to `Init.Data.Ord.Basic`. This could lead to unnecessary merge
conflicts in the future. Hence, I chose the name `Init.Data.OrdRoot`
instead of `Init.Data.Ord` temporarily. After this PR, I will rename
this module back to `Init.Data.Ord` in a separate PR.
(This is a copy of #9430: I will not touch that PR because it currently
allows to debug a CI problem and pushing commits might break the
reproducibility.)
This PR eliminates uses of `intros x y z` (with arguments) and updates
the `intros` docstring to suggest that `intro x y z` should be used
instead. The `intros` tactic is historical, and can be traced all the
way back to Lean 2, when `intro` could only introduce a single
hypothesis. Since 2020, the `intro` tactic has superceded it. The
`intros` tactic (without arguments) is currently still useful.
This PR allows most of the `List.lookup` lemmas to be used when
`LawfulBEq α` is not available.
`LawfulBEq` is very strong. Most of the lemmas don't actually require it
-- some only require `ReflBEq`, and only `List.lookup_eq_some_iff`
actually requires `LawfulBEq`.
This PR moves `List.range'_elim` to `List.eq_of_range'_eq_append_cons`
and adds a couple of `grind` annotations for `List.range'`. This will
make it more convenient to work with proof obligations produced by
`mvcgen`.
This PR introduces a canonical way to endow a type with an order
structure. The basic operations (`LE`, `LT`, `Min`, `Max`, and in later
PRs `BEq`, `Ord`, ...) and any higher-level property (a preorder, a
partial order, a linear order etc.) are then put in relation to `LE` as
necessary. The PR provides `IsLinearOrder` instances for many core types
and updates the signatures of some lemmas.
**BREAKING CHANGES:**
* The requirements of the `lt_of_le_of_lt`/`le_trans` lemmas for
`Vector`, `List` and `Array` are simplified. They now require an
`IsLinearOrder` instance. The new requirements are logically equivalent
to the old ones, but the `IsLinearOrder` instance is not automatically
inferred from the smaller typeclasses.
* Hypotheses of type `Std.Total (¬ · < · : α → α → Prop)` are replaced
with the equivalent class `Std.Asymm (· < · : α → α → Prop)`. Breakage
should be limited because there is now an instance that derives the
latter from the former.
* In `Init.Data.List.MinMax`, multiple theorem signatures are modified,
replacing explicit parameters for antisymmetry, totality, `min_ex_or`
etc. with corresponding instance parameters.
This PR addresses an outstanding feature in the module system to
automatically mark `let rec` and `where` helper declarations as private
unless they are defined in a public context such as under `@[expose]`.
This PR adds the separate directions of
`List.pairwise_iff_forall_sublist` as named lemmas.
I want to explore how they could/should be used by `grind` in Mathlib.
(Almost) only typos in constant names and doc-strings were considered;
grammar was not considered. Also, along others,
`mkDefinitionValInferrringUnsafe` has been fixed :-)
This PR makes cdot function expansion take hygiene information into
account, fixing "parenthesis capturing" errors that can make erroneous
cdots trigger cdot expansion in conjunction with macros. For example,
given
```lean
macro "baz% " t:term : term => `(1 + ($t))
```
it used to be that `baz% ·` would expand to `1 + fun x => x`, but now
the parentheses in `($t)` do not capture the cdot. We also fix an
oversight where cdot function expansion ignored the fact that type
ascriptions and tuples were supposed to delimit expansion, and also now
the quotation prechecker ignores the identifier in `hygieneInfo`. (#9491
added the hygiene information to the parenthesis and cdot syntaxes.)
This fixes a bug discovered by [Google
DeepMind](https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/DeepMind.com/Blog/imo-2024-solutions/P1/index.html),
which made use of `useλy . x=>y.rec λS p=>?_`. The `use` tactic from
Mathlib wrapped the provided term in a type ascription, and so this was
equivalent to `use fun x => λy x x=>y.rec λS p=>?_`. (Note that cdot
function expansion is not able to take into account *where* the cdots
are located, and it is syntactically valid to insert an identifier into
the binder list like this. If we ever want to address this in the
future, we could have cdots expand into a special term that wraps an
identifier that evaluates to a local, but which would cause errors in
other contexts.)
Design note: we put the `hygieneInfo` on the open parenthesis rather
than at the end, since that way the hygiene information is available
even when there are parsing errors. This is important since we rely on
being able to elaborate partial syntax to get elab info (e.g. in `(a.`
to get completion info). Note that syntax matchers check that the
`hygieneInfo` is actually present, so such partial syntax would not be
matched.
This PR improves the `congr` tactic so that it can handle function
applications with fewer arguments than the arity of the head function.
This also fixes a bug where `congr` could not make progress with
`Set`-valued functions in Mathlib, since `Set` was being unfolded and
making such functions have an apparently higher arity.
This addresses issue #2128 for the `congr` tactic, but not `simp` and
others.
This PR tries to improve the E-matching pattern inference for `grind`.
That said, we still need better tools for annotating and maintaining
`grind` annotations in libraries.
closes#9125
This PR removes some unnecessary `Decidable*` instance arguments by
using lemmas in the `Classical` namespace instead of the `Decidable`
namespace.
This might lead to some additional dependency on classical axioms, but
large parts of the standard library are relying on them either way.
This PR adjusts the experimental module system to make `private` the
default visibility modifier in `module`s, introducing `public` as a new
modifier instead. `public section` can be used to revert the default for
an entire section, though this is more intended to ease gradual adoption
of the new semantics such as in `Init` (and soon `Std`) where they
should be replaced by a future decl-by-decl re-review of visibilities.
Although `HEq` was abbreviated as `≍` in #8503, many instances of the
form `HEq x y` still remain.
Therefore, I searched for occurrences of `HEq x y` using the regular
expression `(?<![A-Za-z/@]|``)HEq(?![A-Za-z.])` and replaced as many as
possible with the form `x ≍ y`.
This PR adds `grind` annotations relating `Nat.fold/foldRev/any/all` and
`Fin.foldl/foldr/foldlM/foldrM` to the corresponding operations on
`List.finRange`.
