Hi, these are just some spelling corrections.
There is one I wasn't completely sure about in
src/Init/Data/List/Lemmas.lean:
> See also
> ...
> Also
> \* \`Init.Data.List.Monadic\` for **addiation** _(additional?)_ lemmas
about \`List.mapM\` and \`List.forM\`
This PR refines and clarifies the `meta` phase distinction in the module
system.
* `meta import A` without `public` now has the clarified meaning of
"enable compile-time evaluation of declarations in or above `A` in the
current module, but not downstream". This is now checked statically by
enforcing that public meta defs, which therefore may be referenced from
outside, can only use public meta imports, and that global evaluating
attributes such as `@[term_parser]` can only be applied to public meta
defs.
* `meta def`s may no longer reference non-meta defs even when in the
same module. This clarifies the meta distinction as well as improves
locality of (new) error messages.
* parser references in `syntax` are now also properly tracked as meta
references.
* A `meta import` of an `import` now properly loads only the `.ir` of
the nested module for the purposes of execution instead of also making
its declarations available for general elaboration.
* `initialize` is now no longer being run on import under the module
system, which is now covered by `meta initialize`.
* Have asynchronous environment extensions specify whether they are
manipulate data for declarations from the "outside"/main branch (e.g.
attributes) or from the "inside"/async branch (e.g. data collected from
body elaboration) in order to avoid unnecessary waiting.
* Merge `findStateAsync?` into `getState` via a new, optional
`asyncDecl` parameter.
* Make `mayContainAsync` check an automatic part of `modifyState`.
This PR consolidates common attribute-related error messages into
reusable functions and updates the wording and formatting of relevant
error messages.
This PR removes uses of `Lean.RBMap` in Lean itself.
Furthermore some massaging of the import graph is done in order to avoid
having `Std.Data.TreeMap.AdditionalOperations` (which is quite
expensive) be the critical path for a large chunk of Lean. In particular
we can build `Lean.Meta.Simp` and `Lean.Meta.Grind` without it thanks to
these changes.
We did previously not conduct this change as `Std.TreeMap` was not
outperforming `Lean.RBMap` yet, however this has changed with the new
code generator.
This PR updates the formatting of, and adds explanations for, "unknown
identifier" errors as well as "failed to infer type" errors for binders
and definitions.
It attempts to ameliorate some of the confusion encountered in #1592 by
modifying the wording of the "header is elaborated before body is
processed" note and adding further discussion and examples of this
behavior in the corresponding error explanation.
This PR introduces an explicit `defeq` attribute to mark theorems that
can be used by `dsimp`. The benefit of an explicit attribute over the
prior logic of looking at the proof body is that we can reliably omit
theorem bodies across module boundaries. It also helps with intra-file
parallelism.
If a theorem is syntactically defined by `:= rfl`, then the attribute is
assumed and need not given explicitly. This is a purely syntactic check
and can be fooled, e.g. if in the current namespace, `rfl` is not
actually “the” `rfl` of `Eq`. In that case, some other syntax has be
used, such as `:= (rfl)`. This is also the way to go if a theorem can be
proved by `defeq`, but one does not actually want `dsimp` to use this
fact.
The `defeq` attribute will look at the *type* of the declaration, not
the body, to check if it really holds definitionally. Because of
different reduction settings, this can sometimes go wrong. Then one
should also write `:= (rfl)`, if one does not want this to be a defeq
theorem. (If one does then this is currently not possible, but it’s
probably a bad idea anyways).
The `set_option debug.tactic.simp.checkDefEqAttr true`, `dsimp` will
warn if could not apply a lemma due to a missing `defeq` attribute.
With `set_option backward.dsimp.useDefEqAttr.get false` one can revert
to the old behavior of inferring rfl-ness based on the theorem body.
Both options will go away eventually (too bad we can’t mark them as
deprecated right away, see #7969)
Meta programs that generate theorems (e.g. equational theorems) can use
`inferDefEqAttr` to set the attribute based on the theorem body of the
just created declaration.
This builds on #8501 to update Init to `@[expose]` a fair amount of
definitions that, if not exposed, would prevent some existing `:= rfl`
theorems from being `defeq` theorems. In the interest of starting
backwards compatible, I exposed these function. Hopefully many can be
un-exposed later again.
A mathlib adaption branch exists that includes both the meta programming
fixes and changes to the theorems (e.g. changing `:= by rfl` to `:=
rfl`).
With the module system there is now no special handling for `defeq`
theorem bodies, because we don’t look at the body anymore. The previous
hack is removed. The `defeq`-ness of the theorem needs to be checked in
the context of the theorem’s *type*; the error message contains a hint
if the defeq check fails because of the exported context.
The constructor `AttributeExtensionOLeanEntry.decl` and related code
seems to be unused, and has been unused since its introduction in
a77598f7cf three years ago. Probably worth
removing (and changing the now one-constructor inductive into a
structure).
The linters in Batteries can be used to spot mistakes in Lean. See the
message on
[Zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/270676-lean4/topic/Go-to-def.20on.20typeclass.20fields.20and.20type-dependent.20notation/near/442613564).
These are the different linters with errors:
- unusedArguments:
There are many unused instance arguments, especially a redundant `[Monad
m]` is very common
- checkUnivs:
There was a problem with universes in a definition in
`Init.Control.StateCps`. I fixed it by adding a `variable` statement for
the implicit arguments in the file.
- defLemma:
many proofs are written as `def` instead of `theorem`, most notably
`rfl`. Because `rfl` is used as a match pattern, it must be a def. Is
this desirable?
The keyword `abbrev` is sometimes used for an alias of a theorem, which
also results in a def. I would want to replace it with the `alias`
keyword to fix this, but it isn't available.
- dupNamespace:
I fixed some of these, but left `Tactic.Tactic` and `Parser.Parser` as
they are as these seem intended.
- unusedHaveSuffices:
I cleaned up a few proofs with unused `have` or `suffices`
- explicitVarsOfIff:
I didn't fix any of these, because that would be a breaking change.
- simpNF:
I didn't fix any of these, because I think that requires knowing the
intended simplification order.
Changing document string in `Attributes.lean`, in order to consistent
with code in `Lean.Parser.Attr`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Kim Morrison <kim@tqft.net>
Complement to #3967 , adds a `(since := "<date>")` field to
`@[deprecated]` so that metaprogramming code has access to the
deprecation date for e.g. bulk removals. Also adds `@[deprecated
"deprecation message"]` to optionally replace the default text
"`{declName}` has been deprecated, use `{newName}` instead".
This makes sure we can properly quote e.g. `deriving` clauses and avoids
a suspicious `eraseMacroScopes` call (though not at `Elab.Syntax`, since
categories do not have to be declaration names)
